Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A different kind of death penalty debate - the death of criminal corporations

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 09:42 AM
Original message
A different kind of death penalty debate - the death of criminal corporations
I think we should have a death penalty for corporations. Charge them criminally and hold a trial. If found guilty, give them a sentence. That sentence could range up to death. In that case, the corporation's assets would be seized and placed into receivership. The assets would then be sold to the highest bidders and the proceeds paid to clean up their mess, with the excess, if any, going to pay off their stockholders.

"Why punish the stockholders?" you might ask. Well, who would invest in a shady company? I want to disincent the capitalization of these ongoing criminal enterprises.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. BINGO!!! If corporations cause death and catastrophe then those who crafted the lethal policies
deserve appropriate punishment. Death penalty in those states who HAVE the death penalty - like Texas. Or...life in jail...which would be my preference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Exactly. At this point corporate malfeasance is at a staggering fucking level
ZERO accountability, all by design
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. YAY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. who would invest in a shady company?
Just about everyone I know if they thought they could make a buck.

Honest answer.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Don, I had that very same thought
Yes, there will always be investors ....... until they started to have a history of losing BIG money. the real payoff from this idea is probably way down the line. But I thin k if enough "big investors" lose enough money, they'll stop investing, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. Not saying Walmart is shady, but don't shop there and have never owned their stock
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
4. Now *there's* a death penalty I can strongly support!
Hey, if they want the rights of persons, they can have the consequences of persons, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gravity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
6. Corporations are already sold to the highest bidder
that is what shareholders are. It is an unnecessary and redundant step.

Shareholders aren't going to have any knowledge of the crimes anymore than the police, so it is not fair to put excess punishment on them. White collar criminals lie all the time to the public.

Just punish the people in the corporations who committed the crimes and you can slap fines on the corporations to clean up any mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. You have knowledge. I have knowledge. We can choose to disinvest any time we wish
And that's the point. You'll LOOK for what they're doing and make your investment decisions accordingly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gravity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. You are talking about non public knowledge
By the time the shareholders know about the crimes, it is too late for them to do anything about it. The crimes will be factored into the stock price instantly.

Chances are that the CEO or someone else in the organization is covering up their wrong doings to not attract attention from law enforcement and regulatory agencies. They don't attract investors by selling their crimes.

Shareholders are going to be punished anyways from the fines and in some cases receive the death penalty in terms of bankruptcy, which can occur if the fines are too great for the company to recover from. The mechanism is already in place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Halliburton and KBR still trade nicely
I rest my case
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
8. This is a conservative idea
They might just get on board if you tell them you want to return to the good antebellum days of Andrew Jackson. In the 1830s, corporate charters were a fixed duration, and at the end, you had to wind up the business, pay expenses for damages the business caused, liquidate it and give the shareholders their return on investment. What we see now it the slippery slope of allowing a few to renew their charter, roll over the books, and continue operations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtrockville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
9. Now THAT'S a death penalty I could support!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
11. Why not kill all corporations off?
the whole concept is just a legal ploy to enrich the righ and shield their shareholders from liabilities.

We don't need corporations.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Commonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
12. It's all about limited liability.
That needs to change...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
14. Hey if Citizens United says that corporations are people.....
Then they should absolutely be subjected to the same laws wexare! BP can go first! :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC