Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Timeline of the Obama Administration's Response to Gulf Disaster.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 07:24 PM
Original message
Timeline of the Obama Administration's Response to Gulf Disaster.
I'm posting this link without comment, in hopes people will visit the page:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/05/05/ongoing-administration-wide-response-deepwater-bp-oil-spill

Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. You seem to care more about Obama's image than our funeral


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. its just public information nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. The post is made without comment.
You may look at the link or not, as you please. Seemed interesting enough to me, and has information in it. You can judge the quality of that information for yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Funny, how you noted that it is without comment , yet ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. OK
I already have.

To say the least, I am not happy with the federal government's response so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. This Post Attacking The OP Seems To Care More About A Blame The Feds Narrative Than Facts
Edited on Sun May-23-10 07:43 PM by TomCADem
I am not sure why you feel the need to attack the motives of the poster, particularly since the link is to a timeline that helps dispel rumors that the Obama adminstration is sitting around doing nothing. The facts show that this is not the case. Now, you can criticize the actions taken, or argue that different solutions should be explored, but arguing that nothing is being done tends to reflect an agenda, rather than honest discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. doesn't matter what has been done
it matters that it has not been effective
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marylanddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Way to go, Swamp Rat - perfect logo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. great logo!
thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. +1
Glad to see you're still here, Swamp Rat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Way'at readmoreoften!
:hi: I've been a bit 'testy' lately, to say the least, but I'm hangin' on with both claws. :D



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'll bookmark that
At least there's some place to follow things, though I added my thoughts on the overall response to your other thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cetacea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. Thanks.
Surface dispersant used: approximately 600,000 gallons
Subsea dispersant used: approximately 70,000
Total dispersant used: approximately 670,000

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. We're talking highly toxic, mutagenic, carcinogenic dispersant here.

Heck of a job... :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. Thanks for the post
Don't have time to read it now
But, I will save for later
Thanks much
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
btrflykng9 Donating Member (19 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. I don't think it's a question of the poster's motives but more a matter of ...
Edited on Sun May-23-10 08:16 PM by btrflykng9
I don't think it's a question of the poster's motives but more a matter of the source in which the information is taken: the BP oil spill was not handled in the manner in which it needed to be and the President certainly isn't going to call himself out on it on a webpage which maintains his interests and image.

An oil spill of this size is most certainly a result of some level of incompetence (to whatever degree you wish to assign it), nothing of that scale should be ventured into without means of handling the fallout should it go wrong, and clearly that was not done.

That's stating the obvious, I know, but just my opinion on the source in which the information was taken and its due validity or weight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
15. Reminds me why I had so much trouble voting for him in the first place.
He managed to get all the right agencies and beauracrats doing all that beauracrats do well, and he's got a lot of people thinking and watching and talking and analyzing.

What he hasn't done is been the kind of leader we needed, who would learn the situation, take charge, and make sure the right things were done. BP did what corporations are designed to do--it tried to fix the situation with as little expense to itself as possible. It tried the easiest fix, then the next easiest, played around with each when they failed to try to salvage their investment. There was no leader demanding they go straight for the most likely fix without concern for money. There was no leader to learn the situation and take over direction of the various agencies to make them work together most efficiently.

Obama had never been an executive in his life. Always a legislator, always a negotiator, always a lawyer. Always a concensus builder. Nothing in his history suggested he was ready to handle a situation like this. And now we see that he can't.

He responded more quickly and thoroughly than Bush did to Katrina, or anything else. He has a lot of people developing ideas and responses to the spill, to the environmental impact, and all of that. He's got a lot of action in action, and that's a good thing. In the long run we'll have a more aggressive response than if someone like Bush had been in charge, or someone like McCain. Bush would have just played air guitar while America burned. McCain would have tried to make his corporate sponsors happy by covering for them, swallowing costs with American dollars, trying to privatize the whole thing to funnel more money to his buddies, and ultimately he would just ignore the situation and claim there was no real emergency anyway.

Obama is better than either of those responses, but he hasn't been good enough. According to the timeline he got a lot of briefings, talked to a lot of people, and stood back while they all did their things. We needed more than that. We needed it a long time ago. Meanwhile, my Coast, my childhood home, the place I love most in the world, is being destroyed for the second time this decade, and the government response hasn't been adequate.

Sometimes when a patient in an Emergency Room has no chance, the doctors and nurses will go through the motions of trying to save and revive them, but not really do anything, because they don't think the patient can be saved. They know if they dance around long enough, nature will solve the problem for them, and no one can blame them for inaction. I wonder if that's happening here. Sooner or later the oil will stop spewing, or the Gulf will be so polluted it won't even matter. Obama and BP can say "We did everything we could. What would you have done differently?" and they can post the timelines to show a lot of activity. But I can't help but fear that they, or at least BP, is just going through the motions hoping things take care of themselves, and preparing a somber speech for the family.

And once again I'm sitting here wondering if I should apologize for Obama some more, or say what I really think about him, and I'm trying to remember if I've ever been this conflicted this early in any politician's term. Fuck it, let's go bowling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
16. Thanks for posting the link.
It's good to know what's being done, even though nothing has stopped the blowout yet. I think this is updated daily, maybe more times during the day. Nobody is standing around twiddling their fingers, that's for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
17. Thanks.
K & R :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC