Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Where are the SUBS?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 06:12 PM
Original message
Where are the SUBS?
We've heard this over and over and over again.

Here you go...

http://edition.cnn.com/video/flashLive/live.html?stream=2

What you see there are ROV arms... I can't tell what they are doing. Just that they are, and I suspect they are setting this for the top kill attempt.

Now this is just to point out that unfortunately what you are seeing there is highly technical, proprietary technology.

Now my view... we will not see anything UNTIL a relief well is drilled.

I fear this will do no difference anyway, but hey...whatever
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Relief wells are a time tested remmedy that fix blowouts...
They are, in fact, the only real remmedy. All the other stuff are stop gap measures to slow the man made asphalt volcano in the gulf.

As long as they don't make the same mistake they did before, and remove all of the heavy drill mud, there should be no problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Then why don't they pre-drill them?
Edited on Mon May-24-10 06:23 PM by Oregone
And somehow cap them, just as a fall back safety measure


This does create another potential point of failure, but is it that volatile if unused with all other safety measures in place?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Well predrilling them would be very hard (given they need to drill into main well)
but I think the government should look into forcing them to partially drill them. If they need to drill down say 35,000 ft. No reason why you can't have a relief well partially drilled to say 30,000ft.

Right? If they had been partially drilled the relief wells could have been completed 2 weeks ago and the well sealed a few days later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Blow outs are rare. Blow out preventers were designed to solve what...
at one time was a common problem. Blowout preventers usually do the job and blowouts only happen when a serious of monumentally stupid fuckups occur. That pretty much describes the whole operation put on by BP.

However, the blowout preventer in this one, as I have read, was not the most modern, and not actually designed to work in the conditions. From what I've read, BP performed a number of "cost saving" actions that led to this. They also did some stupid stuff, such as pumping out the heavy mud used to keep wells form blowing out, thinking that there would be enough weight of water.

Finally, drilling a relief well costs the same as drilling the original well, and the tolerances are much tighter because they have to drill into a narrow shaft about 2 feet cross at the depth of one mile.. It would require two drill ships, at sea, and two drilling rigs on land. Since blowouts are very rare, doubling the cost of the well, it is probably considered prohibitively expensive and pointless since almost all of them would never be used.

What they should do is ban drilling deep wells, or if they must drill, require oversight by agencies with real power to punish the offenders.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. And start by breaking up hte MMS, which they are
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. And it takes months to set for one
I think the WH is cumming to that conclusion too. I will be pleasantly surprised if the top kill works quite honestly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. This is another stopgap measure that might work.
At least they are not going to nuke the well as the Russians are reported to have suggested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Due to the depths it might come to that
they apparently did that on one of their wells.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Even that wouldn't be quick.
I mean, just putting the nuke at the bottom of the ocean on top of the well would create a gigantic fall out problem.

They would need to drill a well shaft and bury the bomb at some depth, like they do for nuclear tests, and let the natural subsidence after a burst destroy the subterranean architecture.

I don't think there are any quick fixes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Nope, based on the Ixtoc I
the window is 9 months at the earliest, at this point I'd say 12, given they have not started any of that actual work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Submariner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. That is not an oil "LEAK".....it is an oil GUSHER under high pressure
Just for clarification.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I know that said a lot of folks
here claim that there are no subs on site. Well very technically they are correct, there are no subs, but these are ROVs.

As you know these are ROV's not technically subs. And as you also know... Alvin, which can go to those depths, don't have the arms we are seeing there to manipulate crap at incredible pressures.

just trying to set some of the record, which is impossible on this site anyway.

Hold it... WE ARE GONNA DIE! dominates and the damage is\will be horrific... but that is far from... life on earth will end because of this. We want to discuss this in combination with everything else that is leading to the sixth great mass extinction, sure... but it is not because of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. ...but what about the busses?
:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Sorry, can't help you there son
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. remember the NOLA busses?
same location, different mode of transportation :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Ah that mess
there were so many errors that should not have been made. They did have a dry run a year before, if you want to talk of on purpose lack of action

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. Ah yes, those shiny, shiny busses
They were the only hope for LA. But that mean Ray Nagin wouldn't use them.

It's a travesty, I tells ya.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
13. The technology for 18,000 ft intercepts has never been tested.
We are at a pivotal point. If the top kill is ineffective, the relief wells are still an unknown quantity. Success with the top kill is really a dire need.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Relief wells is what usually works
the Ixtoc I took nine months... and it was pretty deep too. That is my frame of reference for this mess... all the way to the mud and gas coming up and nasty explosion.

This brings us to the next problem... peak oil. We are there, not that anybody will scream it from the rafters. Why? The risk

reality is... we will NEVER get all the oil out... it comes a point when it becomes prohibitive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. Just hoping the attempt doesn't make things worse...
Relief wells work. They also take time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
19. I just ate one from Vic's deli
It was pretty good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. You are the guy on the Time Warner's commercial
I KNEW IT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC