Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate Progressives Finally Push Back Against Lincoln-Kyl Tax Cut For Multimillionaires - ThinkProg

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-10 06:31 PM
Original message
Senate Progressives Finally Push Back Against Lincoln-Kyl Tax Cut For Multimillionaires - ThinkProg
Senate Progressives Finally Push Back Against Lincoln-Kyl Tax Cut For Multimillionaires
By Pat Garofalo at 7:00 pm

<snip>

I’ve been complaining that Sens. Blanche Lincoln (D-AR) and Jon Kyl’s (R-AZ) quest to cut the estate tax — spending up to $80 billion to reduce tax bills for the richest of the rich — has suffered from a severe lack of perspective. No one in Congress has been questioning whether the estate tax is, in fact, too low, or whether there are far better things to do with that much money. Fortunately, today, Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and Bob Casey (D-PA) provided a modicum of reason:

CASEY: I think it would be a big mistake when everyone’s yelling about spending and deficits to let a lot of very wealthy people get off the hook.

SANDERS: The idea that we would make significant exemptions within the estate tax to give more tax breaks to the top three-tenths of 1% is nauseating. I will do everything I can to stop that.


Casey also added that “the idea that we’re going to give an incredible economic advantage to less than 1 percent of our taxpaying population is really offensive to me, to understate it dramatically.”

It’s about time that some lawmakers began to say that spending $80 billion to provide a tax cut to the richest 0.2 percent of households is an absurd waste of money. (62.5 percent of estate tax revenue comes from estates worth more than $20 million.) Objections from Democratic lawmakers, in fact, seem to have scuttled a deal that Lincoln and Kyl had worked out yesterday with the Senate Finance Committee’s chairman and ranking member, Sens. Max Baucus (D-MT) and Charles Grassley (R-IA).

Of course, Republicans are now complaining about Democrats blowing up whatever agreement was in place yesterday. “We no longer have an agreement, because the Democratic side has decided that unless a matter has a guaranteed majority of Democratic votes going in, they’re not going to allow it on the floor, at least not voluntarily,” said Kyl. “It’s very frustrating because we thought we had a deal,” added Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT). “We thought we put it together in a way we thought was acceptable, and the Democrats are backing off on resolving it.”

But it’s worth remembering that it was Republicans who, in their zeal to slash the estate tax, scuttled a compromise offered to them in December. At that time, Baucus wanted to permanently set the estate tax at the 2009 level of 45 percent with a $3.5 million exemption (as opposed to letting the law run its course, which has the currently expired tax coming back next year at a 55 percent rate with a $1 million exemption). But Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and Kyl blocked that move, leaving the current law untouched.


Lincoln today characterized her and Kyl’s cut as a “reasonable compromise.” But it isn’t. It is the furthest right-wing position, short of complete repeal. Accepting a permanent extension at the 2009 level was a compromise (to which the House of Representatives has already agreed). There’s no reason for the Senate to swallow Lincoln-Kyl, simply because they’ve been the loudest voices on this issue.

<snip>

Link: http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2010/05/19/senate-estate-finally/

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-10 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good news! Lincoln's Blue Dog butt is finished. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SocialistLez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-10 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. Too bad many in AR will be mad she isn't cutting taxes
Most of them don't realize they will NEVER be in that income bracket and it's stupid to think they ever will be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC