While reading a NYT article about the Kagan pick today, I noticed this passage:
"But Mr. Obama ultimately
opted to save Judge Garland for when he faces a more hostile Senate and needs a nominee with more Republican support. Democrats expect to lose seats in this fall’s election, so if another Supreme Court seat comes open next year and Mr. Obama has a substantially thinner margin in the Senate than he has today,
Judge Garland would be an obvious choice."http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/10/us/politics/10court.html?hpSo not only are we very likely moving right with Kagan vs. Stevens, but an even more Republican friendly judge may be next. The ultra-right-wing website Human Events has said the following about Garland:
For now, the odds favor the 57-year-old Garland, Harvard Law graduate and former Clinton Administration official. Considered a liberal, although not as far left as Stevens, Garland nonetheless has offended few Republicans. Sen. Orrin Hatch (R.-Utah), a past Judiciary Committee chairman, speaks highly of Garland and is considered likely to back him if he’s nominated. Prominent in both national legal circles and on the Washington social scene, Garland first gained notice for doing much of the legal work after the Oklahoma City bombings in 1995.
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=36499Note: Any centrist is considered "liberal" by ultra right-wingers, so disregard the label given to her by Human Events. If Orrin Hatch likes you and you anger "few Republicans," you are no liberal.
Wikipedia describes her as a "moderate."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merrick_B._Garland