Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I've said this since this began: Gulf Geyser10x's worse; Exxon Valdez EVERY 4 DAYS!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 09:09 PM
Original message
I've said this since this began: Gulf Geyser10x's worse; Exxon Valdez EVERY 4 DAYS!
http://www.stumbleupon.com/su/9u7kN2/rawstory.com/rs/2010/0513/gulf-oil-gusher-ten-times-worse-prior-estimates//r:t

So this is why BP's release of video showing the Gulf oil gusher was mysteriously delayed.

According to a scientific analysis of footage from the bottom of the Gulf of Mexico, National Public Radio is claiming the growing ecological disaster is actually ten times worse than previously estimated, saying the rushing torrent of oil pouring into the ocean is equivalent to one Exxon-Valdez spill every four days.

That's more than 70,000 barrels a day -- when the U.S. Coast Guard had placed the figure at a seemingly modest 5,000 barrels a day.

Until this point in human history, the Exxon-Valdez disaster was the worst oil spill ever, with nearly 11 million gallons of crude lost to the murky depths.

The Deepwater Horizon well has been jetting oil unabated for just short of one month at time of this writing. Already, the pollution exceeds a scale which most individual humans can fully grasp.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. I so wish you'd been wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalLoner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Me too. This is so fucking awful. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I so wish I was too ....and that they'd been able to *fix* this by now...
....unfortunately for all of us and the environment...my prediction was too close. :evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. I was under the understanding that it was more like 210,000 barrels per day.
And I wouldn't call that a spill, but more like a gusher and a disaster for certain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. 5,000 barrels = 210,000 gallons
I keep making the same mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Ok, got it... Thanks for the info.. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Two articles I posted previously......
May 2nd from the AP...
http://blog.al.com/live/2010/05/bp_chairman_says_dome_to_be_de.html

In an exploration plan and environmental impact analysis filed with the federal government in February 2009, BP said it had the capability to handle a "worst-case scenario" at the site, which the document described as a leak of 162,000 barrels per day from an uncontrolled blowout -- 6.8 million gallons each day.

May 4th from the NYTimes...
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/05/us/05spill.html?ref=us


Who really knows just how bad it is...the only people who can say for sure are to blame...haven't and never will get a straight answer from them. x(



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. This really is sad. I really have a hard time with the survival of anything on this planet with
something as devastating as this disaster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Yep... the repercussions are unfathomable. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bryn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. Where the hell is the cavalry?
It's gushing, gushing, gushing yet Oil people and Politicians are playing games. This is serious and an emergency! It is affecting all of us. BP is trying to get that oil rather than destroy it so they're busy looking for ways to stop the gushing yet still get oil. Doh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Go figure huh, money talks and it doesn't seem like anyone is going to hold them accountable.
Damn, that has a familiar ring to it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
8. My god, my god...
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Have mercy....
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Newest Reality Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
14. There is even a potential for an extinction event
if this oil volcano continues to spew unabated for a long period of time. That oil can make its way into the Gulf Stream Currents and move around Florida and up around the East Coast ... and beyond. At what point can we call this an unprecedented ecological disaster? Time will tell.

I don't know if we have any idea or estimates of how much it will dilute/disperse and what toxicity levels will develop down the line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. That has also been my fear all along..
....it is most definitely an unprecedented ecological disaster already...time will tell indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Too bad we are not taught to think of those who will follow beyond immediate family nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
15. the real fix would hurt BP profits
I've read that the measures needed to stop the gusher would cost BP too much in profits,
and would destroy the oil well.

So really they are trying to save the oil well, not the Gulf.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #15
24. Exactly!
The bastards are trying to save the damn oil well!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
16. As I said before this story has the potential to be the biggest story of our lives
If this continues the entire Gulf and it's eco-system will die. I can't even begin to imagine the impact that will have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
17. As the oceans begin to die
the oil companies sit and point fingers at each other and have no idea how to stop it short of using a nuke on it and then they still have the cleanup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
18. k
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
20. Whatever happens we have to keep this in the news here and everywhere nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
piedmont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
22. Exxon Valdez was not the worst spill in history. It's not even in the top 30.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost4words Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. oh well that changes everything,...........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC