Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Feds Ignored Louisiana Concerns about Experimental Chemicals Used against Oil Slick

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-10 09:02 AM
Original message
Feds Ignored Louisiana Concerns about Experimental Chemicals Used against Oil Slick
Feds Ignored Louisiana Concerns about Experimental Chemicals Used against Oil Slick

The federal government approved BP’s use of chemicals to break up the oil from the Deepwater Horizon spill despite concerns from scientists and public officials in Louisiana.

When the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) discussed the choice of using chemical dispersants to keep the enormous oil slick from washing up on coastal shorelines, Louisiana’s top environmental people questioned the strategy, insisting there was too much unknown about the impact of the chemicals on aquatic life.

“We’re very disappointed in their approach,” Robert Barham, head of the state’s Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, told the Telegraph. “The federal procedures call for a consensus between federal authorities, the responsible party and the states involved. When we met and expressed our concerns, apparently they decided to go without us.”

Added Alan Levine, head of Louisiana’s Department of Health and Hospitals: “We don’t have any data or evidence behind the use of these chemicals in the water. We’re now basically using one of the richest ecosystems in the world as a laboratory.”

EPA also has come under scrutiny for approving the use of two dispersants that aren’t as highly rated as others for effectiveness or safety. In fact, about a dozen other government-approved dispersants have tested better for breaking up petroleum in water while not causing as much harm to ocean species.

http://www.allgov.com/Top_Stories/ViewNews/Feds_Ignored_Louisiana_Concerns_about_Experimental_Chemicals_Used_against_Oil_Slick_100517
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bragi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-10 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. Of course dispersants work
Dispersants work very well in hiding big oil catastrophes from media and public view.

As for long term harm from them, that is an absurd concern in any society that believes it can extract oil from a mile below the ocean surface and not eventually despoil the ocean and its shorelines.

We are now at war with our oceans, and I believe we have the ability to win this war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC