Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-V.T.) on Sunday threw a bit of cold water on chatter that the administration would seek a legislative fix to expand the amount of time a terrorist suspect could be interrogated without reading Miranda warnings.
Congressional action isn't out of the realm of possibility, Leahy said. But the scope of what lawmakers could do is limited by the fact that the Supreme Court has ruled Miranda warnings to be a constitutional right.
"I sat down and talked with the president about this," Leahy said during an appearance on ABC's "This Week." "The question is not so much whether I'm concerned about the civil rights one way or another, it is what a court will agree to. After all, it was the Supreme Court that set down the rules of Miranda. Whatever changes might be made, have to made within the confines of what the United States Supreme Court has already said.
"I think the president and
Eric Holder understand that," he added. "Certainly there is an emergency doctrine that allows you -- if you have taken somebody in custody who is a terrorist -- to continue to question them for a period of time without them being presented to a magistrate or being given the Miranda warning. And certainly in the last several cases of people who have been apprehended we have gotten tremendous -- and are continuing to get tremendous -- information from those people...I think you have to have maximum flexibility within the rules, but the idea that you're going to be able to pass a statute to change a Constitutional ruling of the Supreme Court, you can't do that."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/05/16/pat-leahy-throws-cold-wat_n_577824.html
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
