yellowcanine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-20-10 09:39 PM
Original message |
Anyone else think Rand Paul had the proverbial "deer in the headlights" look |
|
with Rachel and with Wolf Blitzer?
This guy is floundering almost as much as Sarah Palin did.
|
rurallib
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-20-10 09:41 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I thought it was more of a frat-boy smirk |
|
like 'I am better than you. Quit fucking bothering me with your idiot questions." kind of look.
|
FSogol
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-20-10 09:41 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I'm sure he is at home frantically leafing thru his copy of "Atlas Shrugged" for the answers. |
|
What a loon. Hope the complete ridicule of the libertarians continues.
|
notadmblnd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-20-10 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
6. yes, he does seem to have absorbed his namesakes philosophy |
|
She was wrong and he is wrong.
|
saltpoint
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-20-10 09:42 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Rand likely is at ease speaking in front of audiences who already |
|
agree with him on most things.
Against Rachel Maddow, he was definitely in over his head.
|
Catshrink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-20-10 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. Any of the RWers who think they can "handle" Rachel end up schooled |
saltpoint
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-20-10 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. They do. She does her homework and evidently they think they can |
|
just breeze thru the interview.
She's too fast for them mentally and way better prepared on the issues.
|
CTyankee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
11. I saw him whining about Rachel Maddow to George Stephanopoulos today on GMA. |
|
What a baby! That big, bad lesbian beat him up! She was SO MEAN to the poor little guy...
|
saltpoint
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
12. Yep. That Rachel is just too intelligent and informed and insightful. |
|
The sheer ruthlessness of that woman!
:hi:
|
CTyankee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. And openly gay! That must drive the righties right off the rails... |
saltpoint
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
14. They're probably so used to bullying people for just about any |
|
reason that they haven't quite processed her sexual orientation in with their objections to her politics, and Rachel can't be bullied because she's too smart, especially for Republicans!
Agree -- they're probably furious with her.
The Republicans never get to the part in the equation that it isn't Rachel Maddow's fault that Rand Paul is a racist throwback.
The Rand Paul interview was fair. She gave him more than one chance to walk back his position and clarify what he meant on the Civil Rights Act, and he flubbed it repeatedly.
|
opihimoimoi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-20-10 10:31 PM
Response to Original message |
7. This is their BEST???? OMG.....How Desperate can they get? |
livingonearth
(451 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-20-10 10:48 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Wow, talk about evading a question... |
|
Paul went everywhere trying to get away from that one.
|
HopeHoops
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 07:26 AM
Response to Original message |
9. I'd call it more of a "drunken dumbfuck in a bar" look. |
deutsey
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 07:45 AM
Response to Original message |
10. So did Bush early on n/t |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:57 PM
Response to Original message |