Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama to hold presser Thrusday (first one in nearly a year)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
robinblue Donating Member (385 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 03:33 PM
Original message
Obama to hold presser Thrusday (first one in nearly a year)




http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/20100526/pl_ynews/ynews_pl2270_3
Public opinion turning against Obama on oil spill

16 mins ago

The American public is losing its patience with President Obama over his handling of the Gulf Coast oil spill.

In the five weeks since an explosion on the Deepwater Horizon rig sent hundreds of thousands of gallons of oil spilling into the Gulf of Mexico, Obama had largely escaped political fallout. But as BP attempts yet again to seal the leak, a new USA Today/Gallup Poll finds a majority of Americans unhappy with Obama's handling of the spill. According to the poll, 53 percent rate Obama's handling "poor" or "very poor"; 43 percent believe Obama is doing a good job.
.............



What will no doubt give the White House pause is the shifting public sentiment on Obama's handling of the spill. Earlier this month, the president seemed to be escaping most of the public wrath over the disaster. An Associated Press poll released May 13 found mostly good-to-neutral marks for Obama's role in the mess: 42 percent approved, 33 percent disapproved and 21 percent said they were neutral.

.............

White House officials aren’t unaware of the shift. In recent days, they’ve stepped up their media strategy in response to the spill. Tomorrow, Obama will hold his first full-fledged news conference in nearly a year to take questions on the issue. And Friday, he is scheduled to make his second visit to the Gulf.

Will it be enough to placate an increasingly frustrated public?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Still more than Bush did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. let's focus on the now - is the 1st full press briefing in a long time acceptable for someone who
Edited on Wed May-26-10 03:39 PM by Divine Discontent
promised to be transparent? That's the question, not, "is it more frequently than B*sh" (the worst f*cking excuse for a "president" this country has seen - by that argument, he doesn't have to do a damned thing and he still will be more proactive than dumya)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. The WH press corps says that Obama has held more press conferences than that
And they are not really Obama's biggest fans.

Qualifying "formal" to make the number smaller is pretty disingenuous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. That's damning with faint praise, actually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #16
29. remember when presidents USED to take a flurry of questions about a range of topics on a regular
basis? so the reporters had things they could tell their readers who wanted to know what the president had to say on a host of current issues was actually saying - instead of hearing it through the grapevine, and gossip, and staffers, etc...

it is sad. Obama is a huge improvement over Dumya, but is that EVER saying much? Hardly...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
26. Still better than the worst ever
Great. Wonderful. Is that the new standard for American Presidents? At least I'm not shrub! I'm better than Stalin! But not as good as Nixon?

Second worst ever?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Blue Marble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. We really do not need more media strategy.
We need real leadership!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinblue Donating Member (385 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. I noticed that comment also and agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. Obama held a full press conference in April, and in Febuary.
With several smaller pressers.

Fox News has been pushing a meme that Obama hasn't held press conferences in over a year. It's a load of bull.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinblue Donating Member (385 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. "the president hadn't held a formal news conference since July 22. "


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/20100526/pl_ynews/ynews_pl2269


WH pulling out all the stops to defend oil spill handling to media

26 mins ago

The White House, continuing its effort to push back against negative media coverage of the government's handling of the oil spill, held an on-the-record meeting Wednesday between incident commander Thad Allen and several influential political columnists.

Among those on hand in the Roosevelt Room meeting were the Washington Post's E.J. Dionne and Eugene Robinson, the Wall Street Journal's Jerry Seib and Newsweek's Howard Fineman.

Robinson told Yahoo! News that he was invited by email Tuesday night and found the meeting "quite helpful" in getting direct answers to questions about the administration's handling of the mess in the gulf. He also said that bringing in leading opinion makers — as the White House has done before, on such issues as Afghanistan and health care reform — can be helpful to the administration in making it clearer what steps it's taking.

"I think they want to do what everybody in this city always wants to do: Get their side of the story across," he said.

After a contentious briefing Friday at which reporters complained that their oil-spill questions weren't being answered, Allen joined Press Secretary Robert Gibbs in the briefing room Monday. Meanwhile, administration officials including Obama adviser David Axelrod have been hitting the cable airwaves.

And Thursday will be the next move by the White House to help shift the narrative: President Obama is scheduled to take about 10 questions from reporters at 12:45 p.m. Eastern. Just Tuesday, the Washington Examiner's Byron York wrote how the president hadn't held a formal news conference since July 22. "A lot can happen in 307 days," he wrote, "which is far longer than George W. Bush or Bill Clinton ever went between news conferences."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Mark Knoller disagrees.
"CBS News Radio reporter Mark Knoller, the press corps unofficial record-keeper, agrees the July presser was the 'last formal, prime-time news White House news conference,' but points out that Obama did make a surprise appearance in the briefing room in February, and took six questions. 'I count that as a White House news conference,' Knoller said, noting that other 'news organizations seem to be ignoring that session so they can report he hasn't held a news conference since last July.'"

Calderone added: "Ann Compton, a long-time ABC News White House correspondent, also pointed out that Obama took some questions at the Nuclear Security Summit in April."

http://mediamatters.org/strupp/201005260051
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinblue Donating Member (385 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. we are talking of the prime time formal ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. If even the press corps does not define press conferences that way, why do you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinblue Donating Member (385 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Because I think that a prime time one is the real one.simple as that and
you think differently. I have no problem with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. And the press corps thinks differently too.
Edited on Wed May-26-10 04:06 PM by SemiCharmedQuark
In fact the only one pushing this meme is Fox.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. No you don't.
You're just shifting goal posts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. No you don't. You are just trying to backpedal after embarassing yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Blue Marble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. Because we can think for ourselves.
I know the difference between answering a few questions and a full press conference.
You might remember when all presidents did have those regularly and in prime time.

It is clear that there is a definite "media strategy" to keep this president in a controlled
environment and distanced from his subjects er... I mean citizens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. Is that what you call it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #12
32. "and took six questions" = Whee!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. blah blah blah blah blah
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. Glory Days!!1!
:o
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. well, it can't hurt! over 50% polled said "POOR" in rating Obama's handling of the spill. ouch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. News Conference by the President, 2/9/10
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
9. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
10. BS. He has not only held pressers in the past year, but numerous interviews, town hall meetings...
...gave the State of the Union address, went in front of live cameras and faced the Republicans down... TWICE. You can't, with any possible amount of spin, say that President Obama hasn't faced the nation, faced questions from critics and the opposition and faced journalists. Of all the things one might criticize this President over, running from the press is far beyond inaccurate, its an outright lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. It is bullshit. Even WH press corps admits it's bullshit.
And yet here it is...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MyNameGoesHere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
15. Jesus Christ!
There is nothing Obama can do about the oil leak, DADT, The wars, or the economy. Why the fuck should he waste his time dealing with the press and the public? He is only a man after all. What the fuck do you people expect from him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
23. You've been called on your bullshit. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
27. I thought they say his ass was on Television too much?
Edited on Wed May-26-10 04:25 PM by FrenchieCat
Did they change their minds?

Last press conference was when the only thing that was reported on it was what he thought
about the Black professor being arrested in his own home. They called him a racist for it.

I'm fucking way passed tired of the media and what the demand.
They can kiss my ass, and so can those who parrot their fucking manipulative bullshit talking points.

This place was supposed to be where one could come to get away from the manufactured bullshit,
but guess that is false advertising.

The media ain't done shit for America! Fuck 'em!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. I see...
you haven't mastered double-think yet :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Nope...not familiar with that,
and that would have to be a good thing! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. Every once and a while...
I dial into hate wing radio. The disconnect from reality is unbelievable. Hell, when the Miss USA was named they were claiming that she was in legal with muslim extremists. I nearly wrecked my truck on that one, and listening to the logic knocked a few points off of my IQ. This is how I felt after hearing it :)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WAOxY_nHdew
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
30. and when it comes to smaller press briefings ---
The numbers speak for themselves: During his first year in office, President Bill Clinton did 252 such Q & A sessions — an average of one every weekday. Bush did 147. Obama did 46, according to Towson University professor Martha Kumar.

“Too many of the president’s meetings are ‘no coverage’ for my taste,” said ABC’s Ann Compton. “That is a stark reduction in access for us.” They are accused of controlling the message to the same degree as their predecessors, to whom they said they would not be like when they got into office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. And there I go getting all 'facty!', it may not be as contentious as some of the posts on here
Edited on Wed May-26-10 05:21 PM by Divine Discontent
screaming and cursing, but it's the facts... do with them what you will!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. Can you give us comparitive stats on # of speeches given, unscreened town hall meetings attended,
legislation passed in the first 18 months. That would be really informative,
cause there ain't nothing better than context to accompany any numbers!

Thanks in advance "Facty"! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. town halls? you mean where people, who are typically approved and given tickets in advance tell the
politicians they're so awesomey! And speeches? I could care less about speeches. I want hard questions being asked directly to the man in charge, the kind that turned George Dumbass B*sh's face deep red with resentment that someone dare ask him a tough question.

I provided facts, and you can ignore the numbers that are way out of proportion and not even close, and contextualize press briefings to speeches all you wish to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC