Schakowsky added that there may be some kind of way to play around with the so-called public safety exception, which allows interrogators more pre-Miranda questioning in certain circumstances. But she said that if there were a way to do this, she hadn't heard about it yet from the administration or anyone else.
"I don't know if there's a way to clarify what a public safety exception would mean and how that would work," Schakowsky said, adding that she and other House Dems hadn't heard any specifics from the administration yet.
<...>
Separately, the chair of the House Judiciary Committee, John Conyers, poured a pail of cold water on criticism of Miranda at a hearing yesterday. And Conyers is not the kind of guy who does stuff he doesn't want to do, even if the administration is pushing him to do it.
It's always possible that key House Dems could warm to the idea -- if they see a specific proposal. But absent such a proposal, it's simply impossible to gauge whether it's even possible, let alone whether leading Dems will support it. And in any case, civil libertarians think that a battle over a change like this would go all the way to the Supreme Court.
Conyers"Although no specific proposals have been made," Conyers said in his remarks, "I believe the idea of such legislation is unnecessary and a mistake."