Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Effort to Raise Oil-Spill Liability Fails in Senate (Update1)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-10 11:01 AM
Original message
Effort to Raise Oil-Spill Liability Fails in Senate (Update1)
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601072&sid=asE4RNMDTGqY

May 14 (Bloomberg) -- Backers of legislation to raise the economic-damage liability cap for oil companies to $10 billion plan to seek passage through the committee process after the legislation failed to win expedited approval yesterday.

Senator Robert Menendez of New Jersey, a sponsor of the bill, said he plans to push for the Senate’s Environment and Public Works committee to take up the measure, which could lead to a full Senate debate on it.

“There’s going to be other avenues to get this to the floor,” Menendez said. “I believe we are going to get a vote on this.”

The measure, introduced in response to the widening oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, proposed increasing the existing liability cap of $75 million by more than 130 times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-10 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good luck with that.

This is capitalism, baby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-10 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I am having a strong negative reaction to the BP pic on your post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-10 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Is that good or bad?

Anger is appropriate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-10 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Appropriate for the gusher, yes.
the image of the man who was shot in the head in Viet Nam, that is a different reaction.
I really do not care for it as it is used here.

EOM


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-10 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. The article doesn't seem to match the headline
it seems the Senate failed to speed up passage, but overall the bill still seems to be on track.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC