Elena Kagan gets nominated. n/t

[LeftyFingerPop]

[MadMaddie]

1. Is it official?

[lonestarnot]

3. Yes it is.

[AndyA]

2. Not. Enough. Change.

Too conservative.

This will not bring about fair and equal treatment for all.

[lonestarnot]

4. Fuck!

Why do you say that?

[usregimechange]

5. She is not, imo, see here:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x4374617

[NYC Liberal]

9. LOL, yeah ok.

“Americans are more likely to speak of a golden past than of a golden future, of capitalism’s glories than of socialism’s greatness,” she wrote in her thesis. “Conformity overrides dissent; the desire to conserve has overwhelmed the urge to alter. Such a state of affairs cries out for explanation.”

She called the story of the socialist movement’s demise “a sad but also a chastening one for those who, more than half a century after socialism’s decline, still wish to change America ... In unity lies their only hope.”

Outside her academics, Kagan served as editorial chairman for the ‘Prince,’ where she was responsible for the opinion content of the paper and the unsigned editorials that appeared almost daily — many of which took decidedly liberal stances on national and campus issues.

One set of unsigned editorials published in the spring of 1980, written in response to the federal government’s discussion of reinstating draft registration, attacked the militaristic identity the country was headed toward. The nation was “unfortunately” moving toward “an era in which myopic and over-sensitive ‘national pride’ precludes the thoughtful search for alternatives to an unnecessary draft registration,” it said.

Criticizing the University’s lack of attention to women’s issues, some pieces spoke out against male-only membership in certain eating clubs and the lack of female tenured faculty, and called for a women’s studies program “irrespective of student demand.”

Etc.

http://www.dailyprincetonian.com/2010/05/03/26081/

[lonestarnot]

10. She was paid 10k by goldman sachs for something she did for them. What was that about?

[HughMoran]

12. She did enough hours worth of work for them to earn $10k

What's that - 2 weeks work for a high-priced law firm?

:shrug:

[lonestarnot]

13. But what are the details? What work?

[HughMoran]

14. It was posted within the last couple of days

I didn't commit it to memory as it seemed innocuous enough - search through some of the posts updated in the last couple of days.

[saltpoint]

6. Is there a link? Nevermind. There is:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/36967616/ns/politics-supreme_court/

[usregimechange]

7. MSNBC has it, Yes!

:bounce:

[AngryAmish]

8. I need to study this issue

I'm sure everyone cares.

[lonestarnot]

11. Not everyone cares about everything, anything or nothing. Why study the issue for that reason.

:shrug: