Three Generations, No Imbeciles: Eugenics, the Supreme Court, and Buck v. Bell

[madmusic]

From Booklist
A 1927 U.S. Supreme Court ruling, Buck v. Bell, approved laws allowing states to sterilize the “feebleminded” to keep them from having children. The case involved Carrie Buck, whose mother and daughter—like Carrie—had been adjudged “feebleminded.” At a time of growing debate about the practice of eugenics, feebleminded was a label freely and frequently given to prostitutes, illegitimate children, and epileptics, as well as the mentally deficient. For a period, Carrie and her mother were both residents of the Colony, a facility that practiced the segregation and sterilization policies prevalent at the time. Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., in writing the decision, declared that “three generations of imbeciles are enough.” The decision set in motion more than 60,000 sterilizations. Law professor Lombardo draws on 25 years of research, including interviews with Buck before she died, her medical and school records, correspondence with her attorneys, and other documents to support the claim that the case was a fraud against a poor girl who had been raped. An engrossing look at a shameful case. --Vanessa Bush

http://www.amazon.com/Three-Generations-No-Imbeciles-Eugenics/dp/0801890101

[jwirr]

1. Edwin Black's "War Against the Weak" is a great history of that era.

[Odin2005]

2. groups like Autism Speaks support the return of Eugenics...

...under the name "pre-natal screening". They even support giving us chemical castration drugs because of claims that they "reduce autistic behaviors". :puke:

If they get their way anyone with "abnormal" cognition will be treated as a cancer on society.

[AnnieBW]

3. Looking at the Teabaggers, I would say that

We just keep creating more imbeciles.

(For the record, I do not support eugenics or forced sterilization. But I do support pre-screening for genetic anomalies.)