Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jewish Democratic Group Asks Syndicate to Drop Buchanan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-18-10 01:43 PM
Original message
Jewish Democratic Group Asks Syndicate to Drop Buchanan
http://mediamatters.org/strupp/201005180030

Jewish Democratic Group Asks Syndicate to Drop Buchanan

May 18, 2010 1:35 pm ET by Joe Strupp


The latest critique of Pat Buchanan's controversial column on Elena Kagan and the number of Jews on the U.S. Supreme Court comes from the National Jewish Democratic Council.

The column, published last week, stated: "If Kagan is confirmed, Jews, who represent less than 2 percent of the U.S. population, will have 33 percent of the Supreme Court seats. Is this the Democrats' idea of diversity?"

The NJDC on Tuesday sent a letter to Creators Syndicate, which distributes Buchanan's column to nearly 200 newspapers, asking the syndicate to drop Buchanan and remove the column.

"We ask that you pull down Buchanan's latest column from your website and that you stop publishing his over-the-top, conspiratorial screeds," the letter says, in part. "During these challenging times, it is more important than ever that we hold ourselves to a higher standard. Help us end the practice of promoting ethnic and religious divisiveness by removing this ugly column today."

Creators declined comment when contacted by Media Matters for America, but said no newspapers have dropped Buchanan since the controversial column was distributed. It declined to say how many newspapers had run that specific column.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
brewens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-18-10 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. You might ask the same question about Clarence Thomas.
What percentage of Americans are "Uncle Tom N.....s"? Nowhere near the 11% that we have on the SCOTUS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuvNewcastle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-18-10 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't like it when the Court
is arbitrarily divided and certain inconsequential facts about the Justices are used to define it. We could divide the Court by race, religion, college they went to, region they are from, etc. It all becomes kind of silly and tiresome and, in the end, doesn't amount to squat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-18-10 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. I don't think they should pull Der Pattenfuhrer's article from the website.
I think they should leave it there to continue disgracing them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC