Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Blackwater is just the tip of the iceberg!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 01:37 PM
Original message
Blackwater is just the tip of the iceberg!
President Bush opened the floodgates for outsourcing government jobs, and we're still reeling from the effects. Blackwater (now known as Xe), Halliburton, DynCorp, KBR, and Triple Canopy are just some of the multitude of private, for-profit corporations that became integral parts of the American war machine during the simultaneous Iraq and Afghanistan wars.

There is already legislation that has been introduced to tackle some of this problem. The Stop Outsourcing Security Act would prohibit the American government from using mercenaries to fight our wars.

But military contractors are just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to reckless government outsourcing.

We have an opportunity to change direction. The Obama administration is seeking public comments on the definition of "inherently governmental" functions, which sets the parameters government-wide for what can and cannot be outsourced.

Submit a public comment to the Office of Federal Procurement Policy.

http://act.credoaction.com/campaign/inherently_gov/?r=5569&id=9248-1026735-nx8.A0x

Please click on the link and submit your objections to the office off procurement purchasing ANYTHING from outside the US that can possibly be purchased here! It's about time we showed some protectionism!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nuclear Unicorn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. But the corporations in the OP are domestic
just sayin'

Maybe a better tack would be to stop using companies with unethical, if not illegal, business practices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Haliburton is not domestic.
It moved offshore to Dubai.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jp11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'd say if we want to or decide to outsource something we still get to have control or
prosecute them for failing to adhere to set guidelines or particulars of a contract. What sense does it make to hire blackwater to provide security and not have them answer to the US military commanders they are working with? If we are going to outsource anything the government or whomever hires them should still retain the power to dictate how they operate or in what regard they do so, if they don't like it don't sign the contract. Should they refuse to carry out their contract they'd pay significant penalties and certain actions would constitute criminal prosecution and perhaps even war crimes.

I'd rather not outsource government jobs because of what likely will happen with lax oversight and review of the outsourced positions but if we 'have' to do it or try it we shouldn't just send them a check and trust they do it 'right'.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. Our NUMBER #1 problem is the outsourcing of our elections largely to ONE far-rightwing-connected
corporation--ES&S, which just bought out Diebold and thus gained an 80% monopoly over the U.S. voting machine 'market.' All vote counting in the U.S. is now run on 'TRADE SECRET' programming owned and controlled largely by this one PRIVATE corporation, with virtually no audit/recount controls. ES&S is even worse than Diebold on its connections to the nutball 'christian' right.

There are two kinds of "outsourcing"--the "outsourcing" whereby big corporate monopolies pull up stakes in the U.S. and take the jobs to the cheapest, most unprotected labor markets abroad, and the government "outsourcing" what should be government-run, and democratically controlled, services, such as the postal service, security services and military logistics (food, housing, transportation). These can be "outsourced" to domestic corporations or foreign corporations (as the Bush Junta tried to do to our port facilities), but it is still "outsourcing," even if a U.S.-based corporation benefits. A subset of this government "outsourcing" is government purchases, which can be appropriate or not, depending on oversight and the fairness of the contracts.

THE most egregious example of government "outsourcing" is the 'TRADE SECRET' voting machines, because it is so very, very, VERY anti-democratic. This has also been a form of corporate "outsourcing," in that ES&S has been manufacturing its touchscreen voting machines for the U.S. 'market' in sweatshops in the Philippines! (See Dan Rather's "The Trouble With Touchscreens," www.HD.net.) This horrendous assault on the most fundamental power mechanism in our democracy--the mechanism by which gives "we, the people" exercise our sovereign power--has gone virtually unnoticed and unprotested by our corpo-fascist press and our Democratic Party leaders. It's no wonder then that the Bushwhacks were able to virtually "outsource" the entire government, with unbelievably corrupt actions such as no-bid military contracts, worth billions of dollars, to Dick Cheney's company, Halliburton.

The "outsourcing" of our voting system began just before the Iraq War with a $3.9 electronic voting boondoggle from the Anthrax Congress, which fast-tracked these PRIVATE voting systems all over the country during the 2002 to 2004 period, and it is closely related to that war, in my opinion. In Feb '03, nearly 60% of the American people opposed the invasion of Iraq which the Bush Junta proceeded to perpetrate despite majority opposition. That near 60% peace-minded majority had to be overruled in the 2004 (s)election, to keep the war going and in order to permanently ensconce the U.S. military in the Middle East. Our election system is extremely corrupt and desperately in need of reform in many ways, but this was the final blow to our democracy--the corporate takeover of the very counting of our votes, and BANNING the public from reviewing the code by which the votes are tabulated! The audit situation is even more shocking. In half the states in the U.S., there is NO audit AT ALL--no way to check for machine fraud--and the other half do only a miserably inadequate 1% audit. Thus, ONE far-rightwing connected corporation can determine the results of virtually any election in the country. I believe that this power was used in its rawest form to keep Bush-Cheney in power in 2004 and to put mindbogglingly stupid and corrupt people in power in Congress. It has been used more subtly since then--for instance, to saddle Obama with Puke/"Blue Dog" infested Congress and to shave Obama's mandate for reform. And it lurks in the background, as to our future, in the potential for yet more stolen elections--even including, for instance, the installation of Sarah Palin or re-installation of Dick Cheney in the White House. Don't laugh. ONE far rightwing corporation has the easy--EASY--power to do this and we would be helpless to prevent it.

The "outsourcing" of vote counting is, bar none, the worst manifestation of this corporate pestilence and possibly the worst thing that has happened to our country and our democracy in the modern era. It is the final blockade to critically needed reform. It may well be the final blow to our democracy itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC