Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Good explanation of why Bennett lost in Utah

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
IndianaJoe Donating Member (664 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 04:59 PM
Original message
Good explanation of why Bennett lost in Utah
Edited on Sun May-09-10 05:13 PM by IndianaJoe
It doesn't mean the Tea Party can do it elsewhere:

"The truth is, Bennett would not have lost anywhere other than Utah. For starters, it's the reddest state in the nation, so what's considered "conservative enough" there is a little further to the right than what's considered conservative enough in hotbeds of liberalism like, say, Texas or Alabama (i.e., everywhere else). Secondly, a major D.C. advocacy group, the Club for Growth, decided to spend a whopping $200,000 to ensure Bennett's defeat--the kind of intraparty hit that the Club can only afford to carry out in one or two races per cycle. And thirdly--and most importantly--Utah doesn't actually let its Republican residents vote on a full slate of Republican candidates. Instead, it convenes an odd, pre-primary convention where a select group of 3,500 delegates, who tend to be even more conservative than Utah's general Republican electorate, participate in several rounds of balloting in order to narrow the field to a measly two contenders. According to a recent Dan Jones & Associates poll, Bennett leads his closest rival, Lee, by 20 points among Utah Republicans at large--meaning in a normal primary system, he probably would've won the nomination. But because the senator received 160 fewer delegates at the convention than Bridgewater--delegates who were undoubtedly swayed by the Club's expensive anti-Bennett campaign--he isn't even getting the chance to compete. Needless to say, most other candidates nationwide don't have to worry about this sort of thing."

Newsweek

<http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/thegaggle/archive/2010/05/09/bennett-lost-in-utah-should-other-conservatives-be-scared.aspx>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Submariner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. decided to spend a whopping $200,000 to ensure Bennett's defeat
They may have much more cash next time around. I would like to know if the campaign donation decision overturned by the partisan activist neocons on the SCOTUS recently makes it easier for teabagger groups to get money for hit ads and other character assassination expenditures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Utah's convention system may be weird
but Bennett used it to his benefit as he was climbing the political ladder there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yeah, every story is different, but the common thread is Republicans are shooting themselves in the
You pick the appropriate body part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beyurslf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. 3500 voters with 200,000 to spend is just under 60 bucks per voter.
not bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC