Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

One Month Later: Five Things We Know About the BP Gulf Disaster

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 01:41 PM
Original message
One Month Later: Five Things We Know About the BP Gulf Disaster
http://www.commondreams.org/newswire/2010/05/20-15

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
May 20, 2010
2:32 PM


CONTACT: Public Citizen
Phone: 202-588-1000
One Month Later: Five Things We Know About the BP Gulf Disaster
Statement by Tyson Slocum, Director of Public Citizen’s Energy Program


WASHINGTON - May 20 - A month has passed since the explosion of the Deepwater Horizon rig in the Gulf of Mexico, and still, oil is gushing from a broken well at a rate that is still being debated but is likely far higher than BP, the company responsible for the disaster, originally estimated. Here's what we know so far:

1. We should have seen it coming. BP was under criminal probation at the time of the disaster for felony violation of U.S. environmental laws. The company has one of the worst track records of any oil company operating in America. It needs more than just a financial slap on the wrist, which is what it will get if the $75 million liability cap remains in place. Instead, BP should pay full damages to those who have lost their livelihoods in addition to playing for the cost of cleanup.

2. Mounting evidence shows that BP was negligent. Firsthand accounts describe BP managers proceeding with work to cap the well, even though they were informed that the integrity of the blowout preventer had been compromised. BP must be held accountable - and should be subject to permanent sanctions and criminal charges against executives.

3. BP is as transparent as oil about the disaster. BP has consistently misled the public about how much oil is gushing from the well, has forbidden scientists from more thoroughly analyzing the rate of the gusher and has blocked journalists from taking photos of oil-covered beaches. At the same time, BP is footing the bill for a $70 million television ad campaign to assure tourists that Gulf Coast beaches are safe.

4. The Minerals Management Service cannot be trusted to protect workers, the environment or taxpayers. We need a total overhaul of this dreadful agency - now.

5. We must ban all new leasing, permitting and drilling offshore until a full investigation is complete. It would be senseless to continue this practice for one more second until safety is analyzed and improvements are implemented.


BP must pay. We urge the public to pledge to boycott BP for at least three months by visiting www.BeyondBP.org.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. To the greatest with thee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. BOYCOTT! Great idea. ARCO is a BP company, can anyone confirm? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. One cannot really boycott a BRAND of oil.
I'm tickled every time Rachel says, "OUR OIL" as THAT is a joke. If she doesn't yet GET that I trust she'll be open to education. NORWAY does "OUR OIL." The U.S. ABSOLUTELY not. The oil drilling rights are LEASED to whomever and the produce goes on to the WORLD MARKET. Royalties are another thread. See: MMS for that royalties thingy.

Would some of you yung'uns who get what I'm trying to explain please jump in here and 'splain the MARKET to your peers? You'd do Tante K.'s heart and BP (double entendre? :rofl: ) a world of good. I be still kicking but mighty TIRED.

Thanx in advance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1955doubledie Donating Member (224 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
4. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
5. I don't think it needs just an overhaul
It needs actual regulatory powers that include independent organizations that stand between industry and the government to stand as experts for the government so we don't just have to rely on industry acting as its own experts. Other agencies have such entities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
6. The Minerals Management Service IS BEING OVERHAULED. And DU'ers trashed Obama for doing just that.
While the thread about it sank like a stone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
7. What needs to be done is a federal oil spill task force formed
Not some committee, but a REAL task force that operates similar to fire departments but is part of the United States Coast Guard and is supplemented by the Department of the NAvy.

The purpose of this group is rapid ready response to any oil spill and oil well leaks like this.

Their job would consist of training an preparation for an oil spill or well blowout like this one.

You pay for it by putting it on the dime of the oil companies.

And think about it, a federal force that does nothing but this would develop levels of expertise the oil companies could never develop in centuries of dealing with these things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
8. When is it 'negligence'....

and when is it sop to cut as many corners as possible in order to increase profitability?

That's capitalism for ya.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanonRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
9. 6. The U.S. Coast Guard is a BP subsidiary
7. BP is so greedy, it's even making a profit on the chemical dispersants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC