Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should Canada Continue Drilling for Oil and Gas Under the Great Lakes?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 07:52 AM
Original message
Should Canada Continue Drilling for Oil and Gas Under the Great Lakes?
http://barbara-spring.blogspot.com/2010/04/offshore-oil-drilling-disaster.html

Sunday, April 25, 2010

Offshore Oil Drilling Disaster

NEW ORLEANS, Louisiana (AFP) – Oil is leaking from the ruptured well of a large rig that exploded, burnt and sank in the Gulf of Mexico earlier this week, the US Coast Guard said Saturday.The Coast Guard estimated that up to 1,000 of barrels of oil, or 42,000 gallons (158,987 liters) were spewing each day from a riser and a drill pipe...



In light of the oil disaster in the Gulf, here is an excerpt from my book, The Dynamic Great Lakes


The Great Lakes are large, but fragile.

Presently, offshore drilling for oil and gas is not permitted in the Great Lakes. The eight governors of the states bordering the Great Lakes ban oil drilling in the Great Lakes because they are so vulnerable to oil contamination.

Canada has allowed 55 wells in Lake Erie.

Yet some oil exploration companies have drilled under Lake Michigan from on shore sites by means of directional drilling and want to explore for more oil under the Great Lakes. So far twelvewells have been drilled from offshore using directional drilling to go

Accidental oil spills in the Great Lakes have the potential for far more serious damage than an oil spill at sea because the water in the Great Lakes takes a long time to circulate through the system. An oil spill would affect the whole ecosystem from the microscopic plankton to the eagle with a seven-foot wingspan. It would affect the people who depend on Great Lakes water for domestic, agricultural and manufacturing purposes.

*The Dynamic Great Lakes was published in 2001. Now the number of Canadian offshore wells has increased along with the possibility of oil spills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
safeinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Save the walleye
and perch.

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Millions of people use that water for drinking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. Simply "NO!" eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. I don't have a problem with directional drilling
It doesn't have the same engineering nightmares that the BP fiasco presents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. And you can guarantee that its safe right?
Seems like I have heard similar rhetoric before.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I can't guarantee
that when you flip on the light switch, your whole house won't blow up.

All I'm saying is that there are areas that are easier to deal with when a problem comes up, and dry land seems to be one of them, especially when compared with a mile under sea level.

We're going to get the energy from somewhere, I'd rather they did slant drilling from the land rather than go straight in from the water. That's not going to help us get energy from way out in the deep water, but perhaps new technologies can be developed to make that possible from far away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
6. no....there`s enough problems with the asian carp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC