Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A solution for the Gulf Problem

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Aleric Donating Member (278 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 11:49 AM
Original message
A solution for the Gulf Problem
Edited on Mon May-24-10 11:56 AM by Aleric
I've been hearing people suggest that government needs to step in and fix the well. I don't believe the government has the right expertise for that but here is how the government could solve the problem;

1) Sieze the well in an act of eminent domain or whatever legal device will do the trick.

2) Invite all other parties to attempt to plug the well. The one who comes up with a working solution (i.e. the one who actually plugs the well) first gets ownership to the well.

3) Facilitate the process to ensure that best ideas go first, competing attempts don't interfere with each other and to prevent attempts that will make it worse.

I am sick of hearing "The next attempt will be in X days."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
time_has_come Donating Member (872 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. Interesting suggestions...but how can we know a solution is a "working solution" until it's tried?
And succeeded?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aleric Donating Member (278 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. A working solution
Edited on Mon May-24-10 11:58 AM by Aleric
You don't. A "Working solution" is one that works. i.e. The one who actually plugs the well, wins. ( I edited the OP for clarity).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
time_has_come Donating Member (872 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Ok, thanks. Hate to play devils advocate with you....but...
...how is it decided who gets to try first?

and are you saying that ownership of the well means that company/agency would then get to pump oil from it in future? If we offer that plum, then won't it discourage a permanent working solution in favour of one that allows them to gain access to the well pipe down the road?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aleric Donating Member (278 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. play away...
A *small* committee of experts would have to be designated to evaluate and guess at most likely solutions based on the integrity of the idea, the risk and the readiness of the proponent to actually execute the plan. (Small to allow fast operation).

I'm not entirely certain what you mean by your second question but basically, I'm willing to allow that the well will be opened for production later - perhaps even sold back to BP for the sake of stopping the oil NOW. Yes, its a short term solution. Yes, it would be better to pursue renewable energy. Yes, it might fall short on punishing or preventing accidents in the future but right now all I care about is stopping the flow and saving the gulf ecosystem. We could have argued long vs short term 30, even 15 days ago but now it's just too late. We are in the middle of it and need to act as fast as possible to stop that flow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Good for you, and besides that it sounds downright capitalistic
This should please all comers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aleric Donating Member (278 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Apparently, not even close
... it would be nice to get some more constructive criticism about it, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. Instead of "the next attempt will be in X days," a realistic statement would be:
"The next real attempt will be realized in about 90 days" (relief well), "but there's a very-strong chance that it won't work."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TransitJohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. The government could revoke their lease right now. n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 04:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC