Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BP Plans to Park Oil Box; Unload New Equipment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 12:28 PM
Original message
BP Plans to Park Oil Box; Unload New Equipment
Source: AP

ON THE GULF OF MEXICO — Crews planned Sunday to park the giant oil containment box on the bottom of the Gulf of Mexico, and offload equipment that could be used in a new attempt to stem the flow of gushing into the sea.

The equipment being offloaded from another vessel would use a tube to shoot mud and concrete directly into the well's blowout preventer, a process that could take two to three weeks. But BP PLC spokesman Mark Proegler told AP that no decisions have been made on what step the company will take next.

The company was considering three options, including the technique known as a "top kill," Proegler said.

Crews planned to secure the box about 1,600 feet from the massive leak site, much farther away from where it was placed Saturday after icelike crystals clogged the top when it was over the leak, according to a daily activity sheet reviewed by The Associated Press.

It could be at least a day before BP can make another attempt at putting a lid on a well spewing about 200,000 thousands of gallons of crude into the Gulf each day.

The company's first attempt to divert the oil was foiled, its mission now in serious doubt. Meanwhile, thick blobs of tar washed up on Alabama's white sand beaches, yet another sign the spill was spreading.

It had taken about two weeks to build the box and three days to cart the containment box 50 miles out and slowly lower it to the well a mile below the surface, but the frozen depths were just too much. BP officials were not giving up hopes that a containment box — either the one brought there or another one being built — could cover the well. But they said it could be Monday or later before they decide whether to make another attempt to capture the oil and funnel it to a tanker at the surface.

more: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gIXWYBTpLtSayJtg41LKXpxSxVPAD9FJEJH80
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Top kill is risky.
Edited on Sun May-09-10 01:06 PM by backscatter712
I'm no expert, but IIRC, the pipes have been getting seriously worn by the sand that's in the oil grinding them continuously.

Top kill could work if they can force enough mud and concrete & such to clog the well, but it could also cause overpressures, burst the pipes and make the leaks ten times worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. What is top kill exactly? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Essentially injecting stuff down the well to try to stop it from the top.
Edited on Sun May-09-10 01:21 PM by backscatter712
They'll pump drilling mud, heavy liquids, golf balls, pieces of rubber, cement, into the well at the blowout preventer (or what's left of it) to try to block the well from the top.

The risk is that it could put strain on the pipes, which have been getting continuously sandblasted from the inside by the rushing oil that's carrying lots of sand in it. It could stop the leak or slow it significantly, or it could cause a major blowout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Then I doubt they will risk it, sounds like the last thing to try if ever nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I would bet on that "ten times worse" thing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R...
thanks for the update.

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. I fear that no one really knows what to do.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I would have tried pumping warmer water down into the "dome" so the ice didn't form
but I guess that is just me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. They were talking about doing that...
as well as pumping methanol into the dome with the warm water, which would dissolve the methane hydrate.

Not easy to do at 5,000 feet underwater...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. bingo... ARROGANCE AND GREED are on parade with no solution in sight nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marions ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
11. It's hard for me to believe that they can't seal this thing forever
if they wanted to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC