rsmith6621
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-10-10 05:27 PM
Original message |
| Axelrod...Kagan Has A Variety Of Gov. Service.... |
|
Edited on Mon May-10-10 05:28 PM by rsmith6621
....In response to her lack of service on the bench...
....Hell.....If thats all it takes to get on the High Bench then the next vacancy I am going to Washington DC and campaign for a local politician in my state who has equal amount of government service and has taught in a law school as well.....
....She was fronted because she is the path to least resistance in conformation....
|
| babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-10-10 05:34 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Sounds like you don't know a thing about her. If you want to learn, |
| katandmoon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-10-10 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| saracat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-10-10 05:39 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. I am not against Kagan but why does what Axelrod say matter? He spouts talking points. |
|
He certainly isn't unbiased. I don't really necessarily believe that prior judicial experience should be a deal breaker but it isn't a negative and community service or other areas of contribution are NOT a substitute for it. If a candidate doesn't have it , they don't have it.They may have other wqualities that are superior.tout those instead of apologizing for what they don't have otr attempting to diminish judicial experiemce as a value.
|
| NJmaverick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-10-10 05:56 PM
Response to Original message |
| 4. 40 out of 110 Supreme Court Justices were not lawyers |
|
that should pretty much end this line of debate
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:48 AM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
