Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Two-Thirds of Senate Ready to Ban Land Mines;

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-10 12:44 PM
Original message
Two-Thirds of Senate Ready to Ban Land Mines;
Two-Thirds of Senate Ready to Ban Land Mines; But Not Obama

The United States has the political votes to join an international treaty banning land mines—an agreement first pushed by Washington more than 15 years ago—leaving it up to President Barack Obama to join in the effort. Sixty eight senators, representing more than two-thirds of the Senate, signed a letter to Obama urging him to submit the treaty for ratification. The number of senators is more than what’s necessary to approve the agreement.

Although the Mine Ban Treaty was developed in part by the Clinton administration, the U.S. was not in a position to become a party to it before President Bill Clinton left office. Ratification was left up to President George W. Bush, who decided against joining the agreement.

The current push in Congress has been led by a bipartisan group consisting of Senators Patrick Leahy (D–Vermont) and George Voinovich (R–Ohio), and Representatives Jim McGovern (D–Massachusetts) and Darrell Issa (R–California).

A total of 158 nations have joined the 1997 Mine Ban Treaty, while 37 have not.

Joining the treaty would in some ways be a formality for the U.S., since it has not used antipersonnel mines since 1991, exported them since 1992, or produced them since 1997.

Nonetheless, there is no indication that President Obama will submit the treaty for ratification. On November 24, 2009, State Department spokesman Jim Kelly stated that, “we made our policy review and we determined that we would not be able to meet our national defense needs, nor our security commitments to our friends and allies if we sign this convention.”

http://www.allgov.com/Top_Stories/ViewNews/Two_Thirds_of_Senate_Ready_to_Ban_Land_Mines_But_Not_Obama_100511
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jaksavage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-10 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes Yes nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-10 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wouldn't that be the greatest!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Morbius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-10 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. I find it rather astonishing America didn't get behind this decades ago.
Get it done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC