Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Media Matters - RW Media Distorts Kagan's Opposition To DADT As Opposition To Military As A Whole

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 12:13 AM
Original message
Media Matters - RW Media Distorts Kagan's Opposition To DADT As Opposition To Military As A Whole
Edited on Mon May-10-10 12:17 AM by TomCADem
The right wing media is out with the fear and smear again. First, by mischaracterizing her support for repealing DADT as opposition to the military. Second, by starting a whisper campaign that her support for gay rights must mean that she is gay.

http://mediamatters.org/research/201004270036


Peter Beinart claimed that Republicans are "right" to "beat the hell out of" Solicitor General Elena Kagan for "barring the military from campus."

* * *
Kagan's decision to briefly reinstate restrictions on military recruiters followed Third Circuit decision stating that the law requiring full access was unconstitutional. In 2004, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit held 2-1 in FAIR v. Rumsfeld that the Solomon Amendment -- which stated that universities that do not provide access to military recruiters cannot receive certain federal money -- violated First Amendment free-speech rights. Judge Walter Stapleton, a Reagan appointee, joined the majority opinion in the case. Stapleton had previously been appointed to a federal district court judgeship by President Nixon. Kagan subsequently reinstated the ban against military recruitment through OCS for one semester in 2005 after the 3rd Circuit held that the law was unconstitutional. Kagan explained that she took the action because the military's Don't Ask, Don't Tell policy violated Harvard's non-discrimination policy.

While restrictions were in place, military recruiters had access to Harvard Law students through school's veterans association. As Kagan explained in a September 2005 letter to her colleagues:

The Law School's anti-discrimination policy, adopted in 1979, provides that any employer that uses the services of OCS to recruit at the school must sign a statement indicating that that it does not discriminate on various bases, including sexual orientation. As a result of this policy, the military was barred for many years from using the services of OCS. The military retained full access to our students (and vice versa) through the good offices of the Harvard Law School Veterans Association, which essentially took the place of OCS in enabling interviews to occur.

...

I reinstated the application of our anti-discrimination policy to the military (after appropriate consultation with University officials) in the wake of the Third Circuit's decision; as a result, the military did not receive OCS assistance during our spring 2005 recruiting season.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. So what if she is gay ==
just look at all the closet gays in the republican party that have been found out lately. Throw that back at them. That it is OK for a person to be whatever they want, even a republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. She's Gonna Get Hit On All Sides...
We've already seen some on this side of the sandbox who aren't too crazy about Ms. Kagan and I expect her getting hit with similar writings or decisions from the opposite side. Her speeches and positions will be cherry picked as to serve the purpose of those who want to oppose her nomination...and partly a reason I still get a feeling she isn't the pick. She's too well known, too easy to oppo research (as we're already seeing) and this creates a nice smoke screen to bring out another nominee and send everyone inside the beltway scrambling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC