Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did Government Officials Actually Read BP's Oil Spill Response Plan?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 03:28 AM
Original message
Did Government Officials Actually Read BP's Oil Spill Response Plan?
Edited on Wed May-26-10 03:29 AM by maddezmom
Did Government Officials Actually Read BP's Oil Spill Response Plan?
Wednesday May 26, 2010
¬snip¬

The BP Regional Oil Spill Response Plan - Gulf of Mexico, dated June 30, 2009, covers all of the giant oil company's offshore operations in the Gulf, not just the Deepwater Horizon, which caused the massive oil spill that is spreading out of control and threatening fragile ecosystems and local economies all along the Gulf Coast. The BP regional oil spill plan for the Gulf of Mexico:


•Contains no information about tracking sub-surface oil plumes from deepwater blowouts such as those now billowing from the damaged oil well that the Deepwater Horizon was drilling before it exploded on April 20;


•Lists "Sea Lions, Seals, Sea Otters Walruses" as "Sensitive Biological Resources" in the Gulf, showing pretty clearly that some portions of the plan were copied from plans previously prepared for Arctic exploration;


•Gives a a Japanese home shopping website as the link to one of its "primary equipment providers for BP in the Gulf of Mexico Region rapid deployment of spill response resources on a 24 hour, 7 days a week basis;"

more: http://environment.about.com/b/2010/05/26/did-government-officials-actually-read-bps-oil-spill-response-plan.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 03:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. The Government ain't worth shit.
Edited on Wed May-26-10 03:43 AM by FrenchieCat
In terms of priorities, it is possible that it wasn't read...since BP is one
of various oil companies doing drilling offshore for years now....
And since they probably didn't have any way of knowing that in the shitstorm
of redoing all of government from top to bottom in a little over a year,
that this would be the next disaster, specific to BP, they may have been
doing a whole lot of things in reference to energy,
cause there was so much to fucking do.

But since this administration ain't worth anything,
perhaps it is best that it isn't the government
that owned those rigs in all of those years,
cause the shit might have gotten fucked up long ago.

I'm relieved that we are going after government as being ineffective and lame....
cause that's what the tea party folks believe too.

Plus it takes the pressure off of BP! So I think this approach is a winner!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 04:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I'd say the people that were responsible for reading this report aren't worth shit
as for the whole of gov't, I'd disagree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 03:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yes, this proves the company used a badly reformatted Arctic plan.
Big companies virtually run the government sectors charged with regulating them. First they oppose regulation. Once it happens, they take over the regulation process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 04:23 AM
Response to Original message
4. That buck shouldn't have stopped with BP.
Edited on Wed May-26-10 04:24 AM by Are_grits_groceries
ANY administration should have carefully read this report and all options considered, not just BP's. Once the gusher began, this line of defense was critical to the area.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 05:07 AM
Response to Original message
5. I believe they were probably preoccupied with hookers and a meth pipe
from what I've been reading.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustABozoOnThisBus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 06:06 AM
Response to Original message
6. BP has an excellent response plan
1. Get signed nondisclosure agreements from any survivors.
2. Mobilize public relations personnel.
3. Mobilize legal defense teams.
4. Contribute even more lavishly to Representatives and Senators.
5. Launch far-reaching search for patsies and scapegoats.

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. That's the plan.
Survivors said the first thing they had to do on reaching land was provide a urine sample.

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/business/7000866.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
8. PEER is Tops!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanonRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
9. Does it talk about chewing gum for leaks?
Just wonderin'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC