Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does the federal government have the skill set or expertise to fix the oil spill?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 12:55 PM
Original message
Does the federal government have the skill set or expertise to fix the oil spill?
BP doesn't seem to know what they're doing.

Could the US take on a role in constructing some kind of solution to the geyser in the gulf?

I know that the Army Corps of Engineers can do some amazing things, but this is pretty specialized work. Could they take this on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. No, they don't
That should change now, though. The Oil companies, though required by law to be prepared, have demonstrated they are in no way prepared for such a fiasco.

Now, a federal level oil spill rapid response team needs to be formed, needs to train, and needs to do it all on the dime of the oil companies.

Next time, the Feds should handle it.

The tough part will be getting it through Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyFingerPop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. I can't imagine that they do.
But they certainly have the skill set to mobilize the right people from other oil services companies to stop the gusher.

BP really has no incentive....75 million? So what. Potentially 10 billion? So what. They are richer than God, and since Exxon is still thriving, their reputation will not be harmed to the point where they are driven out of business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. I trust BP and other industry engineers over the Army Corp of Engineers.
I have zero confidence in BP execs. But I don't distrust their engineers. The inability to staunch the flow is due to the severity of the problem, IMO, not incompetence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katzenjammers Donating Member (147 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. I'm an engineer in a related field and I mostly agree with you, but
as the bean counters are obviously trying to mitigate their corporate losses, which is their job, but any claims that their actions are deliberately either refusing to work on the problem or silencing their own engineers is just stupid. There was certainly some gambling on how to maximize profits
which is the way every business operates but no way would even the topcats ever want the negative publicity they've already gotten even to end up with a high production well. They might be amoral, but they're not idiots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. You live in "that world" where...
Edited on Thu May-20-10 01:09 PM by CoffeeCat
...a big, greedy, sickening corporation makes a mistake--and someone
comes in and makes it all better.

Well, see--the world has changed right under our noses. We now live
in a new world where bribed politicians allow big, greed, sickening
corporations to operate in any fashion they choose. So what if they're
engaging in operations, so dangerous, that there is virtually no fix
for the damage! Those corporations paid for the freedom to destroy
anything and everything they want, regardless of who it kills or the
destruction it leaves.

"That world", the world that makes sense, in which "We The
People" run a democracy, is gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. No but someone in the Federal Government should be leading this effort
Someone needs to be telling BP and their contractors who the fuck is in charge here.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texastoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Wouldn't it have been nice if we had a plan in place before this?
Because I'm not sure anyone knows what the fuck to do.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_Lawyer09 Donating Member (690 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #8
34. And the bummer is, this was a big deal during the Carter admin.
We were extremely proactive at that time, and then energy independence languished. All the agencies that provide big time knowledge, obersight, and regulation have been systematically gutted since 1980. Read the Thomas Franks book, "The Wrecking Crew" for some good and interesting back story. Constant privatization has slowly but surely put the Feds at the mercy of the corporations. The federal govt. has succumbed to group think on a large scale, and over reliance on the same 'ol experts. Look what happened when the DOS instituted the debaathification process in Iraq. Made millions of new enemies overnight.

Realistically we are facing so many crisis right now that I don't think we are ready or equipped to respond adequately too one. I guarantee there are many braniacs, probably eccentrics out there whom have some awesome engineering ideas/expertise that will never be heard. Why? Because BP execs and many beholden govt. officials prefer a leak proof echo chamber regardless of the tragic damage. The only truth I believe in now, is that environmental challenges in the future will become our number one concern. They are coming. We can be ready or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
6. Apparently not.
In the past few weeks someone(?) in the administration admitted that the gov't does not have that kind of expertise and/or equipment, at least not for deep water drilling. It might have been Napolitano.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. maybe we need something like NASA but for the oceans
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
36. Actually, NASA does research earth science
Research Flights Take NASA Scientists Over Gulf Oil Spill

A team from NASA's Langley Research Center in Hampton, VA, made research flights over the Gulf of Mexico this week to help investigate potential uses of satellites for monitoring the thickness and dispersal of oil spills and the oil¹s impact on marine life.

The flights were part of a NASA-wide mobilization of its remote-sensing assets to help assess and research the spread and impact of the Deepwater Horizon BP oil spill. Langley's King Air B-200, outfitted with two sensing instruments, flew Monday and Tuesday over the oil slick created by the explosion of a drilling rig nearly three weeks ago.

Data gathered during the flights will underpin a new effort to use satellite data to enhance monitoring and detection of oil spills. Other measurements taken during the flights could be used to observe the ecological impact of the oil spill by observing the density of phytoplankton – critical in the marine food chain – in Gulf waters.

more-

http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/hsrl-oilspill.html

I know this wasn't what you meant, but at least they're involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
9. Yes.
Lots of people other than BP understand what's going on here.

Our military certainly has the capacity to plug the damn thing, if they were ordered to do so.

It's likely that only companies like BP have the equipment necessary and the experience to make repairs that would preserve the capability to continue tapping the oil reserve, but if that was not a concern, the thing could be stopped using more drastic measures.

What is happening now is unacceptable. This is fucking bullshit, and BP should be nationalized and destroyed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lib2DaBone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
10. ... the Feds are stretched beyond breaking point...
with two wars escalating in the mideast, the DNC push for another war in Iran, relief effort in Haiti and a treasury that is bankrupt...

All it will take is another 8.0 Earthquake in the U.S. , and we are on our own... the calvary isn't coming... because all our resources have been shipped offshore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. It would not take many people to accomplish.
A group of specialists sink an explosive device just big enough to seal the hole, and be done with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Yea, lets just blow it up, what could possibly go wrong?!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Not much actually.
There's two and a half miles of rock between the sea floor and the oil reservoir. It would not be that difficult to seal it off at the sea floor.

The problem is that they aren't interested in sealing it off. They want to get the oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katzenjammers Donating Member (147 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. That's nonsense. If that were their only criterion, they would have plugged and plumbed it already.
If it wouldn't be 'that difficult', perhaps you should share your expertise with someone who can utilize it?

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Sure no problem. I'm ready to go.
You don't think a properly sized and properly placed explosive charge could crush that pipe and put enough debris on top of it to seal it up? I disagree.

If we could build a Saturn 5 over 40 years ago, we can seal that fucking hole today. What's happened to American ingenuity?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katzenjammers Donating Member (147 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. So you have it all figured out and yet you sit in your chair telling DU what a genius you are
instead of proposing your magic solution to ...BP or the EPA or to your congressman, to the President or to the Coast Guard or Martha Stewart. Nice priorities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. How do you know I haven't?
Don't get your knickers in a twist. I have contacted several agencies, and the White House, and a group called Innocentive that's looking for solutions.

Please don't assume to know what I have or haven't done. How the fuck would you know? Brainstorming is always good. If I'm wrong, oh well.

What's your idea? Give up and gnash your teeth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #13
33. Horse shit.
Use your brain for a minute. If its the oil they were interested in, plugging it up would ensure that the oil stays where it is instead of being unleashed into the ocean. Plugging it up wouldn't stop them from redrilling for it again (given offshore drilling doesn't get banned because of all this). Add that to the fact that they are losing a lot more money by not plugging it up and what you are alluding too makes absolutely no sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katzenjammers Donating Member (147 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. Who will indemnify them? Lloyds of London? Fat fucking chance.
Edited on Thu May-20-10 07:01 PM by katzenjammers
Yeah, let's just make the hole BIGGER
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #19
29. Don't be such a drama queen.
Like I said, there's two and a half miles of rock between the sea floor and the reservoir.

It could be sealed with explosives. It's actually been done before. I'm not nuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katzenjammers Donating Member (147 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Well, I may be a drama queen but I'm also an engineer with a lot of experience in drilling deep
holes in the upper layers of the lithosphere and I'm pretty sure that precipitous activation of high explosives in or around a vertical fracture isn't the most intelligent way to fix the problem. I never said you were nuts, you're just wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #31
37. Yeah, well I'll show you.
I'll snorkle down there with a couple sticks of dynamite in my teeth, and take care of this real quick.

I'll need bus fare to get down there though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katzenjammers Donating Member (147 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #37
42. HAHAHA....point to you!
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
14. Chris Matthews covered this topic on Hardball today.
In the first half hour of the program he spoke with a woman from National Geographic who explained very well who has the resources to deal with this kind of thing and who does not. The U.S. government does not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dems_rightnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Who did she say does?
BP?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Japan, France, China, and Russia.
Edited on Thu May-20-10 06:54 PM by moondust
Apparently those governments have some deep water capabilities.

She said basically the oil industry has the most advanced equipment and expertise in the U.S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #16
40. Well, we know Russia's solution
Russian paper suggests ‘nuclear explosion’ could cap gulf oil geyser
http://rawstory.com/rs/2010/0504/russian-paper-suggests-nuclear-explosion-cut-gulf-oil-geyser/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. The US Navy deep sub Alvin could likely do the job.
It would need to be outfitted with the right tools for the job. The thing can dive to 15,000 feet.

I could show them what to do, and I'm certainly no expert. What's solely lacking here is a little common sense.

This is bullshit! :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. I'd recommend that you watch the Hardball clip when available. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. I will, thanks.
I got rid of my TeeVee, so I'll look for it online.

Hardball and similar corporate propaganda programs are the reason I ditched the tube though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4 t 4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #23
25.  if they did
wouldn't they have done it by now? just saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Probably not. It makes too much sense.
What you're seeing now is a bunch of self-serving assholes engaged in a huge clusterfuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katzenjammers Donating Member (147 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. A major worldwide corporation with the goal of eviscerating itself?
Maybe you shouldn't smoke that stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. heh
What we have is a company that is ruining the gulf, and what do they say?

"No big deal"

They are going down. They know they are going down and they don't care. If they cared they wouldn't have made this mistake. They don't care about the gulf, they never did.

They are eviscerating BP.

The sums of money that it will take to fix this problem are more than BP can ever afford. In a year, there will not be a BP. BP is going down and going down by its own hand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #23
41. Here's the link.
Edited on Thu May-20-10 10:23 PM by moondust
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036697/ns/msnbc_tv-hardball_with_chris_matthews#37262847

Sylvia Earle, oceanographer, comes on at 4:35.

She does mention the Alvin once but doesn't elaborate and doesn't sound too optimistic about dealing with this thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
28. We need Dirk Pitt, Al Giordino...
And the folks from NUMA.

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recovered Repug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #28
38. They'd only get involved if this was part of a plan
for world domination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gravity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
30. The government would hire the same engineers working on it now
but they will be the ones paying the bills and taking the blame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
39. No, but they can find out who IS
There are hundreds of specialty oil service companies out there. I think I read about a few who specialized in just this sort of thing.

BP made the mess. They're going to pay for it. But there's no earthly reason why THEY get to try and solve the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
43. Does the federal government have the skill set or expertise to fix the oil spill?
NO.

Does the federal government have the skill set or expertise to fix the systemically entrenched, financial "Killer Bee Colony" from collapsing the global economy?

NO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC