Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Farmers Cope With Roundup-Resistant Weeds

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
rrneck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 11:17 AM
Original message
U.S. Farmers Cope With Roundup-Resistant Weeds
Just as the heavy use of antibiotics contributed to the rise of drug-resistant supergerms, American farmers’ near-ubiquitous use of the weedkiller Roundup has led to the rapid growth of tenacious new superweeds.

....

The first resistant species to pose a serious threat to agriculture was spotted in a Delaware soybean field in 2000. Since then, the problem has spread, with 10 resistant species in at least 22 states infesting millions of acres, predominantly soybeans, cotton and corn.

....

Sales took off in the late 1990s, after Monsanto created its brand of Roundup Ready crops that were genetically modified to tolerate the chemical, allowing farmers to spray their fields to kill the weeds while leaving the crop unharmed. Today, Roundup Ready crops account for about 90 percent of the soybeans and 70 percent of the corn and cotton grown in the United States.

....

“The biotech industry is taking us into a more pesticide-dependent agriculture when they’ve always promised, and we need to be going in, the opposite direction,” said Bill Freese, a science policy analyst for the Center for Food Safety in Washington.



http://axisoflogic.com/artman/publish/Article_59777.shtml

----------------------------------------

Twenty years ago we used a "rope wick" gadget for Roundup. It would just put a smear of the chemical about the size of your pinky finger on Johnson grass and kill the whole thing right down to the rhizome. Now they have soybeans designed to work with the chemical. Just keep piling eggs in that one basket guys, we'll get somebody else to pay for the disaster later...



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
era veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. Monsanto, the Evil Empire
There will be consequences to using this poison. Bee Colony Collapse may be one. Go organic, feed your head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbiker Donating Member (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. was roundup actually considered
and end all for all species of weeds. i am unsure whether it was ever promoted that way, i could be wrong thou, it just makes sense that no one weedkiller would kill every variety of weed known to man
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rrneck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. As I recall,
it'll kill damn near anything. But I don't know if that matters. Monsanto would have you putting it on your cornflakes if they could.

It seems to me to be more about resource concentration as a result of an ongoing program of economic concentration. They are trying to corner the market on herbicide in any way they can, and that effort stifles innovation in a variety of ways not limited to weeds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
era veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Roundup kills almost everything/ Monsanto has genetically modified seed
that is resistant, hence Evil Empire. Their seeds will be the kind that are available. We could have human society collapse if anything goes wrong like bee colony collapse. This has not been proven but it more than just speculation. Regardless, their are too many chemicals that haven't been tested well and what kind of problems this seed will cause. I am afraid they will fuck up agriculture for money. We should hope Silent Spring doesn't turn into silent forever. Peace, Richard
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. Back to pulling them up by the roots. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. I've read
that it lowers sperm counts. But since we have too many people, maybe that's not so bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC