Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Supreme Court Should Strike Down Arizona Subsidy For Religious Schools

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 03:54 PM
Original message
Supreme Court Should Strike Down Arizona Subsidy For Religious Schools

May 24, 2010

Church-State Watchdog Group Says Tax-Credit Scheme Violates Constitution

The Supreme Court should strike down an Arizona tax-credit scheme that funds private religious education, according to Americans United for Separation of Church and State.

The high court announced today that it will rule on an Arizona program that gives taxpayers a 100 percent credit for donations to school voucher organizations that pay for tuition at religious and other private schools. Most of the money has ended up subsidizing religious education.

“Arizona’s convoluted scheme is a backdoor way of subsidizing religious education,” said the Rev. Barry W. Lynn, executive director of Americans United. “I hope the high court sees through it.”

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals struck down the program last year, holding that it violates the separation of church and state.

In 2002, the Supreme Court upheld a Cleveland voucher plan that funded mostly private religious schools. The court held that vouchers were one option among many available to parents. Critics say the Arizona plan is different because it funds mostly sectarian schools and does not create real choice in education.

The case is Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. Winn.

Americans United is a religious liberty watchdog group based in Washington, D.C. Founded in 1947, the organization educates Americans about the importance of church-state separation in safeguarding religious freedom.

http://www.au.org/media/press-releases/archives/2010/05/supreme-court-should-strike.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 05:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. 100 percent??? there's a 30% credit for energy-saving home improvements, but 100% for this???
:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yup....talk about some fucked up priorities...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC