Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Stolen Birthright: The U.S. Conquest and Exploitation of the Mexican People

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 03:45 PM
Original message
Stolen Birthright: The U.S. Conquest and Exploitation of the Mexican People
http://www.houstonculture.org/hispanic/conquest5.html

Part II: Exploitation


Mexico never had a chance to recover from the war of 1846-1848. The brutal military conquest not only denied the people of Mexico their birthright in the Southwest, but it impacted the population and damaged the infrastructure of the surviving southern portion of the republic. In addition to the actual injury of the war, during the century and a half since the conquest the U.S. has used its position of power to subordinate Mexico to its own predatory interests, systematically plundering the resources of its southern neighbor, utilizing it as a private market for U.S. products and investment capital, and relentlessly exploiting the labor of the Mexican people. The exploitation of Mexican workers as a reserve army of labor for U.S. capitalism has been especially onerous. The labor repression and exploitation that was initiated soon after the military conquest of 1848 continues to this very day. snip

American capitalism has used Mexican workers as a reserve army of labor since the conquest. The proximity of the Mexican labor pool to points of production ensures a plentiful supply of workers during boom times and facilitates repatriation during economic downturns. The international border is no barrier to this exploitation -- U.S. capitalism targets Mexican workers in both countries. As migrants working in the U.S., or as employees of American firms in Mexico, Mexican workers have been excluded from minimum wage requirements, health care benefits, workman's compensation insurance, and social security plans. Moreover, government health and safety regulations have failed to protect them, while the education and social services that they and their families have received in both Mexico and the U.S. have been minimal. Because of these inferior wages and working conditions, Mexican labor has been a source of enormous superprofits (profits obtained over and above those squeezed out of native workers) for American capitalism.

The American bourgeoisie has jealously guarded these superprofits. At the end of the nineteenth century, U.S. companies regularly enlisted the aid of hired thugs, local law enforcement officials, and state agencies like the Texas and Arizona Rangers to protect their superprofits through the overt suppression of Mexican labor. Since the early 20th century, American capitalists have relied on the federal government to regulate the reserve army of Mexican labor. The U.S Border Patrol was founded in 1924 to control immigrant labor and continues to act as a gatekeeper for U.S. capitalism, opening and closing the border to Mexican workers as the needs of the U.S. economy dictate. Immigration law and government policy have alternatively encouraged Mexican workers to immigrate or subjected them to mass repression and deportation to meet the needs of U.S. capitalism. Furthermore, in order to insure a cheap supply of Mexican labor, the U.S. government has periodically intervened in the domestic politics of Mexico. snip

Large-scale exploitation of Mexican labor began with the U.S. annexation of northern Mexico. Between 1850 and 1880, more than 55,000 Mexican workers migrated to the U.S. to become field hands in regions that had originally been Mexican territory. Significant numbers of Mexican workers were also employed in the U.S. mining and railroad industries. As much as 60 percent of the miners and railway crews in the American West and Southwest during this period were Mexicans. From the very beginning, both the wages and working conditions of Mexican workers in the U.S. were well below those of white workers.

Anglo settlers and capitalists flooded into the annexed territory, and by 1860, just six years after the Gadsden Purchase, the new economic order of the American Southwest was already established with Mexican workers and their families at the bottom. Although both the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo and the Gadsden Purchase guaranteed pre-war property rights, most Mexican landowners lost their land and either repatriated or sank into the ranks of the Mexican working class of the Southwest. Like their landless immigrant compatriots, they had to earn their living as wage laborers -- carpenters, blacksmiths, freighters, servants, field hands, and miners -- and always and everywhere at wages less than those paid to white workers.

Mexican workers proved to be essential to the expansion of cattle ranching and agricultural production from California to Texas. Indeed, Mexican labor fueled the southwestern agricultural revolution that took place between 1900 and 1920 and contributed to America's overall development. However, it was World War I that boosted the demand for Mexican labor in the U.S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Whenever I see this kind of argument, I always think "What about the native population...
...that was there before Europeans came in and mixed things up to create what we know as Mexico?"

It's kind of a slippery slope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Looking back at our past is never a slippery slope
Not doing so is.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Knowing history is never a slippery slope. It is ignorance
of history that causes problems. Your comment is without much substance. Empires throughout history have decimated native populations and when they find themselves dealing with some of the consequences, they tend to whine about it, a lot.

How many Americans do you think have any idea of the history of Mexico/U.S. relations and how many would have a different view of immigration from that country if they did?

Seems to me we owe the people of Mexico something as we are benefiting from their loss. At least maybe we could stop the exploitation of their workers by making it a law that any U.S. company operating in a foreign country, must pay a livable wage to the native people who work for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SargeUNN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. the unrec patrol is out I see
This thread is unfortunately a history of how we have exploited Mexico but as usual some who can't believe any bad things our country has done or does have to come and unrec the thread but post no objections. That is because they are too cowardly to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Yes, I rec'd the OP also for the history lesson but apparently
some Americans feel better not knowing anything that might interfere with their xenophobia, their sense of rightesusness about being able to take what they want without having to feel any guilt about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teka Donating Member (140 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Unrecced by me
This is not a history lesson - it is slanted propaganda that ignores REALITY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Desertrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Recc'd...and what is the reality, pray tell?
"slanted propaganda"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. If you want to know who conquered and exploited Mexico, you
need to look at Spain.

The Spanish took Southern California, for example, from the Indians long before the U.S. stepped in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Yes, and Mexico had gained its independence from Spain
twenty years before the U.S. Mexican war. So I'm not sure what the actions of Spain, or any of the European conquerors had to do with the actions of the U.S.

This country was founded by people who warned against foreign wars, mainly because they saw the results of conquering Empires both on their victims and eventually on themselves.

I'm sure there will be those who will justify our invasion and theft of resources in Iraq eg in the future. Or our support for the world's worst dictators.

We are emulating those old conquering nations like Spain, France, Portugal, England which gave centuries of misery to untold numbers of people. The U.S. was supposed to change all that, not emulate it.

The 'manifest destiny' theory which many historians believe drove the U.S. war with Mexico, among other things, basically changed the original intention of the founders regarding this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. I live in California. I don't think that Europeans are in the majority here.
Personally, I live in a mostly immigrant community, and I like the diversity. I think the immigrants like it here too.

Many of the people of Mexican descent have been in this state longer than I have. I came rather recently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teka Donating Member (140 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. Bull Crap
Don't blame the dictators, the Catholic Church, or the greedy ogliarchy.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. The oligarchy couldn't control Mexico
without the direct help of the American government. Ditto for Cental and South America.

What just happened in Honduras is a textbook example. Enjoy your new Honduran neighbors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. What you mean is 'don't dare to blame the U.S.
for anything, we are the 'good guys'. Just because other nations have commit atrocities against some of our victims, doesn't diminish what we do. And the dictators in South America, the ME and Mexico would never have survived without the backing of the U.S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Desertrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
11. Thanks for this post, Don.
Fascinating....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
13. American capitalism has used Mexican, Chinese, Irish, Black, etc. workers as a reserve army of labor
Your experience is not unique.

And history sucks. It's all about killing people for control of things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC