WeDidIt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-20-10 05:19 PM
Original message |
I have to admit, the debate between Rand Paul and Rachel Maddow was not fair. |
|
It's never fair when one participant in a battle of wits is unarmed and the other has the rhetorical equivalent of a nuclear bomb.
|
secondwind
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-20-10 05:20 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I WAS READY TO BATTLE YOU OVER THIS POST! LOL |
WeDidIt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-20-10 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
ladjf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-20-10 05:27 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Rachel always comes to the "shoot out" well armed with pertinent |
|
facts. That's a great way to win an argument against the uninformed.
|
eShirl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-20-10 05:31 PM
Response to Original message |
gleaner
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-20-10 05:32 PM
Response to Original message |
5. I should teach Rand Paul a valuable lesson .... |
|
Stay far away from truly intelligent people. They make him look like pond scum.:rofl:
|
aikoaiko
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-20-10 05:35 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Rand Paul was unarmed. At least he can eat at a restaurant. |
Cant trust em
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-20-10 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. He probably doesn't even need anyone to cut his meat for him. nt |
madrchsod
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-20-10 06:05 PM
Response to Original message |
8. let`s see---rachel-rhodes scholar..... |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 09th 2024, 02:05 PM
Response to Original message |