Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I don't know a lot about Rand Paul, so I checked his wiki entry.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 09:27 AM
Original message
I don't know a lot about Rand Paul, so I checked his wiki entry.
Edited on Fri May-21-10 09:31 AM by Heidi
Is something amiss here? Or am I just readin' this wrong?



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rand_Paul
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Goofball"?
You would THINK he could give it a nice racist stereotype sort of name to fit his views on the matter.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Gawd as my witness,
I had no idea roosters could talk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Who's talking about roosters?
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. Oh!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. The thing about Wiki is that "anybody" can make changes and put in anything they please.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. So do you suppose he doesn't even _have_ a rooster?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. I would not be surprised to hear he actually does not have a cock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #14
30. Not a black one.....
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. That's just a nickname for the cock
Edited on Fri May-21-10 09:48 AM by Ichingcarpenter
They named him Michael Steele on the official paper

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. Heh. But seriously, I want to know how a constitutional ban on abortion jibes with Libertarianism.
Let me get this straight, government does not have the right to tell business not to serve minorities, but does have the right to tell women what to do with their bodies?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demoiselle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. It doesn't.
What I'd like to know is, if Wikipedia had all this info on Randy (and who wouldn't be, with a 6.5 inch talking cock!) why didn't the Librul Media pick up any of it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmoney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
6. yeah, I'd heard it was named Felix
After the late Supreme Court justice Felix Frankfurter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. I believe a naming contest may be in order here.
:heh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
10. Bill O'Reilly has a vibrator.
I think we should respect Rand's privacy on this issue unless he starts making hurrasturbator calls to underlings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. I'll extend to his rooster the same degree of privacy he extends to my uterus.
Edited on Fri May-21-10 09:41 AM by Heidi
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #13
25. I think that's fair.
Randi said yesterday that the pukes are not trying to shrink government down to the size that it could be drowned in a bathtub. Rather, they are trying to shrink government down to the size that it can be implanted in her uterus. Gotta put a little cop in there. Of course the child once ejected from the government-protected uterus would be outside the uterus and therefore outside the protection of a perfect puke government. Praise God!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #25
35. GREAT one!!!
Where I come from, forcible entry into a woman's private parts is called rape. I guess that's what the anti-choicers are, deep down. RAPISTS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #13
26. Woot !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #13
36. Agreed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Soylent Brice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
12. BWAHAHAHAAAAAA!!!!
:spray:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
15. thanks,I needed that.Now when I see Paul,I'll see Goofball
:scared: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. You might even _hear_ Goofball.
After all, Goofball is a talking cock. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #17
27. I shudder at the thought of what Goofball would say...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
18. You crack me up, gf!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. The sad thing is that, just to be on the safe side
before I started this thread, I yelled to Call Me Wesley, "Can roosters talk? Or is there a problem here?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
20. It appears that wiki user "Teambender" is to thank for that gem.
Edited on Fri May-21-10 09:55 AM by Barack_America
But, just as I sadly suspected, it does not appear that Rand has a cock after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. I have seen absolutely no credible evidence
that Rand Paul has a cock. So I am assuming you are correct and that his wiki page has been vandalized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #21
31. I just hope that if he DOES have a black cock...
...that he discloses that information to business owners, giving them the opportunity to refuse it service.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. Like you, I would expect the arbiter of morality to be completely honest
about any variances in pigment which might influence his fellow bigots' assessment of the content of his character.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
22. I chuckled until I realized that really WAS on wiki-it's been edited-then I really laughed
Edited on Fri May-21-10 10:01 AM by w8liftinglady
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stargazer09 Donating Member (625 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #22
28. Thank you for the laugh! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Lane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #22
39. It was vandalism, added at 10:03 a.m. and reverted at 10:06 a.m.
As for the cached version you mentioned in your other post, it's not there only until Rand Paul's people get at it. As a general rule, all prior versions of all Wikipedia articles are permanently available for public view, so the reader can see what was added when and by whom. (If you see something strange like this, check the recent history. If the addition is new, it's more likely to be bogus.) In exceptional cases, an admin can remove an old version from the history. This is usually done only for serious issues like copyright violation.

BTW, if anyone has any ideas about substantive improvements to the article, go ahead and make them. If you need any help figuring out Wiki markup or Wikipedia's editing standards, feel free to PM me and I'll be glad to help you. If in doubt, though, follow the Wikipedia axiom of (That means that it's OK if you don't do everything perfectly. Someone else can fix it.)

We desperately need more progressives editing Wikipedia. Right-wingers are constantly deleting well-sourced information that contradicts their propaganda, as well as adding rubbish from World Nut Daily and the like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. I agree-we need to be more proactive...but it WAS funny...
...maybe because I live in a house of teenage boys
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkie Brewster Donating Member (301 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
23. Already fixed, damn it
This is hilarious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. see my post above..it IS cached-until Paul's people get at it,anyway
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lillypaddle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
29. This made my day!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #29
33. Mr. Paul and his lil buddy Goofball are happy to oblige,
I'm sure. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
distantearlywarning Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
34. Yes.
Nobody who calls themselves "Libertarian" should oppose same-sex marriage, and they ought to be thinking very carefully about their views on abortion. This guy isn't libertarian, he's just an asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. "This guy isn't a libertarian, he's just an asshole."
:thumbsup:

Best post in this thread.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
38. kicking for comic relief
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
41. This is all you need to know:
:D



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC