Freedom as White Supremacy"
he doesn’t actually favor segregated lunch counters,
he just thinks it would be wrong to do anything about them."
http://tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/05/rand-paul-defends-criticism-of-civil-rights-act-to-rachel-maddow.php?ref=fpaIt seems that yesterday US Senate candidate Rand Paul let the cat out of the bag and admitted that under his brand of libertarian conservatism he can’t support the 1964 Civil Rights Act
http://thinkprogress.org/2010/05/19/paul-civil-rights/ or other non-discrimination legislation as applied to private businesses. He goes out of his way to explain that
he doesn’t actually favor segregated lunch counters, he just thinks it would be wrong to do anything about them. Similarly, I suppose the Cato Institute’s Dan Mitchell would tell you he doesn’t actually want poor children to suffer from starvation or malnourishment he just thinks it’s folly to try to do anything about it collectively. Maybe private charity will feed kids, or maybe not. Maybe voluntary action will undue Jim Crow, or maybe not.
The point to make about Paul, however, is that what he suffers from here is an excess of honesty and ideological rigor not an unusual degree of racism. Basic free market principles really do lead one to the absurd conclusion that
government regulation of private business is a greater evil than institutionalized segregation. That’s why Barry Goldwater, William F Buckley, the Young Americans for Freedom, and the other progenitors of the postwar conservative movement all opposed the Civil Rights Act and the civil rights movement. And, indeed, under the kind of hyper-restrictive construction of the constitution that today’s rightwingers use to say the Affordable Care Act is unconstitutional, the Civil Rights Act would probably also be invalidated.
Update It's worth noting that not only does Paul oppose the Civil Rights Act, but plenty of mainstream libertarian institutions that are far too savvy to actually spend time denouncing the Civil Rights Act are enthusiastic about Paul and his brand of politics.
more:
http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2010/05/freedom-as-white-supremacy.phphttp://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/05/20/rand-paul-tells-maddow-th_n_582872.htmlhttp://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/politics/wire/sns-ap-us-rand-paul-civil-rights,0,4122237.storyRand Paul Aide Quits Over MySpace Racism, ‘Afro-Americans’ Have ‘KKK Radar’
http://chattahbox.com/us/2009/12/18/rand-paul-aide-quits-over-myspace-racism-afro-americans-have-kkk-radar/VIDEO:
http://www.queerty.com/rand-paul-abhors-racism-supports-private-businesses-right-to-discriminate-on-race-20100520/The trouble with Dr. Paul is that despite his independent thinking, much of what he stands for is repulsive to people in the mainstream. For instance, he holds an unacceptable view of civil rights, saying that while the federal government can enforce integration of government jobs and facilities, private business people should be able to decide whether they want to serve black people, or gays, or any other minority group.http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/27155http://barefootandprogressive.blogspot.com/2010/01/chip-saltsman-rumors-are-true.html