Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

'Don't ask' bill at veto risk

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 05:19 AM
Original message
'Don't ask' bill at veto risk
Edited on Sat May-29-10 05:25 AM by Skip Intro

WASHINGTON -- The bill repealing the ban on gays serving openly in the military could present the Obama administration with a problem: It also contains money for projects the Pentagon considers wasteful.

The White House has threatened to veto any bill that contains money for weapons programs that Defense Secretary Robert Gates is trying to eliminate as part of his campaign to tame the Pentagon budget.

As a result, President Barack Obama could end up vetoing Congress' repeal of the ban on gays in the military, a legal change he promised to push through during his campaign for the White House.

Late Thursday night, the House passed an amendment to the defense authorization bill repealing the 1993 "don't ask, don't tell" law. But it also passed an amendment providing $500 million to continue developing a second engine for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter. The House approved the entire bill, including both amendments, Friday in a vote of 229-186.

"Gates has made clear that killing the alternative engine is a top priority," said Todd Harrison, a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. "He is putting his foot down."

http://www.postandcourier.com/news/2010/may/29/dont-ask-bill-at-veto-risk/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 05:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. A Poisin Pill Rider...
... these things should be banned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 05:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. Sigh. Nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 05:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. Sign the bill with a signing statement that explains Obama reads the second engine
as an item to be done only after all other military needs are fully paid for. (which will NEVER happen, look at the poor VA)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 06:21 AM
Response to Original message
4. Kabuki theatre
which is providing cover for which? is the rider a convenient cover for vetoeing a bill that either the military, the republicans or Obama doesn't want, or is the rider a cover for the pork barrel that the republicans want and the president/military doesn't want?

either way, I think this will mean the death of the repeal of DADT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PFunk Donating Member (687 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 06:50 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I think you might be right.
Edited on Sat May-29-10 06:50 AM by PFunk
However, poison pill or not if Obama does veto this bill then the majority of the Gay community that once voted for him in 08' will probably just sit on their hands in '10 and '12 because of it. NOT a god thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. I think it's pork barrel trading
& that Obama will sign it anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
6. I will be very surprised if he vetoes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. well, I think you should prepare yourself for that possibility.
that way you won't be surprised if it happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
8. Come on just do as signing statement, be bold Mr President,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
discocrisco01 Donating Member (524 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. C-17
I wonder if it is going to more C-17 production. More C-17s = more work for me.

Even though I think that it is wasteful program and should be eliminated, it mean work for me at my job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Why is the C-17 a waste? We have flown the wings off most of our air transports
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flubadubya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. BOLD...
is a character trait Mr. Obama has yet to display, unfortunately. x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
12. Poison Pill...A DC specialty. Signing statements won't stop it either
FWIW, the alternate engine is probably a good thing to do
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC