Heidi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 09:27 AM
Original message |
I don't know a lot about Rand Paul, so I checked his wiki entry. |
|
Edited on Fri May-21-10 09:31 AM by Heidi
Is something amiss here? Or am I just readin' this wrong? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rand_Paul
|
HopeHoops
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 09:30 AM
Response to Original message |
|
You would THINK he could give it a nice racist stereotype sort of name to fit his views on the matter.
|
Heidi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
I had no idea roosters could talk.
|
Barack_America
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. Who's talking about roosters? |
Heidi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
Winterblues
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. The thing about Wiki is that "anybody" can make changes and put in anything they please. |
Heidi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
14. So do you suppose he doesn't even _have_ a rooster? |
Barack_America
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
16. I would not be surprised to hear he actually does not have a cock. |
Winterblues
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
Ichingcarpenter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
7. That's just a nickname for the cock |
|
Edited on Fri May-21-10 09:48 AM by Ichingcarpenter
They named him Michael Steele on the official paper
|
Barack_America
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 09:33 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Heh. But seriously, I want to know how a constitutional ban on abortion jibes with Libertarianism. |
|
Let me get this straight, government does not have the right to tell business not to serve minorities, but does have the right to tell women what to do with their bodies?
|
Demoiselle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
What I'd like to know is, if Wikipedia had all this info on Randy (and who wouldn't be, with a 6.5 inch talking cock!) why didn't the Librul Media pick up any of it?
|
gmoney
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 09:37 AM
Response to Original message |
6. yeah, I'd heard it was named Felix |
|
After the late Supreme Court justice Felix Frankfurter
|
Heidi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
11. I believe a naming contest may be in order here. |
Gold Metal Flake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 09:40 AM
Response to Original message |
10. Bill O'Reilly has a vibrator. |
|
I think we should respect Rand's privacy on this issue unless he starts making hurrasturbator calls to underlings.
|
Heidi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
13. I'll extend to his rooster the same degree of privacy he extends to my uterus. |
|
Edited on Fri May-21-10 09:41 AM by Heidi
:)
|
Gold Metal Flake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
|
Randi said yesterday that the pukes are not trying to shrink government down to the size that it could be drowned in a bathtub. Rather, they are trying to shrink government down to the size that it can be implanted in her uterus. Gotta put a little cop in there. Of course the child once ejected from the government-protected uterus would be outside the uterus and therefore outside the protection of a perfect puke government. Praise God!
|
calimary
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
|
Where I come from, forcible entry into a woman's private parts is called rape. I guess that's what the anti-choicers are, deep down. RAPISTS.
|
dixiegrrrrl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
26. Woot !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
calimary
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
Soylent Brice
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 09:40 AM
Response to Original message |
w8liftinglady
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 09:43 AM
Response to Original message |
15. thanks,I needed that.Now when I see Paul,I'll see Goofball |
|
:scared: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
|
Heidi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #15 |
17. You might even _hear_ Goofball. |
|
After all, Goofball is a talking cock. :P
|
w8liftinglady
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #17 |
27. I shudder at the thought of what Goofball would say... |
maddezmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 09:49 AM
Response to Original message |
Heidi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #18 |
19. The sad thing is that, just to be on the safe side |
|
before I started this thread, I yelled to Call Me Wesley, "Can roosters talk? Or is there a problem here?"
|
Barack_America
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 09:54 AM
Response to Original message |
20. It appears that wiki user "Teambender" is to thank for that gem. |
|
Edited on Fri May-21-10 09:55 AM by Barack_America
But, just as I sadly suspected, it does not appear that Rand has a cock after all.
|
Heidi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #20 |
21. I have seen absolutely no credible evidence |
|
that Rand Paul has a cock. So I am assuming you are correct and that his wiki page has been vandalized.
|
Barack_America
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #21 |
31. I just hope that if he DOES have a black cock... |
|
...that he discloses that information to business owners, giving them the opportunity to refuse it service.
|
Heidi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #31 |
32. Like you, I would expect the arbiter of morality to be completely honest |
|
about any variances in pigment which might influence his fellow bigots' assessment of the content of his character.
|
w8liftinglady
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 09:59 AM
Response to Original message |
22. I chuckled until I realized that really WAS on wiki-it's been edited-then I really laughed |
|
Edited on Fri May-21-10 10:01 AM by w8liftinglady
|
Stargazer09
(625 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #22 |
28. Thank you for the laugh! n/t |
Jim Lane
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
39. It was vandalism, added at 10:03 a.m. and reverted at 10:06 a.m. |
|
As for the cached version you mentioned in your other post, it's not there only until Rand Paul's people get at it. As a general rule, all prior versions of all Wikipedia articles are permanently available for public view, so the reader can see what was added when and by whom. (If you see something strange like this, check the recent history. If the addition is new, it's more likely to be bogus.) In exceptional cases, an admin can remove an old version from the history. This is usually done only for serious issues like copyright violation.
BTW, if anyone has any ideas about substantive improvements to the article, go ahead and make them. If you need any help figuring out Wiki markup or Wikipedia's editing standards, feel free to PM me and I'll be glad to help you. If in doubt, though, follow the Wikipedia axiom of (That means that it's OK if you don't do everything perfectly. Someone else can fix it.)
We desperately need more progressives editing Wikipedia. Right-wingers are constantly deleting well-sourced information that contradicts their propaganda, as well as adding rubbish from World Nut Daily and the like.
|
w8liftinglady
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #39 |
40. I agree-we need to be more proactive...but it WAS funny... |
|
...maybe because I live in a house of teenage boys
|
Junkie Brewster
(301 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 10:01 AM
Response to Original message |
23. Already fixed, damn it |
w8liftinglady
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #23 |
24. see my post above..it IS cached-until Paul's people get at it,anyway |
lillypaddle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 10:36 AM
Response to Original message |
Heidi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #29 |
33. Mr. Paul and his lil buddy Goofball are happy to oblige, |
distantearlywarning
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 12:17 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Nobody who calls themselves "Libertarian" should oppose same-sex marriage, and they ought to be thinking very carefully about their views on abortion. This guy isn't libertarian, he's just an asshole.
|
Heidi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #34 |
37. "This guy isn't a libertarian, he's just an asshole." |
|
:thumbsup:
Best post in this thread.
:kick:
|
w8liftinglady
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 03:24 PM
Response to Original message |
38. kicking for comic relief |
Swamp Rat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 09:45 PM
Response to Original message |
41. This is all you need to know: |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:23 PM
Response to Original message |