Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Corporations and capitalism will be responsible for the end of life as we know it.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 10:47 AM
Original message
Corporations and capitalism will be responsible for the end of life as we know it.
All the polluting, the over fishing, overpopulating of the human race destroying habitat will be the undoing of mankind. Eventually there will be more people than food and not enough drinkable water. Throw in climate change and human extinction is likely to occur.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. I have this image of those guys in suits from American Psycho running the country
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Recall the notorious Enron phone calls of yuppie fascists joking about taking granny's $
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #4
17. nope, brain cells dying....but am interested. Could you please refresh my memory?
I would very much appreciate a briefing from you, or if you have it, a link.

Thanks so much!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #17
73. here you go
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #73
75. Thank you *very* much. Those quotes about stealing from "granny" will be
shared widely with some elderly folks.

I appreciate it! :yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
89. I remember that.
No one I've met (offline) seems to give a shit.

:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Alas, it's not just an "image!"
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. someone on DU who worked on WallStreet said it's true
that there really are these sociopathic yuppies running the country, just like those found in that movie..that the movie represented them very well.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. Well, humans had a good run
But its past time.

Tough to feel sorry for all the other species they took out. I mean really...they didn't put up much of a fight now, did they? How many millions of years does it take to develop complex language or civilization? Sorry lizards and frogs...you will not inherit our cess pit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. More animals will go into extinction in the next 20 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
93. Love the sig line!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geardaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. I think you can cast your net wider than that.
i.e. humans regardless of ideology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Actually I did with overpopulating, but I could said littering, like throwing garbage in the ocean.
Human waste in the ocean. Developing new unnatural bacteria.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
8. Monsanto trying to privatize the world's food supply won't help either.
That company is pure evil. They should be shut down before they do more damage with their GMO crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geardaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. +1000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. I agree, but greed rains supreme globally.
Monsanto wants to protect food supply for the elite, leaving the rest of us to fight for scraps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chillspike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
12. Capitalism must be phased out
A green self sustaining living model must take the place of competitive capitalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #12
19. Sadly, we don't have the time for a "phase".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #12
36. Imagine a vampire movie where the good guys decide to phase out the bloodsuckers
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
randr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
13. Life as we once knew it is already history
Must read---"Eaarth" by Bill McKibben author of The End of Nature
You are right, the corporations with their control of our media and political system, have destroyed our planet.
We are now the lobster in the boiling pot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #13
61. Frog. Lobsters know to scream and try to escape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
14. human extinction is, of course, pretty much a sure thing.
species come and go. humans are surely not immune from that. but as you say, it's the overpopulation problem that's the crux of the problem. Your title credits corporations and capitalism with our coming demise, but nothing in the body of your post supports that. Certainly capitalism and corporate greed are part of the equation, but I believe that the billions of people on the planet play a greater role than anything else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. I did mention overpopulation destroying natural habitat; which destroys necessary food chains. The
food chains; which make life sustainable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #18
43. Yes, but what is the connection between overpopulation and corporations or capitalism?

Developed countries in general have lower birthrates, so it's difficult to grasp the connection you are attempting to make here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #43
48. I should worded the headline better, because I didn't mean to confuse you.
I blame people for overpopulation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #48
51. I Agree - People Are Indeed The Likely Culprits Behind Overpopulation
Edited on Fri May-14-10 12:23 PM by jberryhill
Perhaps if a lot of people die, then this will take care of overpopulation, but you also seem to be averse to that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #51
54. We need a moratorium on births globally, but it won't happen,
because of religion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #51
55. I could not stomach so many deaths.
I cannot stomach death period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #55
57. Well, That's Quite A Bind

Too many people, and not enough deaths.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #57
74. So who should we condemn to death?
The non-productive poor, the elderly, the disabled? Hitler thought that was a good idea, along with a few other groups he thought served no useful purpose. Was he just ahead of his time?

Or, we could raise the standards of living across the globe, which tends to reduce over population.

But as long as all the wealth of the world remains in the hands of a few, and the masses are merely slaves contributing to that ill-gotten wealth, things will only get worse.

So there is a direct connection between greedy, unregulated capitalism and the conditions that we are now facing worldwide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #74
76. That's the list: "The non-productive poor, the elderly, the disabled? "
I just wish they would give us the pills so we could go in peace, instead of suffering.

Or maybe that is their entertainment.

You do know that it appears that the current administration if following in Raygun's footsteps, and trying to get rid of those on disability, right?

One person told me to expect to see a lot of suicides.

Just give us the pills for a peaceful exit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #76
78. Free Suicide Pills?

What kind of commie are you?

You are going to have to WORK for those suicide pills, son.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #78
79. "What kind of commie are you?"
A female one. :hi:

You know, I think it is really cheesy to decide you want to get rid of a segment of the population, and then do it in a way that you don't have to take any responsibility for it.

Squeeze them out until they have to kill themselves, then sadly :shrug: and say, "What can you do with people this sick?"

At least take the responsibility for your own decisions.... for your own actions.



Wadda country.... :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #79
81. I have no idea what you are on about, actually

...as I don't know where you get the impression that I want to get rid of some portion of the population.

In response to someone upthread, who had issues with overpopulation, but also has problems with death, I noted that these two things put him in some sort of a bind.

But, it's all about responsibility, yes. No free suicide pills to people who are always looking for another handout.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #81
82. sorry... the "you" is the collective "You".... to be more precise, the government.
I didn't realize until rereading that what I had in my head wasn't the same is what I wrote.

I am talking about the government decision to dump a lot of people on disability.

Kinda like Clinton dumping a lot of poor mothers and children, and not giving a damn what happened to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #82
83. I am not a "collective you"

I am an autonomous federation of me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #83
85. Sorry, then. I will keep it to myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #51
96. Capitalism begets poverty.

Poverty begets high replacement rates.

Kill Capitalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
15.  "Crony Capitalism Is NOT Capitalism", see DU post below.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #15
21. Capitalism is a wealth distribution mechanism that works efficiently...
Edited on Fri May-14-10 11:24 AM by Oregone
to distribute wealth created in production disproportionally to the already rich.

When the wealthy can amass that much power and resources, and influence the government, the natural evolution of capitalism is what you mention.

While people want to sit around and defend capitalism, they fail to realize that what we have today directly depends upon, and is a result of, capitalism in general. Capitalism creates the prerequisite conditions for the status quo to come about.

This is why laissez faire capitalism is purely a myth (and dangerous in its own right). The moment the elite press the limits of disparity and amass significant power, they will ensure the government will create policy in their favor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daggahead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. Don't forget the most important element of capitalism ...
Edited on Fri May-14-10 11:24 AM by daggahead
exploitation of resources - whether those resources be natural, human or financial.

There is a dictum among those seeking to be rich (a-holes like fiction writer Robert Kyosaki push this idea) by applying to the idea of OPM - other people's money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. Capitalism started with slavery. Every global super power had it at some point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. It is the notion that one man can purchase the right to profit from another man's labor
Edited on Fri May-14-10 11:40 AM by Oregone
Slavery set the idealogical framework for this concept while it was exercised in its most extreme form; but make no mistake, this notion still exists today (and is practiced).

People sit at home and profit from the labor of others, via "rights" (shares) they inherit from their grandfathers; many are the great grandchildren of plantation men and sweat factory owners. And we hold these people up with great admiration in our society, because, afterall, they allow their laborers to have big screen LCD TVs with 104 channels of shit to choose from (when they have jobs).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. Low wage workers are slaves. Capitalism has put borders around the working class. The middle class
is heading for extinction. Most Americans are living paycheck to paycheck and Capitalism loves because there are more workers than employment opportunity. Slaves!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. Thanks for sharing your opinion with me. I don't know of any economic system that operates
effectively and efficiently with a central planning function for goods and services.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. And never did I suggest that such a system is needed
Though, there are many mixed economies that use central planning to deliver necessary goods and services efficiently (like health care, energy and insurance for example). They leave private industry in charge of knick-knacks.

But perhaps what is needed is a system that is both decentralized for unnecessary goods and does not disproportinoally distribute wealth to the upper classes (employee owned enterprise would fit such requirements). If you can create a system with fair wealth distribution that has a null effect (or a combative one) on disparity, you would not be seeing the elite in the position to form a marriage with government, and run amok.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. Basically you are saying a democratic-socialist government would suffice. I agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #29
32. Do you expect that a "democratic-socialist government" would protect individual rights? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #32
34. The right to make laborers so poor they die from lack of access to medical treatment?
Edited on Fri May-14-10 12:06 PM by Oregone
I don't think they would support that right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. Democratic-Socialism would provide medicine and affordable college. The U.S. has privatized public
universities. I should say capitalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #34
40. In #32 I meant "individual rights" enumerated and unenumerated protected by our Constitution.
Socialist and Fascist governments are totalitarian with government agencies planning for all aspects of production.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. Most true. Socialism isn't concerned about the individual and individual rights
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #26
31. You said "Corporations and capitalism" and "All the polluting" etc.
In context that means the effect "All the polluting" is caused by "Corporations and capitalism".

I disagreed because IMO "capitalism" is not the cause but "crony capitalism" is the cause.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. No I didn't
I just replied to your post, pointing out that "capitalism" is the cause of "crony capitalism", as you call it. :)

You can't have one without the other...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #33
37. mea culpa, I confused your post with ej510 posts. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #15
70. Stop being an apologists

It's all Capitalism, and it's got to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #70
84. The issue is whether one wants a central government that controls production & decides which rights
government should allow individuals to exercise OR one supports natural, inalienable/unalienable rights i.e. life, liberty, ownership of property and minimal government authority.

Fascism and socialism, just forms of totalitarianism, preach the former and democratic governments the latter.

Our present government does not support capitalism as evidenced by limited liability for corporations and forcing individuals to pay for corporate losses and letting corporations reap obscene profits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #84
86. That makes no sense.

How does government collusion with and coddling of corporations make it not support capitalism?

That is capitalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #86
88. Government controlled by corporatist ostensibly favors capitalism but that's really crony-capitalism
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #88
90. No, that's capitalism..

Capitalism inevitably evolves, the scale of accumulation requires it to make use of the state to create investment opportunities, if capital is to expand, and it must. Monopolies are also an inevitable. The kind of capitalism which libertarians like to describe was a snapshot in time at best, it is like asking the chicken to go back into the egg.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #90
91. OK, we've exchanged opinions. Have a nice day and goodbye n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftinOH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
16. Movie triple-bill which describes it best: Idiocracy + Soylent Green + Brazil ..n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daggahead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
20. The Boiler Room ...
That is what capitalism is to me ... a bunch of people that know how to rip people off, ripping people off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. Boiler Room damn near described what Goldman Sachs was doing,
and what Wall St did as a whole, and that was selling garbage stocks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kctim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
27. LOL
We will adapt, just as we always have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #27
35. flawed logic. simply because we've adapted in the past
is not assurance that we will always adapt in the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #35
39. I don't think we have enough time to adapt or the intellectual heft to.
Religion is another hinderance. People need to use contraception.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #39
45. You forgot to add "Non corporate contraception"

Since, apparently, corporations aren't producing it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kctim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #39
66. Such dire things are always spoken of
We didn't have the time to fix the polluting of the 70s either. Fish kills, acid rain, overflowing landfills, smog, crying indians? The planet couldn't handle another billion people? Global cooling? Forests gone in a few years?
All were fearful "predictions" signaling the end of the world.

Of course things are going to change and there will hard times. I totally agree with you and life as we know it will change. But complete human extintion? Maybe, from a celestial body.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kctim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #35
64. Of course there is no guarantee
but a proven history of adapting is alot more valid than using personal opinion to "prove" an end of the human race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
42. Corporations are "overpopulating"?

I didn't even know they could do that.

Human extinction, btw, is not "likely" to occur. It is certain to occur eventually. It always has been certain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. Much, much more likely since the mid-20th century
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. Yes, all certainties become more likely to occur as time proceeds /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #46
50. Especially with the advent of tens of thousands of extinction-ensuring weapons...
... set to mass, instantaneous delivery systems

Not to mention a host of biological/chemical goodies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #50
52. Yes, well our original poster seems concerned with overpopulation

So, you are apparently here to inject the "good news" into the discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 12:27 PM
Original message
Those who trivialize the actuality of the situation almost always overlook the most obvious factors
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
58. The most obvious starting point for approaching any situation

Is to confront oneself about one's role in it.

The only person whose behavior I can control is my own. Telling others how to behave is much less effective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #58
59. The multi-faceted problem of attempting to hold Power accountable
That's a simple moral truth...not just "telling others how to behave."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #42
47. You misunderstood me. I was talking about human population. I blame part of it on religion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. Okay, so we need a list of culprits

Your title said "corporations and capitalism" were to blame, but the bulk of your post was about overpopulation, and I did not know that corporations and capitalism were promoting overpopulation since developed countries have lower birth rates.

But, now, it's religion. Okay... we're going to need a list here.

Corporations
Capitalism
Sex
Religion

...anything else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
53. If this was capitalism you'd have a point
alas it is not.

Some elements of Capitalism.

1.- Monopolies would be broken down... alas no too big to fail.
2.- Government would protect local industry and actually encourage it.
3.- Free trade is between small producers, not large, multi national corporations.
4.- The economy does not depend on wild consumption
5.- Corporations are not people... and corporations should not be protected and cuddled by the state.

Oh and my favorite... those who pray at the church of Smith do not realize that the word is very critical of the Hand Of the Marketplace, which is mentioned ONCE in the whole book with multiple caveats.

Now if you said, Fascism, over consumption and corporations will kill the planet, you got no quibble from me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #53
56. Capitalism has no constraints. They buy government officials then wreak havoc on the planet without
repercussions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #56
60. Alas what you are describing is FASCISM
you know CORPORATISM. I know the propaganda, but this is not a free market as described by Adam Smith, you know the guy they pray at, but have not read the book from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #60
62. Mousalini's choice government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #62
63. Regardless, language matters
and if we are to change the world, we first have to use the correct language and call a spade a spade
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #63
68. Lets just call a shovel a fork
Have you ever read this?

http://www.publiceye.org/fascist/corporatism.html

Honestly, I find a HUGE difference between corporatism and fascism. In corporatism, the government exists to benefit private industry solely. In fascism, the people and private industry exist to benefit and edify the state.

There is overlap, without a doubt, but its a stretch to call the two concepts synonymous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
65. I emailed a similar point to MSNBC years ago & was shocked to get an interested response
Won't mention the show title. My premise was (& is) that over the last 40 years corporations have a primary role in determining where we live, our overall health & even what we can afford to eat. Many Americans are subjected to workplace injuries or illnesses based on the practices of their employers. Our medical & dental check-ups were based on our available health insurance & co-pays. If the job moves, the employees may have to move. If we live in areas seriously polluted by several types of industries, our children may have conditions or illnesses that they wouldn't otherwise have.

Certainly 40 years ago we had a great deal more liberty in choosing who we worked for, where we lived etc. But as the corporations have tilted the laws & loopholes in their favor, we've ended up as satellites orbiting around them. It's frightening. It's also laughable to hear the "free market" cheerleaders yakking about freedom. How many Americans have real employment choice & an achievable retirement?

Certain areas of this country have citizens who will have a particular lifestyle, a particular health history & a particular form of death (and life expectancy) significantly influenced by the corporations employing them.

Thanks for posting.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #65
67. We are all slaves to the current system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #67
69. Less so than you think
There is a mental addiction to the system, but unless someone is so indebted without the option of default (to the point you would be hunted down and jailed), most everyone could potentially pick up and leave the system, seeking out a low-tech agrarian communal existence. Its a scary concept, and may not appeal to everyone, but there is real escape.

My wife and I have discussed often moving out to an island close by the one we just moved to and just sort of leaving the race behind (more than I already have). Im not sure if we will reach that point or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #67
71. True, but even in very small small ways, like product selection
In the Stone Age, when I was "graduated" as a Systems Analyst, I achieved a comfortable salary level for the first time. I wanted to buy living room furniture that all matched, instead of the beer hall selection I had. There was a wide variety of furniture styles & upholstery fabrics available to me. I was never in "Martha Stewart's" league.

I recently received a catalog from Montgomery Ward & another from Sears (middle-class bastions) that were virtually identical, including item numbers, except for the covers. For those poor souls who shop at Wal-Mart, K-mart, Target, JC Penny etc. there are identical selections for bed, bathroom, living room curtains/linens. Same with kid's clothes.

5 years ago I purchased similar items online believing the selection was better, but I made a size error. Called the next day to modify the order & was snottily told that the items were "drop shipped" from Chinese/Mexican warehouses & couldn't be changed, but I could get an authorization number to return them. WTF?

Our commuting distances are determined by where we work & therefore our gasoline expenses...but I babble. You obviously know which is why you posted. I hope when I croak there's a decent coffin selection, not imported from you-know-where. Good grief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #67
72. No, you just lack the courage and conviction to stop participating
Edited on Fri May-14-10 02:52 PM by jberryhill
There are people which do.

For one thing, I gather you will abide by the birth moratorium you have proposed. That much should be easy for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
77. No doubt.....And if people don't wrap their brains around that quickly......Oh well.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Umbral Donating Member (969 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
80. Not life, just humanity and civilization as we know it. Life is remarkably resilient. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
87. Corporations gave Sociopaths a Purpose
Edited on Fri May-14-10 04:33 PM by fascisthunter
and today we live with the repercussions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #87
92. Complete destruction of the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MajorChode Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
94. I heard a streetcorner preacher screaming about armageddon the other day
That shit was funny too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
95. I think so, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC