Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

POLL: ALL Deep-water Drilling Should be Halted Immediately, since we have NO CLUE on how to deal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ShamelessHussy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 11:45 PM
Original message
POLL: ALL Deep-water Drilling Should be Halted Immediately, since we have NO CLUE on how to deal
Edited on Mon May-24-10 12:25 AM by ShamelessHussy
with a disaster when it happens?

There are over 3 thousand wells in operation in the Gulf alone today. Shouldn't EVERY one be shut down IMMEDIATELY until someone from the industry PROVES they have the expertise to effectively deal with a disaster.

Wouldn't that light a fire under the so called 'experts' in the industry, and motivate them to move more rapidly in this current ongoing historical disaster?!



the first EXECUTIVE Order tomorrow should be...

Exon, Shell, and all the rest... CEASE and DESIST all ongoing, deep sea drilling operations, ASAP. Your presence is REQUIRED in the Gulf IMMEDIATELY!


Simple yes or no in the subject line is fine.

Thank you DU :hug:

On Edit: Please K&R if you agree, to make it simple to count, and to spite the unrec trolls who are all over me on this topic ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. YES!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JaneFordA Donating Member (91 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
71. YES!
and again... YES!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katandmoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. YES from me, too. No one has a clue how to fix this. YES! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeanpalmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yes
Definitely no more offshore drilling until they can prove that it won't happen again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yes
Emphatic YES!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yes.
Provided the resultant stoppage doesn't increase risks that may compromise the safety of the well. (increased pressure buildup causing another leak)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. Many good men and women working to stop the corruption.
Edited on Mon May-24-10 12:11 AM by RandomThoughts
Interesting thought to plug the corruption is by exposing it.

Maybe fixing the world problems in many sectors would be a good start.


Exposing the good stuff is great also.

Allentown
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BHnJp0oyOxs


Have a little courage, I believe it will get better, after all, we are only Human.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YhxjNYvJbgM


Innocent Man
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=exSD7rHVI4U




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
8. absolutely
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
9. knr. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
10. Yes.
Offshore drilling was a bad idea from the beginning. To continue it after this is completely indefensible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
11. Yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jokinomx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
12. yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raouldukelives Donating Member (945 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
13. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
14. yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iwillnevergiveup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
15. YES! Offshore oil drilling should cease immediately
and entirely and permanently.

K&R

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #15
111. Since there are almost 4000 platforms in the Gulf, I say for now that no new
oil wells be dug.It would be a massive undertaking and huge lose of oil to do this so abruptly. I would suggest that they should be plugged by say 100 every six months,maybe by which ones determined by respected experts to be the least safe.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x6848894

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x8385057
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
16. Of course. But what we think will have no effect at all on drilling for oil.
Though in the coming years, when the oil continues to make America's coastlines an massive toxic zone, something will be forced to change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShamelessHussy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Wrong Answer - What the people think can change EVERYTHING, and ALWAYS has - FYI
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #17
24. When things arise to a certain level the whole thing tips over, THEN it will make a difference.
And this may get to that level but it's not there yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #16
48. Agreed! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
18. YES
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
19. Yes. That would do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
20. Yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
21. Absoutely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
22. Yes. I agree. K& R. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
23. Yes, absolutely! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tango-tee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 02:36 AM
Response to Original message
25. YES!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 05:08 AM
Response to Original message
26. ALL off shore drilling should shut down.
Edited on Mon May-24-10 05:08 AM by bowens43
not just deep water...all off shore drilling should be stopped immediately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShamelessHussy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 07:15 AM
Response to Reply #26
30. good point
since they would have to mount an effective containment and clean up effort no matter how deep the water is, and it looks like no one in the industry knows how to do that right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 05:13 AM
Response to Original message
27. Yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 06:39 AM
Response to Original message
28. yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
byrok Donating Member (132 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 06:49 AM
Response to Original message
29. Yes K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
31. Yes
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
32. Yes!!!
A thousand times!!!

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
33. K and fucking R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
34. YES!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cilla4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
35. Yes, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
36. No
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #36
81. Gosh, how did I guess?
I'm that good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #81
97. LOL !!!
:rofl:

I'm sure he's used to it...

:evilgrin:

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #97
99. He's probably completely surprised.
Some people are THAT clueless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
37. K&R ! //nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
38. yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
39. YES
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
40. i do agree
clearly it's not worth it to continue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
41. Natioalize the energy sector.
k&r

Expropriate without compensation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
42. YES!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
43. yes, stop it now!
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
44. Does this logic also apply to nuclear power?
YES. :hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FailureToCommunicate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
45. Yes. The risks, and the current degraded Gulf, are not worth the measly 2% that comes
from offshore drilling!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
46. Yes, I agree with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemperEadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
47. Yes. There is no other logical answer but yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
icee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
49. Yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swilton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
50. ABSOLUTELY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
51. YES
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flor-de-jasmim Donating Member (260 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
52. YES, absolutely!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoSheep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
53. yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bryn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
54. YES!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
55. Yes n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laurab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
56. Yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pauldp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
57. Yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proReality Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
58. Yes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
59. K&R: Yes. . . and no one should say "no" to this until we know full consequences of
Edited on Mon May-24-10 01:26 PM by defendandprotect
this spill and total impact on Nature --

Capitalism is based on exploitation of nature -- we need to move on.

If you want democracy, you need to employ economic democracy --

capitalism isn't it!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoccoR5955 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
60. ABSOFRIGGINLUTELY!!!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DireStrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
61. yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tosh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
62. Yes. K&R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
63. This is a good idea.
But it will never happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
64. Only if you can prove that the damages from cutting off the oil supply will be less. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShamelessHussy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #64
67. what percent of the gulf oil goes to america?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #67
68. We only care about America? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShamelessHussy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #68
70. This is a GLOBAL disaster with huge consequences for everyone. I don't think we should risk another
until we know how to deal with them at the very least.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #70
103. There is no risk involved in cutting oil production? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShamelessHussy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #103
108. well if that is the case, then it is definitely time to stop all drilling
and they are still required to send an armada and army to the gulf for clean up and containment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #108
114. I was asking a question - do you think there is no risk involved in reducing the oil supply...
...by however much is being brought in from offshore? Do you honestly believe that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShamelessHussy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #114
117. well, if they are drilling, it is not part of the supply
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #117
148. You said that we should shut down all the wells, not just stop drilling.
There are over 3 thousand wells in operation in the Gulf alone today. Shouldn't EVERY one be shut down IMMEDIATELY until someone from the industry PROVES they have the expertise to effectively deal with a disaster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #148
152. Tell you what, LoZo, I'll ask you the same question when Florida is one giant oil slick...
...and this putrid petroleum mess finds it's way into the Gulf Steam and up the East Coast.

If the technology is NOT available to prevent and/or clean up disasters of this magnitude, than I certainly would want to examine every offshore well and their permits.

It's kind of like the premise that a country that doesn't take care of their wounded veterans, has no business making any more.

And it is a valid question where is the Gulf oil going? Is it coming into the United States? When the US government licenses and issues permits for drilling offshore of the United States, the citizens of this country should be compensated. Not a foreign oil company.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShamelessHussy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #148
153. they should stop all drilling, and ensure all wells have at least one relief well before pumping
and all existing wells should also be forced to install relief wells as well.

AND the whole industry should be required to respond to the containment and cleanup.

how's that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Control-Z Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
65. Absolutely!
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hun Joro Donating Member (511 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
66. Yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
69. YES! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissDeeds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
72. Yes!!!!
K&R :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1Hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
73. yes, yes, a thousand times YES!!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
74. Hell YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
75. yes. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eyerish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
76. Yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
77. YES
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kermitt Gribble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
78. YES! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleanime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
79. Oh, hell yea...
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
racaulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
80. Yes ma'am!!!
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onpatrol98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
82. Yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
83. common sense! rec'd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
84. common sense! rec'd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spheric Donating Member (512 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
85. Yes for sanity. K&R /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Urban Prairie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
86. Ye$ $hut them down NOW!!!
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
87. ABSOLUTELY!
Why the hell would this thread be unrec'd. Nevermind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
green917 Donating Member (124 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
88. Emphatically YES!!!!!
I don't understand that we have laws on the books to "protect" citizens because "we don't know" what the long term effects of certain activities (i.e. smoking marijuana) will be but we don't have a similar law on the books to protect the oil companies (& us) from the fact that
we don't know what the long-term effects of deep water drilling of the depths that Deep water Horizon was drilling at (although we're starting to learn the hard way) will be.

ALL deep water drilling should be immediately halted until this issue in the Gulf is resolved and cleaned up (at the expense of BP). At that point, a major study should be undertaken and legislation written that requires non-industry testing of all safety procedures on rigs of this type. No more taking their word for things being "safe"! If it's deemed to not be safe, it doesn't get approved!

The truly egregious part of all of this is that as much as 90% of the oil that comes out of Gulf coast rigs, doesn't come to the American market...it goes to Asia or Europe. The U.S. "war" effort in Iraq currently requires thousands of gallons of gasoline a week. If we were to end the illegal occupation of Iraq and our misguided operations in Afghanistan, it would cut our consumption considerably (it would be a start anyways). I'm of course day dreaming as none of these seemingly simple solutions will happen because our government is nothing but a collection of whores for big oil and other big business!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hulka38 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
89. Yes
Edited on Mon May-24-10 04:44 PM by hulka38
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kumbricia Donating Member (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
90. Yeah
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lugnut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
91. Absolutely! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1monster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
92. Yes. Emphatically!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theFrankFactor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
93. Yes and Nationalize the Energy Sector
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pooka Fey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
94. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chulanowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
95. Makes absolute sense to me
Unfortunately, BP's already shown that it will happily ignore direct orders from the US government.

If they were North Korea, we'd bomb them for that shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
96. Yes !!! - K & R !!!
:yourock:

:kick:

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberalynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
98. YES
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stlsaxman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
100. Yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
101. Hell fucking YES.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
102. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ShamelessHussy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #102
107. the gulf is dying, and will put even more out of work
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #107
115. Hyperbole. There is no evidence that the gulf is "dying"
:argh:

It's a big mess, but an oil mess that size in the Gulf of Mexico is not unprecedented.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ixtoc_I

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShamelessHussy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #115
120. oxygen had already dropped 30 percent near some of the plumes in the month
Giant Plumes of Oil Forming Under the Gulf
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/16/us/16oil.html


BTW: there were already massive dead zones in the gulf before this catastrophe, so this is just gonna make it even worse.

so this isn't 'hyperbole' and there is 'evidence'.

i think your rage is misdirected at the messenger instead of the real perps, the cozy relationship between big oil and gov.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #120
157. Of course there is damage. People have been damaging the Gulf's ecosystems for centuries.
Compared to the cumulative damage from all the fertilizers and pesticides that have been dumped down the Mississippi and other rivers, and all the other oil spills that have happened, and the effects of sewage spills and urban street runoff, and oil leaking from ships and boats, and all the plastic trash that ends up in the water, I think the impact of this spill, while spectacular and acute right now, is going to be just another in a long series of insults.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShamelessHussy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #157
161. of course you do, but excuse me if I prefer to take action
good night
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #115
137. So you love yourself some BP. There is no evidence that the gulf isnt dying either
How dare you suggest that this isnt a disaster. Maybe the complete gulf isnt dying, but you get the fucking message. Or do you? This is a disaster that could have been prevented but wasnt because of greed. Fucking corporate greed. Now the taxpayers will have to pay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #137
154. I have never suggested that it isn't a disaster
This kind of discussion is pointless without a concise definition of terms like "dying".

Of course it's a mess. Of course there will be long-term damage.

People need their jobs. Stopping a huge number of productive oil wells would add to an already bad unemployment problem. Stop the wells, and you have to shut down refineries. More people out of work. More expensive fuel and other products, leading to higher prices for everything including food.

The idea is completely unrealistic. It's sad and silly at the same time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #154
166. I disagree. Until the oil companies can assure us that their methods are in fact safe,
they should be immediately shut down. The resulting unemployment is a tiny drop in the bucket to the huge cost of another spill disaster.

I find it an interesting argument when it looks like it might be necessary to punish a corporation, people defend the corporation by arguing that it would effect the workers. That is essentially blackmail.

And there is more oil available in capped wells in the US than all the reserves off-shore. Tell the oil companies to open some of those wells. What are they saving it for? But you know that gas prices are totally unrelated to the price of crude. Oil prices are totally determined by the oil companies. With profit margins like Exxon has, they have unlimited flexibility with adjusting the price of oil. There is no competition at the pump.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jakes Progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
104. Yep. This will happen again no mater what they do.
We lack the science and technology to do this kind of thing safely -- let alone the will to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
105. YES
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plucketeer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
106. Without a doubt!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandyd921 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
109. K & R! Absolutely! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chisox08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
110. Yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat2000 Donating Member (22 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
112. Yesss
x1000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demigoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
113. they should be ashamed of themselves!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
116. HELL yes
As someone else posted, ALL licences for offshore rigs should be pulled until there's a CONCRETE method of dealing with undersea gushers.

WITH several proven alternatives that DON'T involve nuclear devices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mynameiswhat Donating Member (95 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
118. No?
what if it causes gas prices to go up? I don't wanna pay $4 a gallon again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShamelessHussy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #118
121. sure, some will sacrifice everything for cheap gas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mynameiswhat Donating Member (95 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #121
122. I'm not saying sacrifice everything
I'm just saying that, ya there was a HUGE accident that took place and it is fucking the gulf coast up. but just because accidents happen we should stop everything because of it? Its not like this kinda shit happens every day or every year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShamelessHussy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #122
126. just the gulf, i understand
:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neverforget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #126
131. But it's just a flesh wound!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShamelessHussy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #131
132. yes, always look on the bright side of life


love those guys :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Devil_Fish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #122
158. Thats right, it's a shame that this spill could posibly inconvienence your Hummer at the pump.
Can't have that now can we. How short sighted can you be? Just because this didn't hapen in your back yard...

:wtf: :argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #158
167. I voted "no" and I have not owned a car in over ten years. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShamelessHussy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #167
168. looks like you are in the minority... most folks want the drilling to stop until safe guards are in
i would stipulate the we also need a much better response plan in place, too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #118
123. They can't keep threatening us with high prices forever
Sooner or later their own profit margins, huge tax breaks and political influence are going to come into question. Then it's time to give their organizations an ACORN-like probe.

We'll see how long their stranglehold over energy production and price fixing REALLY lasts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mynameiswhat Donating Member (95 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #123
125. how high is too much for you?
would you pay $8 a gallon to stop it all?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #125
128. I already pay $4 a gallon
But I refuse to give in to corporate interests threatening higher prices when we KNOW that they could maintain LOWER prices IF they gave up their executive salaries and wasteful ways.

Not to mention that their industry is already SUBSIDIZED by your and our governments to the tune of BILLIONS every year.

Sure, let them raise prices. Pretty soon, people will start asking, "Hey, why is gas THIS much money all of a sudden?

That would be their WORST nightmare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mynameiswhat Donating Member (95 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #128
129. Yes they pay their execs too much money.
And they love their money. I'm not willing to shut them down and pay a higher gas price. If there were oil disasters happening every year then that would be one thing. But it doesn't happen that often. BP should pay out the ass for this but they should be able to stay in business if they can continue to make a profit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kalun D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
119. YES
YES

Kick and Rec
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Digit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
124. Yes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paper Roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
127. Yes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
130. I agree.
What you said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deuce Donating Member (38 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
133. YES!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edgineered Donating Member (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
134. yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
135. yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
136. yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimlup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
138. YES
And that is not a trivial knee jerk reaction
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
139. rec and yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
140. YES!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluzmann57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
141. Yes
Hell yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orbitalman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
142. ABSOLUTELY. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old Codger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
143. absolutely YES
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NodQuestion Donating Member (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
144. Meh
not really an extremist myself, but I like where your heads at.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
145. K&R
To allow any deep-sea operations to continue is beyond irresponsible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eyeofdelphi Donating Member (110 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
146. Yes!!!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
relayerbob Donating Member (149 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
147. Yes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VenusRising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
149. 1000x YES!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
150. YES!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Devil_Fish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
151. Yes! K&R N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
155. YES Full ban. They've proved they cannot contain or stop a blowout
I don't understand the debate. Game over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
156. If I had spilt mercury into my neighbor's backyard...
would I not be held accountable? They should be too. Each and every one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varelse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
159. Yes (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
160. Yes, right now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boudica the Lyoness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
162. Yes
Yes yes yes yes yes yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
163. Yes. And shut of the drilling until every damn one is determined to be safe, but then who's going to
make that determination?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tumbulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
164. Yes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tumbulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
165. Yes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC