Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate Considers Bill to Stop Remote Laptop Surveillance

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 03:29 PM
Original message
Senate Considers Bill to Stop Remote Laptop Surveillance
http://www.heartland.org/article/27595/Senate_Considers_Bill_to_Stop_Remote_Laptop_Surveillance.html

Senate Considers Bill to Stop Remote Laptop Surveillance

Written By: Phil Britt
Published In: InfoTech & Telecom News
Publication date: 05/07/2010
Publisher: The Heartland Institute

---------------------------------------------------------------------

......

The Surreptitious Video Surveillance Act (S. 3214), introduced in April by Sens. Arlen Specter (D-PA), Russ Feingold (D-WI), and Ted Kaufman (D-DE), would institute the nation’s first explicit rules outlawing video surveillance. ......The FBI is now pursuing a criminal investigation against the Lower Merion School District on possible wiretapping violations.

......

Under Specter’s bill, persons caught capturing and storing video without the taped user’s consent would face the same civil and criminal penalties as those who wiretap an unsuspecting caller’s phone.........The bill, if approved, would update the current Wiretap Act, which was drafted in the 1960s, long before today’s modern video-ready Internet.

......


Harold J. Krent, dean of the Chicago-Kent College of Law, says Specter’s bill does not go far enough......“This is an important step forward, but it doesn’t include any prohibition against capturing wireless video,” Krent said, noting unauthorized third parties are increasingly intercepting wireless video transmissions.


.....Although the Lower Merion case has received much attention, Johnson suggests other school districts, government agencies, and even private companies might be engaging in secret photographing.

......

Anthony Gregory, a research analyst with the Independent Institute in Oakland, California, says the “most ominous implication for civil liberties in this story is that it signals a generally high cultural threshold for government invasions into personal life.”......“That even the beloved public school system would engage in something so Orwellian should immediately spark a profound national debate on the nature of government, its role in our lives, and whatever limits should be placed on surveillance,” he said.......“It is time for deep contemplation of our public institutions and their power over people’s lives,” he said.

......

Scott Testa, a professor of business administration at Cabrini College in Philadelphia, said the “initial reaction from the school district was deny, deny, deny.” And that only made the situation worse, he says.......“The school district handled this as badly as they could have handled it,” Testa said. “They denied it, then hid behind their lawyers. When you have people do things like this, then you need laws to protect people.”

.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. I wonder how they'll reconcile this against the millions of commercial video surveillance cameras...
Edited on Thu May-13-10 05:22 PM by Tesha
...and law-enforcement video surveillance cameras.

"You are now entering the United States. By doing so, you consent
to being recorded on video at any time and any place by any law-
enforcement organization. If you do not consent to this, turn around
and go back wherever you came from."

"You are now walking past Walmart. By doing so, you consent to
us recording your image forever on our video surveillance systems."

"Good evening ma'am; may I see your license and registration
please? And let me mention that by allowing me to stop you,
you have automatically consented to my recording our encounter
using my dashboard video camera."

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Well, public spaces versus private spaces is one distinction
that comes to mind...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. kick nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 17th 2024, 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC