Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Right and Wrong About Arizona Law (& "attrition through enforcement")

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 10:36 AM
Original message
Obama Right and Wrong About Arizona Law (& "attrition through enforcement")
http://www.truthout.org/obama-right-and-wrong-about-arizona-law59357

The new anti-illegal immigrant law in Arizona highlights the two dueling strategies to address what is commonly regarded as a broken immigration system: comprehensive immigration reform (CIR) and "attrition through enforcement."

The responsible strategy, according to the president, would be a CIR. The centerpiece of such a reform would be a pathway to citizenship for the existing illegal immigrant population. While proponents differ on the mix, a CIR package would likely include the following components in addition to legalization: increased border security measures, biometric identification or some system of worker verification, tough immigration enforcement and a new guest-worker program.

Among liberals and CIR advocates, the Arizona law is regarded as yet another reason why the federal government needs to act quickly to pass immigration reform. But the passing of the harsh law also highlighted the seemingly unstoppable march of the attrition through enforcement agenda.

With the prospects for CIR fading - even as the new "tough but fair" version of CIR is loaded with border security, immigration enforcement and "get right with the law" provisional legalization measures - the attrition through enforcement approach to the country's immigration policy crisis has become the prevailing response.

The Arizona law is the latest manifestation of the attrition through enforcement strategy advocated by immigration restrictionists and allied conservatives. Like most nonviolent, nonvigilante strategies to address what is regarded as "mass immigration," the latest legislative initiative in Arizona did not emerge independently, but can be readily traced to the research, analysis and policy advocacy of the restrictionist policy institutes in Washington, DC. These are the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), NumbersUSA and Center for Immigration Studies (CIS).

Although all three institutes have been leading voices of the attrition through enforcement response to illegal immigration, the restrictionist think-tank CIS can be credited as being the first to articulate the logic and dimensions of this strategy. In April 2006, CIS published a policy backgrounder titled http://www.cis.org/Enforcement-IllegalPopulation">"Attrition through Enforcement: A Cost-Effective Strategy to Shrink the Illegal Population."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC