Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If you believe that the president could be doing more to solve the oil spill.....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 08:46 PM
Original message
If you believe that the president could be doing more to solve the oil spill.....
Edited on Tue May-25-10 09:06 PM by Cant trust em
please post specifically what your idea is and how it would work.

Please don't say something like "Bring together all of the resources possible" or "use the bully pulpit to shame BP to work harder".

I'm not posting this to be snarky, I'm just looking for some answers. The current response feels really inadequate, but I don't know what solutions are remaining.

If you've seen an article, please post it.

Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Identify vulnerable
and the most valuable estuaries/fish nurseries on the Florida coast. Build berms or whatever the foremost environmental scientists think would be best to keep the oil out of them in the short term till we can figure out what to do for the long term. There is still time to do this if they start now esp in the shallows and there would be no shortage of volunteers to help. They had helicopters plopping huge sandbags to plug holes in the levies after Katrina, something similar can be done quickly to mitigate some of the damage before it happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. A guest on Olbermann said to get every oil tanker out there to suck the oil off the surface
Take it away and separate it. Those tankers can hold HUGE volumes.

The author of "Why we hate the oil companies" or something like that. He was an executive or CEO at Shell Oil.

Artillery Shell?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. well he said it could be done
has been done. Where is this tanker?

What is involved in converting the tanker? Are there enough of the types of pumps available? Can the modifications BE made and if so, how long would it take? Someone else mentioned the maneuverability of these tankers being an issue as well.

In short, is this a feasible idea? It SOUNDS great - but does it pass examination? I for one call for a lot of very quick examination!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
23. And BP has 24 of them -- somewhere else, making money for them
according to a Nation editor I saw on Laura Flanders' show today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrMickeysMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
33. This guy was the CEO of Shell Oil, and I agree with him, tell the Dept of Int
... (yes, I'm cross posting to get people to send their suggestions to DOI)

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x8413926
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #33
39. but but but -
I thought we didn't trust "BIG OIL" peoples . . . :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. Fine BP 100 million a day retroactively until they get tankers here to suck
that shit up.

Fine an additional 200 Million a day retroactively until the shit is plugged up.

Charge them 500 million retroactively a week until the shit is clean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. and what does that accomplish, exactly?
Do you think they're not working as hard and as fast and as efficiently as they can? Do you think they are not hemorrhaging money as we speak?

Hell yes they should be fined and investigated and prosecuted!! but I don't see this as helping to make things go any faster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. frankly
they have lied from day one. I think they have done everything they can to cover their asses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Never thought you'd see that shit on DU did ya?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. They have fucking full tankers just out and about waiting for prices to go up
make them put that shit on land in a holding tank and
get them into the Gulf to suck up that shit.

Plus the money can be used to help the people who are going to lose their jobs because of this, for the people who sue the government for lack of regulation, and to pay medical bills of those who will get ill from cleaning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #13
38. I'm trying to find a source
for this - can you please provide some more info on this? Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. +1
Edited on Tue May-25-10 09:22 PM by Individualist
The CEO of Shell Oil was on NBC Nightly News tonight and brought up the matter of bringing in supertankers to suction the oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #10
42. so why can't this be done, so in the meantime the environment
and people whose living is fishing is gone. Damn why is it we can't do anything?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. Damn right! There is a creek by my house
the fine for dumping oil near the creek is $10,000! For a quart of oil. I say we charge those assholes at BP the same fine. $10,000 a quart.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
one_voice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
28. Yup...
hit them where it hurts the most. Bet they find a way to fix this thing, quick, fast and in a hurry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
41. How is that going to happen without Congress?
Is Obama supposed to just demand the money?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. I don't hold the administration responsible for "solving the spill"
What I want from them:

1. Tell BP to allow government/academia to the area to test whatever it is they test and to measure the flow rate so that we know what we are collectively dealing with from an environmental impact standpoint.

2. Tell them not to drop another eyedropper-full of Corexit into the water to attempt to hide the oil. People, animals and marine life are more important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. the UNRECS speak volumes -
those who don't have a clue what can be done but are still bashing away. . . makes you wonder why, doesn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. Excuse me?
I assume the unrecs are from the loyal-to-death-no-matter-what Obama supporters. Not the ones who want an actually functioning LEADER.

Right now I need way more than Hayward's assurance that BP's other gulf wells are not pumping oil. I have no idea what he meant. It would be nice if my LEADER could inform me what he meant and what that means to me. For instance, the Atlantis is considered unsafe by some in the industry. Is it stopped temporarily until the furor dies down? Is it stopped for rigorous inspection? Is it stopped for good? I am any minute expecting to see a photoshop picture of Obama eating cake with a background of dying pelicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. huh?
I'm sorry. I'm having difficulty following your rant.

I'm used to being ACCUSED of being a "loyal-to-death-no-matter-what Obama supporter" (which I'm not. . .) so maybe that's why I'm having trouble getting my head around your post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. They are unrecing because your thread is beyond stupid.
and they don't want it on the greatest page.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. not MY thread...
but how is it "beyond stupid" to ask for credible and viable ideas, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xicano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. For starters:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
11. I truly do not believe Obama can do anything about the actual leak;
however, much more can be done re: cleanup and containment.

If he were to declare the Gulf a National Security Threat or Disaster Zone, he could require that BP continue to work on capping the well, instruct the appropriate govt agency to head up cleanup and containment at BP's expense. If BP balks, he could shut down all their operations and seize their US assets.

I think the biggest problem is the slow response in protecting the wetlands, beaches, etc. At least, that's what the locals are all complaining about, as well they should.

It's been 2 weeks since they requested the Army Corps of Engineers to ok building berms to protect fragile wetlands, estuaries, and still no answer. In the meantime, oil is washing into pelican nesting areas, birds and fish are dying by the hundreds, wetlands are covered in oily goop, effectively killing them, the Gulf economy is being destroyed, etc, etc.

Then there's the problem of boats under the control of BP sitting idle, requests for more boom being ignored, the EPA directive to cease using Corex being defied, the tons of hair, fur, hay, straw, and nylons sitting idly in a warehouse because BP doesn't want to use them. Another problem is the refusal of the EPA to allow skimmers in because they don't remove "enough" oil. So let's get this straight. The EPA would rather NOT recover ANY oil because the skimmers don't meet their standards. How STUPID can they get?

These are ALL things Obama could fix. Had I let my subordinates in the Navy run amok like this I'd have been Courts Martialed in a skinny minute, and I sure as hell wouldn't be sitting here collecting my retirement check. As one of my senior officers told me when I was a Lt, "No decision IS a decision, so lead, follow, or get the hell out of the way!".

The response is too little, too late, and every day that the coastline goes unprotected is another day that brings more death and destruction, and more blame for the POTUS.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. you really need to find a new
news source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Why would I EVER want to take advice from you?
Edited on Tue May-25-10 09:51 PM by dgibby
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Eat your veggies,
brush your teeth.

And be nice to your Mother.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. My mother's been dead for years,
and I'm probably old enough to be your grandmother, but that's another story for another day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. you'd be really really old then ...
I'm sorry about your mom. It never gets any easier no matter how long it's been.


How about - "be nice to others" even when they disagree with you?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. That's a two-way street.
The OP asked for ideas. I put a lot of thought and effort into that post. You snarked on what I wrote. I responded in kind, which is my bad. Sorry. I shouldn't have done that, but I tend to get cranky when I feel I'm being dissed.

I was attempting to relay what I've seen and heard from people who are actually living in the Gulf area, including my great, great nephew and his wife, who are expecting their first child in Oct, and are worried sick about the effect the airborn toxins might have on the baby.

Thank you for your kind words re: my mother. I appreciate that very much.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
18. dredge barrier islands to protect the wetlands
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
24. This framing is problematic. BP committed what amounts to a crime in the Gulf.
You don't leave criminals in charge of the crime scene. You secure them and then you secure the scene.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SargeUNN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
29. I find it interesting that the station I got kicked off of in Mississippi
because some teabagger didn't like my progressive message is now shouting for Obama to get the government involved. These are the same people who claimed government was too big and intrusive as well as Obama was taking away their freedoms. I just went to a group from that area and they are blasting the Government for not doing enough although they claimed Obama was trying to be dictator. Hey they think pray is the answer to all the problems and Barbour carried their county last time even though he screwed them royally after Katrina.

So can you guess what they would say if Obama ordered a takeover of the operation and seized control of BP? How do you win with these morons?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tranche Donating Member (913 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
30. Fire Rahm and name Code Pink, Kucinich, and Ralph Nader to lead a progressive effort at capping
the well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lamp_shade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 03:34 AM
Response to Reply #30
36. Yes. Lower the pink people down there with big pink protest signs. That oughtta do it. lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #30
40. ralph nadar???
omg - people ARE losing their minds over this.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
32. I'm sure he has access to the best ideas
I would wager they are doing the best they can.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrMickeysMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
34. Link to Dept of Interior... SEND YOUR SUGGESTIONS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 02:09 AM
Response to Original message
35. Stop all offshore drilling until the oil INDUSTRY caps this well.
Follow Norway's example and nationalize the industry. Norways's Statoil operates the most environmentally friendly offshore oil rigs in the world -- because it's state-owned



http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joe_conason/2010/05/03/norway
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #35
45. Mexico also has a state owned oil operation.
Pemex doesn't have a good track record for safety or environment as I understand it.

Not to say that we couldn't do a good job with nationalizing an oil operation. But I think a lot of it comes down to execution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. Color me surprised that Mexico state owned op doesn't have a good
track record. Not.

Mexico is rift with corruption so it is to be expected that that is no effective control over state owned industry. Unlike Mexico, Norway is not rift with corruption because it has systems in place to enforce regulations and effectively punish those who engage in corrupt practices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lamp_shade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 03:36 AM
Response to Original message
37. Not one answer to your question. Telling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
43. I have to question why 'bring together all the resources' doesn't qualify as an answer
I believe there are those out there who have worked some huge cleanup efforts which were more successful than this is proving to be. The following article about one of these people and the run around he's gotten from BP illustrates my point and shows my reason for thinking not enough is being done. By letting BP remain in charge of everything and shut out help they don't want (imo cause it might cost them too much) we are missing out.

According to Pozzi, that mishap, kept under wraps for close to two decades and first reported by Esquire, dumped nearly 800 million gallons of oil into the Persian Gulf, which would make it more than 70 times the size of the Exxon Valdez spill.

But remarkably, by employing a fleet of empty supertankers to suck crude off the water's surface, Pozzi's team was not only able to clean up the spill, but also salvage 85 percent of the oil, he says.

"We took out of the water so it would save the environment off the Arabian Gulf, and then we put it into tanks until we could figure out how to clean it," he told AOL News.

While BP, the oil giant at the center of the recent accident, works to stanch the leak from the sunken Deepwater Horizon rig, Pozzi insists the company should be following his lead.


http://www.aolnews.com/nation/article/could-cleanup-fix-for-gulf-oil-spill-lie-in-secret-saudi-disaster/19476863
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #43
44. Bringing a fleet of tankers to suck up the oil is an answer.
"Bring together more resources" sounds a lot like saying "Just work harder".

I'm looking for specific, rather than vague.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
46. Immediately require all offshore rigs to have pre-drilled relief wells
Edited on Wed May-26-10 11:55 AM by jgraz
Canada does this in the arctic and somehow the oil industry survives.

Edit: And fire Ken Salazar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC