Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

High Remediation Rates Mean Paying Twice for Learning

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 09:17 PM
Original message
High Remediation Rates Mean Paying Twice for Learning
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iOHlQuMUF6U9anesMfMGcqEbL1LgD9FKO7LG0

The AP has a disconcerting story that illustrates just how poorly prepared public school students are for college. According to Department of Education numbers, more than 30 percent of students entering American colleges require remedial training in at least one subject—in community colleges, it's more like 40 percent. Students forced into remedial classes are much more likely to drop out of college.

The cost of remedial education ends up being passed onto the taxpayer, who ends up paying twice to teach a student a particular subject. (That fact is less important than the human impact of failing to prepare students for college-level work, but monetary arguments are often better for prompting change.)

According to the AP story:

The price of providing remedial training is costly. The Alliance for Excellent Education estimates the nation loses $3.7 billion a year because students are not learning basic needed skills, including $1.4 billion to provide remedial education for students who have recently completed high school.

snip...

The basic goal here, especially on the college side of college- and career-ready, is to have higher education agree that the new "proficient" means ready to begin credit-bearing work in college without the need for remediation. The ultimate test of that is: Will higher education use these assessments as their assessment of college readiness and not retest students with another test to throw them into remedial courses? As Haycock emphasized, ending remediation will require colleges and K-12 educators to be on the same page with regard to what level of reading, writing, and mathematics is necessary for success in higher education.

The bonus is that doing so will save us all some money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Gidney N Cloyd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe I'm not reading the article right. Are they recommending colleges dumb down their standards?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
exboyfil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Ditto
You need a certain minimum proficiency to function in college. Nothing is going to change this fact. If you are in the Math, Science, or Engineering you should have at least Pre-Calculus before starting college. Our High Schools require 4 years of English, 3 years of Math and Science even to graduate. The expectation for most Math, Science, or Engineering majors is actually 5 years of Math and 5 years of Science (accomplished by starting High School classes in 8th grade). I know the competition is brutal at our High School. Remember that kids in other countries even have higher expectations.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC