Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

RNC Chair Steele Attacks Kagan Over Thurgood Marshall Comment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 11:07 AM
Original message
RNC Chair Steele Attacks Kagan Over Thurgood Marshall Comment
Edited on Mon May-10-10 11:11 AM by usregimechange
According to Kagan Marshall’s vision, is “a thing of glory.”


Republican National Chairman Michael Steele is calling Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan to account for her comments in support of Thurgood Marshall, the first black justice on the nation's highest court.

Steele's statement is attracting plenty of attention from liberal bloggers, who never miss a chance to whack the Republican Party's first black chairman. But Steele's words are also provoking private concern from Republican strategists, who question the wisdom of attacking Kagan for words she wrote praising Marshall after his death in 1993.

Steele's statement, issued minutes after Obama announced his intention to nominate Kagan, said that Senate Republicans need to raise "serious and tough questions" about her legal philosophy. Included in that, Steele said, is "her support for statements suggesting that the Constitution 'as originally drafted and conceived, was "defective."'"

Kagan, a Supreme Court law clerk for Marshall, was extremely familiar with the Baltimore-born jurist's views on the Constitution, which he regarded as a "living document." His liberalism clashed with the ideology of conservative "originalists," such as Justice Antonin Scalia, who say that in rendering decisions on the law of the land they consider the Constitution's meaning and language at the time it was written.

Marshall, addressing the issue at length in a 1987 speech commemorating the bicentennial of the Constitution, used the word "defective" to refer to the government devised by America's 18th century founders. In particular, Marshall discussed the Constitution's deliberate omission of equal rights for women and black slaves. That is the sentiment Steele singled out for criticism in his statement about Kagan.

http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/news/local/politics/2010/05/steele_attacks_kagan_over_thur.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. The obvious
If it wasn't defective, it wouldn't have needed to be amended 27 times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Journeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. More obvious, its primary defects lead to the Civil War. . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. Steele's attacks are no more crazy or out of touch than Greenwald's or Fire Dog Lake's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
disillusioned73 Donating Member (963 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. I see you can copy & paste
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. Thurgood Marshall's full speech:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
4. Steeley Mike: "Kagan fails to adequately support Republicon luggage handlers."
Edited on Mon May-10-10 11:16 AM by SpiralHawk
"...and she has never uttered a word in support of faux lesbian bondage clubs, or wide-stance diaper sex with hookers. Therefore, no self-disrespecting republicon TeaBagger could possibly, um, back her. And stuff like that."

- Steeley Mike (R - Chickenhawk, of course)
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_FGwroanbS8w/SczFtRpejGI/AAAAAAAABDM/jcJedm270oA/s400/Steele,+Michael+LtGov.jpg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
5. Does he think the constitution was divinely inspired and therefore perfect
by definition? That argument doesn't even work for the Bible, much less any constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
6. I need someone with access to Lexis to pull up comments...
Kagan, Texas Law Review of May 1993
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Title: “For Justice Marshall”
Edited on Mon May-10-10 11:22 AM by usregimechange
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
8. You know, what ever you think about Kagan, this was a dumb comment and political move
plain dumb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Yep telling the truth is very dumb indeed.
The US constitution was indeed quite flawed and heaven forbid some in Power brought attention to that fact..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. This is a reason to support Kagan and Marshall
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Journeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
11. But that was the intent of Mr Lincoln's remarks at Gettysburg, to remake the nation. . .
and place it on the footing of the Declaration's call for equality, instead of the Constitution's muddled legalistic gyrations of partial people and commerce in property over personal freedom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
13. Shut up and wait for your failure of a term to expire. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC