Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Does Jim Webb Oppose The Repeal Of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 04:10 AM
Original message
Why Does Jim Webb Oppose The Repeal Of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell"?
~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 04:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. Politics.
The answer is always politics. Maybe his polls show he'd lose if he supported it. Maybe he made some promise to someone with a lot of money and/or influence not to support it. Who knows?

One thing, though, and I'm always surprised when people don't realize this. Votes in Congress are for show. The decisions have already been made before it makes the floor 95% of the time. Reid knows who will vote with him, who will vote against him, and who he can sway. More than that, there's a lot of vote swapping going on. If Reid knows (hypothetically--I don't know if it's true in this case) that he has enough votes to win without Webb, he may free Webb up to vote against the bill if Webb's numbers show he would be in trouble otherwise. That way the bill still passes and Webb gets to keep his seat (again, that's hypothetical--I don't know what the actual numbers are in this case). Naturally, if the bill will lose anyway, Reid could free up more people, and if it's very close, Reid will monitor the votes until the end to be sure there aren't any surprises before freeing up such votes.

LBJ told a story about his first term in Congress. Sam Rayburn (I think) came to him asking for support on a bill, selling it hard, and LBJ agreed to vote yes. He then learned that his district was overwhelmingly against the bill, so he went timidly back to Rayburn and asked if he could get out of his promise. Rayburn spoke sternly, called him a promise-breaker, asked if he expected loyalty from the party at election time when he showed none to them--all the usual tactics. Finally, Rayburn sighed deeply and said "Lyndon, you are much too promising to throw away like that. Tell you what. You sit in the front row, and I'll monitor the votes, and if I see that we don't need your vote, I'll give you a sign that you can vote no."

So Lyndon sat on the front row, nervously watching Rayburn and the vote, when he glanced around, and realized there were a dozen or more other freshman Representatives all sitting on the front row, nervously watching Rayburn and the vote, and he realized that Rayburn had all the votes he needed or wanted. He was just making the freshmen think they owed him something, so he could use it on them later.

That's how politics works. Who knows what Webb really believes, or what is agreed to behind the scenes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 06:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. Because a part of his brain doesn't work, which unfortunately increases his stupid quotient.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oceansaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 06:46 AM
Response to Original message
3. bigotry is usually the reason....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 07:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. So President Clinton was a bigot?
After all he created DADT in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. He was pandering to bigots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. just as bad. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. Agreed, but wouldn't you assume Webb was doing the same?
I'm not defending anybody, but most of these kind of policy positions are dictated by politics, not bigotry. And I'm not saying that that makes it okay or ever better. If you ask me, someone who won't stand up for what's right when they know it is right is just as bad as one who acts out of hate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Have you read his reason? Its in Post #4
I have mixed feelings about it. Its quite rationale, but still does not sit well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. Here is his statement on his "no" vote
"Secretary Gates and Admiral Mullen have both stated that military men and women in all services and at all levels should be engaged as the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy is reviewed. For this reason, in February DOD instituted a comprehensive review process that they viewed to be important in their roles as the senior leaders of the Department of Defense. The Obama Administration agreed with the importance of this process in its letter of May 24, stating that ‘ideally the Department of Defense Comprehensive Review... would be completed before the Congress takes any legislative action.’

"DOD reaffirmed this position in a statement on May 25: ‘Secretary Gates continues to believe that ideally the DOD review should be completed before there is any legislation to repeal the Don’t Ask Don’t Tell law...’ The chiefs of all four military services also concur in this view.

"I agree with this viewpoint. I have met personally with the officials in charge of this review, and communicated my own observations regarding the comprehensive survey that will be a part of this review. I see no reason to pre-empt the process that our senior Defense Department leaders put into motion, and I am concerned that many members of the military would view such a move as disrespectful to the importance of their roles in this process."


link: http://www.wavy.com/dpp/news/Senator-Webb-issues-statement-on-no-vote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
24. would it have been right to have white soldiers weigh in before accepting black ones?
i don't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
S_E_Fudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
5. My Senator...I worked pretty hard for him in 2006....
While I can't see myself voting Republican in 2012...I certainly won't be putting the same effort in for him this time...

He has done some good things, but has been a major disappointment on several issues lately...

It was the activist Democratic base in Northern Virginia that worked so hard to get him in 4 years ago...if he continues poking them in the eye I don't think he will be able to count on the same enthusiasm again...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
7. Why? Virginia, is why.
The state that just elected a misogynist right wing, Liberty University governor and a teabagger AG. With that sort of electorate, what else do you expect? Bernie Sanders?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
8. It is a profile in craven, political cowardice.
I expected better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tailormyst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
10. Either he is a bigot or he is a coward
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crazyjoe Donating Member (921 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
11. because he is representing his constituents
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. and if his constituents...
favor the repeal of the Civil Rights act (which I am sure most of them do), then he should back that, too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. dupe. nt
Edited on Fri May-28-10 01:00 PM by awoke_in_2003
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #11
25. Got the poll to back that up?
http://www.sldn.org/news/archives/new-poll-shows-8-out-of-10-americans-favor-repealing-dont-ask-dont-tell/


Washington, DC - A new CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll released today shows 79% support for repealing the military's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" ban on lesbian, gay and bisexual service members. Only 18% of respondents thought lesbian and gay service personnel should not be allowed to serve openly.

"The American people are fully in support of open service," said Steve Ralls, communications director for Servicemembers Legal Defense Network (SLDN). "Today's poll is the latest showing broad support for repeal of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," and reflects an overwhelming consensus among the public that national security is more important than federal discrimination. Now, it is time for Members of Congress to step up and lift the ban once and for all."

The CNN poll follows a 2005 Boston Globe poll also finding 79% support for repeal. That same poll found that large "majorities of Republicans, regular churchgoers, and even people with negative attitudes toward gays think gays and lesbians should be allowed to serve openly in the military." A similar Gallup poll found 91% support for open service among Americans aged 18-29. A December 2006 Zogby poll found that 73% of troops surveyed are comfortable with lesbians and gays.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crazyjoe Donating Member (921 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-10 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. then he will or course be easily defeated in the next election,
that's how our republic operates. Funny how polls around here are only reliable when they agree with our side. What's the term? oh yea
"bullshit poll"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newtothegame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
12. I swear we were just worshipping this guy like 3 years ago...my memory fails me. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. Let's be honest...the guy he was running against was a lot worse.
Remember Senor Macaca?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
14. He says it's because he wants to give the Pentagon time to complete the study
Of course he knows full well that if they do that it will never get repealed because it doesn't stand a chance in the next congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
15. Because he is a bigoted ingrate
He's a multi faceted hack who is now going to be flying without a net. If it were not for the kind words of others, he'd have been toast ages ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dont TS Me Brah Donating Member (129 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
17. because the majority of his constituents are redneck bigots? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
18. Because Webb is a former Reaganite
and even though he left the GOP that old hardline military conservatism is still alive in him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubledamerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
23. camel 6
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaydeeBug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
26. He's not telling. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaydeeBug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
27. He's not telling. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC