Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Top Kill": The "New" BP Leak Stop Solution that Just May Work...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-10 08:37 PM
Original message
"Top Kill": The "New" BP Leak Stop Solution that Just May Work...
From the "Oil & Gas Journal"



Note: A 4000 x 2253 pixel image here: http://tinyurl.com/2fzshk4



May 16, 2010
Paula Dittrick
Senior Staff Writer

HOUSTON, May 16

BP plans to kill flow in 7-10 days



Kent Wells, BP senior vice-president of exploration and production, said BP’s first priority remains to kill the flow from the well. An effort to pump kill mud into the wellhead through choke and kill lines on the existing blowout preventer will be attempted in 7-10 days, Wells told reporters on May 16.

He also clarified that a “junk shot” in which various items will be pumped inside the BOP might or might not be done. Wells said the first plan is to try to stop the flow using kill mud followed by cement to seal the well.

“We can pump mud faster than the well can flow,” Wells said, adding the mud will go through the choke and kill lines.

A control pod was retrieved from the BOP and was brought to the surface where it’s being reconfigured to ensure that BP can electronically control a series of valves in the choke and kill lines while it pumps mud into the well.

Wells said 50,000 bbl of kill mud will be available, but that he doubts that much will be needed.
Contact Paula Dittrick at pauld@ogjonline.com

http://www.ogj.com/index/article-display/2867244755/articles/oil-gas-journal/general-interest-2/2010/05/100516-pd-bpspill-riserworking.html


The graphic indicates that the existing BOP can be used to pump kill mud, then cement, to seal the well head.

Why they didn't try this in the first place is beyond me.

7-10 days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Go2Peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-10 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why didn't they do it earlier? Because of greed? Hoping to keep access to the oil maybe?
Edited on Mon May-17-10 08:47 PM by Go2Peace
Once they seal it nobody is going to approve a re-drill for a very long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-10 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Yes.
I been suggesting that for two weeks. Many "explained" why it couldn't be done. Who am I to argue?

Whatever the case, I'm more happy that this solution exists than mad that it wasn't tried sooner.

But I'm still mad.

:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Go2Peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-10 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I am feeling better that they are actually going to do it
beats the alternative anyway. I was afraid this might go on for longer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-10 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Because they were trying to recover the well, not plug it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-10 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. You can trust a man when his last name is his profession!
Ah a Wells man, I see...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cetacea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-10 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Fingers crossed.
Edited on Mon May-17-10 08:56 PM by Cetacea
k+R

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-10 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. Is the picture "saying" this BOP cross section
Edited on Mon May-17-10 08:51 PM by Trillo
is already on the well head?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-10 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I'm fairly certain that it is, yes.
Note that the damaged pipe is present at the top of the graphic.

That bent pipe originally went straight up, like a straw to the Deepwater Horizon platform, now burned and ruined.

The riser collapsed to the sea floor and oil continues to gush out at three points.

If this image was a new device, I'm pretty sure that bent riser would not be there.

Odd, isn't it?

Such a simple solution, would have been so quick to do days after the event, one would think.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC