Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Latest Arizona Law

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bobbieo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 04:26 PM
Original message
Latest Arizona Law

Yuma Daily Sun
Saturday, May 15th, 2010
Gov. Jan Brewer has signed legislation spelling out that nothing requires businesses to provide “trained and competent” interpreters when a customer comes in speaking a language other than English.

So much for foreign tourism!!!! These “furners” really didn’t want to see the Grand Canyon, anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Travis_0004 Donating Member (417 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Isn't that how it is now?
Businesses have incentive to help customers who don't speak English, but I don't think anywhere requires them to provide that service.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbieo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. This law was passed to stop discrimination complaints. Good or bad - time will tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
62. Take your time. Think it through... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
D-Lee Donating Member (457 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
56. certain health entities ARE required to provide interpreters
Would have to take a look at the legislation to see if it runs afoul of other applicable provisions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. AZ needs a law requiring trained and competent ...
legislators and governors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. No matter if Brewer signs her rear end and posts it to the internets
racial discrimination is still illegal in the United States.

For now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbieo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I agree that this is a discrimination law aimed at Hipanics But, I honestly
believe anyone who wants to live in the US should make an attempt to learn to speak English for their own safety. I speak enough Spanish and French to get by in either Mexico or Quebec.

In defense of the dentist who was the target of the discrimination complaint, Sen. John Huppental (R) Chandler had this to say "Nobody should be treated like this, He was 'drug' through the mud by us"

Tsk, Tsk Senator!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I've lived around immigrants my entire life and never met anyone
who refused to learn English just to piss people off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbieo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. A very dear friend of mine from Mexico learned to speak English by watching American
"novelas" - soap operas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #15
24. That's cool. I try to keep my Spanish up with teevee
and what I hear is mondegreens for about the first fifteen minutes until my ear adjusts to the speed. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WolverineDG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. I've spoken Spanish just to watch heads explode
Edited on Sat May-15-10 07:36 PM by WolverineDG
Many in the US (& many on DU) feel that Spanish is an inferior language. And if anyone doesn't believe this attitude exists on DU, just do a quick search on teaching Spanish in particular or foreign languages in general & take note of all the "I don't mind my kid learning a foreign language, but not Spanish" posts.

dg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
59. Well, when I lived in SA, I ran into Americans who refused to learn
Spanish even though they were working there, however, I never met a person here in the States that didn't want to learn English. As a matter of fact if you speak their language they beg you to teach them English.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #59
67. I've known people who don't want to speak English in public
because they are ashamed of their accent. That's the opposite of being so unconcerned that you refuse to learn English. My grandmother was like that. She could read and hear and understand perfectly but never spoke English out in public. One of us always translated for her. Her accent wasn't ugly at all, actually. It was musical but she always hated it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-10 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #67
73. I've known people like that. They also think that Americans will make
fun of their accents. I knew a girl from Ecuador who was a trained surgical nurse, but she was working in a sweat shop in LA because she wouldn't speak English even though she knew it. She could have gotten a job in a hospital if she hadn't been so shy about her accent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinymontgomery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
63. My Grandparents come over
My Grandparents came over from Italy in the 20's so my mom was first generation American. My grandparents made sure my parents spoke english, but her and her eleven brothers and sisters also spoke Italian. They shifted into Italian when they didn't want the kids to know what they were saying. My grandparents didn't give up their heritage or identity. Our family our best to learn english as did (I wish I had learned Italian), and I don't see anything wrong with them ensuring I learned english to the best of my ability. So my brothers and sister are only 2nd generation Italians. (lots of the my first generation served in WWII on our side). I love Italy and can't wait to go back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. Is anyone claiming that business should be required to provide interpreters?

No business should have to provide interpretation for a customer. There are a lot of languages out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. But if you enter a good faith contract with someone
you better be sure they understand what they are reading. There are a lot of lawyers out there, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Perhaps, but it seems unreasonble to expect businesses to provide interpreters
Edited on Sat May-15-10 07:16 PM by aikoaiko
On the other hand, you are correct that a contract does require understanding. And since we have laws that deal with contracts it would seem to be unnecessary to require businesses to provide interpreters for this reason.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #12
35. In AZ, Spanish is by treaty co-equal with English but when
did we ever honor any treaty. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #35
40. I didn't know that. That changes things the issue considerably.


Do you know what treaty specified that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. It's the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo.
But, it might as well be written on the wind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. thank you. I learned something new.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
10. Why would businesses require such a thing anyway? There were
many places I went during my military career where the businesses didn't speak English. And yet, I managed to get around by carrying maps and doing a lot of pointing and gesturing. And, I learned some Spanish, Italian, and Japanese - not enough to hold a conversation, but enough to order food in restaurants and find out how to get to different places.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. The Navaho nation runs through Arizona.
I propose the Navaho language should be the required language of all inhabitants of Arizona. No one should be required to produce trained and competent personnel in English.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
political_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
13. Just all in a day's work for Frau Brewer.
Edited on Sat May-15-10 07:34 PM by political_Dem
As I read about more of these laws being passed in Arizona, the sadder I get. :(

But then again, it's only been 46 years since the Civil Rights Act has been passed. The stuff that is happening in Arizona now really reveals a lot in context of nearly five decades of U.S. history in regards to race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WolverineDG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
14. Meanwhile, in Europe
ATMs offer services in multiple languages & no one bitches about it.

dg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #14
29. In San Francisco many are in English, Spanish, Tagalog
and Chinese. So far, it hasn't killed anyone. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
16. so you would require businesses to have interpreters for every language on earth?
how about Klingon too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WolverineDG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. From a business perspective, if you get a lot of business from Mexico
wouldn't it behoove you to have employees who spoke Spanish? Or do you, like a lot of people, think that Spanish is an inferior language that only sub-humans speak?

dg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. I my town that would include Vietnamese, Tagalog, Chinese, Russian, Korean, etc...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WolverineDG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. And I'll bet businesses that cater to those groups
have someone who can speak those languages.

dg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #22
36. In Sac its referred to as Little Saigon, and they tend to shop at buisnesses...
operated by other Vietnamese, and funded by either Asian or Vietnamese money and we're good with that http://www.sacramentopress.com/headline/22209/Sacramento_Celebrates_Little_Saigon_at_Tet_Festival And of course, specific to the OP; some dentists not all but some do other diverse languages - but its more to the point that privately owned businesses aren't required to. Its almost as though you're implying that you have to speak Japanese to own a Toyota

A dentist in a private practice, unless contracted by a county entity, etc, is not so required. The county, state and fed agencies are and they are doing so. But its not like we're ordering burgers at the UN, and there'll be growing excursionary incidences of suits such as into privately owned businesses (which will end up cutting both ways) as a way of political protest. And that is too unproductive to entertain for very long

I think a question to consider - rather than trying to fit a square peg into a round hole - is if: you own a Burger King franchise in the states that is as a corporate model setup as catering to all *in* the states (the core element of a menu filled with pictures to point to, or the international symbol for restroom)...why would you hire staff that speaks no English whatsoever in a country where the vast bulk of commerce is conducted in English? Even *by* Mexicans

Today, in Walnut Creek, at a Barnes & Noble; my husband held the door open for Cambodian man & his young son. The man thanked my husband in English. My husband nodded holding his head lower as with a bow. Everyone smiled, including the little Cambodian boy. And for me, if for little other reason but that one: the union was a bit more perfect
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbieo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. I'm surprised this dentist in Yuma did not have a Spanish speaking assistant.
Most people around here do go to Mexico for a dentist but most busineses have someone on the presimses who speaks Spanish. There are alot of Mexican nationals who do business in Yuma and I see them all of the time at shopping centers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #17
26. Pima County gets more than a quarter of its income from Mexican shoppers, iirc. n/t
Edited on Sat May-15-10 07:56 PM by EFerrari
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbieo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #26
34. I know Tucson, EF lived there for 20 years, am a U oA alum.
and I sure miss the place There were only 39,000 people in Tucson when I moved there in 1944. My late husband worked for both bewspapers Star and Citizen, there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #34
43. Wow. So, you really do know Tucson.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #17
66. yes, but why should there be a law requiring it? and why do spanish speaking people
get special treatment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WolverineDG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #66
70. Ever hear of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo?
Puts Spanish & English on equal footing in the territory ceded by Mexico to the US. Got a problem with that "special treatment?" Tough. It's the law.

And why is it that you only hear Americans whining about "special treatment" for Spanish speakers, when in other countries, most people are multi-lingual & no one complains about it?

dg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #16
33. According to the treaty that ended the War and gave AZ to the US,
Spanish speakers were not to suffer any discrimination. Yeah, right! LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #33
47. The treaty also mentions provisions including protection of property and civil rights...
of Mexican nationals living within the new boundaries of the United States, the promise of the United States to police its boundaries, and compulsory arbitration of future disputes between the two countries - which others view as: assured political and religious liberty and the security of property to Mexicans who remained in the transferred territories. That, for some, may just be the law with its little widgety words that mean less until someone puts them to task. But I do not think that either way "living within new boundaries" or "remained in the transferred territories" infers a right to further cross, flow & subvert with intent, in the present, or establish a de facto Mexican state within the US, let's call it, oh, I dunno: Centro Aztlan - because of a continued displeasure with a war fought and lost long, long ago

Like the confederates down south are still pissy using their 'southern strategy' every chance they get x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WolverineDG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #47
51. that's why title to land in Texas is all screwed up
to the point where no one has absolutely clear title to their property.

dg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fla_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #16
39. Calling Sheldon Cooper
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
18. Well, businesses aren't - its a running joke for Americans to go to Paris...
and stumble their way half way through a Parisian menu without a hailstorm of French snide & scorn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hansel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #18
37. Arizona, USA's France.
How pissed off would that make these little right wing extremists. They can go back to eating French fries now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Confusious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
21. Here's the link
Edited on Sat May-15-10 07:40 PM by Confusious
Seems someone got sued for not providing an interpreter.

http://www.yumasun.com/news/interpreters-60963-phoenix-required.html

Nice way to hide the facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. it's kind of hard to trust that story's treatment of the facts
Granted, based on the information in that article it is appropriate that the discrimination suit was dismissed. But the article also talks about an "optometrist" who had "to spend time and money defending himself and his dental practice."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KonaKane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
27. AZ is in full attack mode against Hispanics.
I knew they were bad but I have never seen anything like this before. It seems surreal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
28. Man, they're just going balls-out to make Arizona
the most xenophobic, hostile shithole in the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
30. A spin on the "English Official Language" law -
- have to wonder if its businesses only or if it also includes city, counties and state. Providing translators in numerous languages is very expensive and these are hard times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
31. Two words: Sign language.
Three more words: Disability Act lawsuit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. I've worked with deaf persons before -
- and they have never requested a translator. It's my experience that the deaf community will either read your lips or they will communicate by computer or written word. Deafness does not prevent them from being able to communicate in English.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #32
38. I used to date a translator.
She worked at the Arizona School for the Deaf and Blind in Tucson. Some of her clients used ASL, but they were functionally illiterate in both written and spoken English (some were fluent in Spanish, others were mono-lingual), so that's who I specifically had in mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #38
53. This law appears to be about private sector businesses -
- and it would be impossible for every accountant, insurance agency, car repair shop, retail store, etc. to have access to someone knowing ASL just in the event that a deaf person comes into their business that day. When a deaf person is in need of a translator for such services, they bring their own with them. It appears this law makes it clear that anyone not speaking English do the same and not expect a private business to provide a translator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmoney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
44. It's not forbidding anyone from having interpreters
Edited on Sat May-15-10 09:03 PM by gmoney
It's just making it explicit that businesses are not REQUIRED to provide them. I'm sure that many businesses will choose to do so, at least in some capacity.

Probably also releases them from liability if someone signs a contract written in English, then comes back to say they didn't understand it, and that it was the business's responsibility to provide a translator.

No. Big. Deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. Exactly. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. Brewer might want to protect business owners from liability in that way
but I don't think she can do that. That's discrimination against non-English speakers and who knows what else. A civil rights attorney would.

And it is a big deal as a part of the racist attack on Latinos in Arizona at the moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmoney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. so every business needs a team of translators for all languages?
Not just someone who can speak it, but who can translate in a way that is legally accurate?

I believe technically, a business owner can't explain verbally the contents of a contract because of the risk of misinterpretation. It's the customer's responsibility to find a way of understanding it, even if it's in English (legalese) and the customer speaks English. If the business provides a translator, he runs the risk of the translation being inaccurate, incomplete or misunderstood, and the contract being nullified.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. Why would you need to get an interpreter for all languages
Edited on Sat May-15-10 10:18 PM by EFerrari
when you're in a state where 30% of the population is Latino? That doesn't even make sense. :)

ETA: This is obviously just more of the same from the racist AZ statehouse.


/typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmoney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. Because if you don't then it's also "racist" or whatever
If you make accommodation for Spanish, then the French speakers, or the Hindi speakers, or Portuguese, or Mandarin, or Arabic, or Urdu, or Navajo, or Esperanto, or yes even Klingon, will be able to demand the same accommodation.

"Oh, but 30% is Latino, that's substantial. The others aren't." -- that's discrimination, just what you think you're arguing against. But actually, you're arguing for it.

Let's not turn the SW United States into some sort of Spanish/English Quebec... the dual language requirement there seems like a huge pain in the "derriere" to me. (As informed by a Canadian friend of mine.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 02:06 AM
Response to Reply #50
52. Well, let's see. Expecting to accomodate Spanish speakers
in the Southwest is not racist, it's common sense for businesses.

And don't look now, but there's a lot of them there, no matter what the skinheads wish. They will be there long after this latest attack of bigotry has been booted out of office.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #50
55. Some people never step outside their comfort zone, where speaking Spanish isn't even...
what's really meant here - but the ability to speak fluent Chavez
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #48
54. I have experienced this and there are additional complications for businesses -
- such as when the translator leaves the business. We had a Spanish speaking person in our office for several years. We noticed that the huge majority of our Spanish speaking clients could also speak English when she was not available and they were forced to do so. There was a huge amount of wasted time and money with Spanish speakers coming in to "chat" with her as they enjoyed speaking in their native tongue. That was difficult to control without appearing rude to the client. The other problem was with written correspondence as any done in Spanish could not be read by the rest of our office. We had to require that correspondence had the text included in English so that all of us could determine what was going on should our translator not be in the office when the client called/came in. That meant that all work had to be done twice for anyone requesting that their correspondence be in Spanish.

When the translator left our firm we decided not to replace her due to the economy. When I advised one client that she was no longer with our firm, the client found enough English to cuss me up one side and down the other and then tell me that I needed to learn Spanish. I was astounded! Thankfully, the word "no" is the same in both languages.

When there is a large population of other than English speakers in a community, they soon open their own businesses. We found it more cost effective for them to do business elsewhere than to hire a translator and deal with the complications and their expense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmoney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #54
57. Makes sense
Thanks for sharing that anecdote. I think that's really the root of some of these "English is sufficient" efforts...that it's just too damned expensive and risky to try to accommodate every language.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #54
71. So, your vote is for segregation?
Good to know.

LOL

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-10 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #54
72. Yes, and I have one for you: used to work at a Gov research facility...
Knew a women, an exile from Chile very sort of Isabel/House of The Spirits, girl - spoke flawless Spanish having been born, raised and basically escaped from there, diplomat dad, long time well connected family & folks, etc - that had to first be 'certified' as a bi-lingual Spanish speaker so as to canvas that demographic in a scientifically consistent way able to support the sample absent all other bias or so it was thought, well...

Another friend of mine - a Mexican woman *from* Mexico, nice woman very hard stiff spine always nice to me but seldom less than somehow condescending; thorough predominately fair & just - in charge of 'the spanish speakers' discharged my Chilean friend because she felt Chile spoke some element less than 'high spanish' and so unable to represent *the Spanish speaking world*, hm, very well...

So I do I see that these "set all the nut brown handed spanish speakers of the world free & unite!" pseudo-revolutionaries don't seem to understand the levels of caste system they are actually arguing in favor of

So that with, "the client found enough English to cuss me up one side and down the other and then tell me that I needed to learn Spanish" you've put your fingertip onto the very nature of the dichotomous argument itself filled with prejudices - all-be-them Spanish speaking prejudices
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
58. Last time I was at the Grand Canyon, I heard a lot of German and
Japanese. But I don't think those are the interpreters that Gov. Brewer had in mind. However, most businesses find it's good business to be able to communicate with potential customers and will hire people who are bi-lingual. That woman is getting crazier and crazier. I hope AZ can get rid of her before she does too much damage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
60. ¡Bésamelo! Then I refuse to speak English in Arizona.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
61. I need help. How do you say: Que Pendeja! in English?
Oktnx.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntPatsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #61
64. What an asshole...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #64
65. Gracias! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntPatsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #65
68. Que' Nada
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
69. Ya vol... by the way piece of trivia Guvernor
what language ALMOST became the official one? If you said English, go back to school, just NOT in Arizona.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC