Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Oil Math

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 07:10 PM
Original message
Oil Math
38 days since the explosion
19,000 barrels per day leaking
40 gallons per barrel

38 x 19,000 x 40 = 28,880,000 gallons of oil into the gulf + or - gallons ?????

:cry:

Exxon Valdez was about 10,000,000 gallons
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LeftyFingerPop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. 42 gallons per barrel.
30,324,000 gallons. And you can bet that the 19,000 bbls per day is an understatement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Understated by half... that's my bet...
Ugh...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. 12K to 19K bpd is the Federal government's estimate
Edited on Thu May-27-10 07:59 PM by Statistical
using 3 different methods and a team of 12 independents scientists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyFingerPop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I know, but I don't believe it.
I am sure that much higher numbers will be released once it is plugged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. So you believe one scientist who briefly analyzed a resolution clip and said UP TO 70K bpd
Edited on Thu May-27-10 08:12 PM by Statistical
However then went on to caution that more study was required and the low resolution and single angle made any definitive evaluation difficult.
Now that is taken as gospel, the "70K gospel".

However on the other hand a study ordered by Obama over the course of 2 weeks which independently looked at three different methods to measure flow rate and then published their results is suspect.
Why because you don't like their conclusion? Had the federal study said 100K to 200K barrels would you still be claiming the single scientist w/ low resolution video was accurate?

Ever heard of selection bias?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyFingerPop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I typically do not believe any number published by the Government.
Because they are almost always revised later. Just because they say it is 12 to 19 now does not mean that is what the tests showed. Especially at this point in time, there is a good reason to lowball the number.

I am not questioning the validity of their tests, I am questioning the numbers they decided to report after performing those tests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Despite the fact that it wasn't govt employees doing the test.
It was a dozen well known and respected members of scientific community who have reputation staked on those results.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyFingerPop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. OK, but I still say it will be revised.
I'll buy you a virtual beer if I am wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyFingerPop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Probably...
Edited on Thu May-27-10 08:17 PM by LeftyFingerPop
considering the particle analysis done by that Purdue professor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. there is now a widget, save yourself the effort
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
11. Ixtoc gushed for over 9 months
and spilt 140,000,000 gallons before it was capped. We're better equipped and 30 years smarter, but it would still be extraordinary if we got this one under control anytime soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC