greencharlie
(827 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 11:18 AM
Original message |
the Legacy of the GUSHER... new fast response agency? |
|
Like it or not... offshore drilling isn't going anywhere. No one has the political willpower to stop it. Period.
But at the very least... in the future all oil co's should be taxed to fund a US gov't agency that exists PURELY as a rapid response force for Deep Sea related disasters. They need their own crews, their own engineers and equipment.
|
jdlh8894
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 11:39 AM
Response to Original message |
|
They are in International Waters.BP is a UK company. We gave them the permits. Just for giggles,why isn't it called the Gulf of USA?
|
DURHAM D
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. They are in the U.S. Economic Zone. 200 miles. |
|
So we can do what the OP suggests.
|
jdlh8894
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. Agree that they are in the zone |
|
But how do we put a tax on something that has not been produced yet.
|
DURHAM D
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. Many states have a "well-head" tax. |
|
Its really not difficult. Easy to count and qualify.
Perhaps you just don't want to do it...
|
jdlh8894
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. I was under the impression |
|
This well had not been capped. They were trying to, when it blew.
|
DURHAM D
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. Not sure what point you are trying to make. |
|
All existing wells should be taxed.
|
jdlh8894
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
|
It was a drilling site that they were trying to cap when the explosion happened.
|
DURHAM D
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
What about this don't you understand.
"Tax all existing wells". Operative word - existing.
|
jdlh8894
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. The well was not producing. |
|
They were capping it and then move the rig away so that a platform could be moved in to get whatever oil/gas could be obtained.
|
DURHAM D
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
jdlh8894
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. So? How do you tax something that hasn't been produced yet?n/t |
DURHAM D
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
jdlh8894
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
15. Old enough to know a few things.n/t |
FBI_Un_Sub
(610 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 12:31 PM
Response to Original message |
|
have some of the skill set, some of the people, and some of the hardware --- but not enough (they are low budget operations)
|
Poll_Blind
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-21-10 12:34 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Please don't take this as snarky because I really don't mean... |
|
...it that way, but having a rapid response agency for deep-sea disasters is not too far off from having a rapid response agency for space disasters or moon disasters- these are the definition of extreme environments. I'm not really sure what could be done more quickly with an agency of that nature than what is already being done. And when I say that I mean at the deep-sea level.
PB
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:00 AM
Response to Original message |