Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I was totally for Sestak in the primary

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 05:41 AM
Original message
I was totally for Sestak in the primary
But Joe kind of seems nuts on C-SPAN.

In other C-SPAN weirdness... were they trying to blame that black worker for the disaster?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 05:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm impressed with Joe...
... and see him as a better representative of the people than 98% of the people in Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 06:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. that's really not saying very much
(being a better rep than 98% of those currently in congress, that is)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. You're pretty smart for a 'Husker
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. ouch - that stung
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. I still am for Sestak
even though the press is trying to paint him in a bad light, I feel I see through that attempt. Wanta see a couple nuts look at what I have to deal with sometime and then you'd be like me and appreciate someone like Joe. methinks anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 06:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. The "car thief" is trying to ruin the guy...
Dirty Darrell wants a repub to win that election and he don't care how he plays the game. Winning is all that matters to the GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 06:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. You bet he is
The gop should be outlawed for the treasonous group that they have become.

I used to think that they were pretty much like the democratic party back through the years but when I read about the shit they were doing back in the 20's and 30's they weren't any different than they are today. The difference between the repukes and the dems is black to white.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. The "Party of Lincoln" never was the "Party of Lincoln"
Ever since its inception in 1856, it has always been the Party of Big Money, made up originally of moneyed Whigs who had become so unpopular that they needed a name change to hide their identity. So they seized upon the growing popularity of the Abolitionist movement, found their man in Abraham Lincoln, got him to do what they wanted him to do (defeat the South), then bumped him off and made life miserable for his successor, Andrew Johnson, even going so far as to impeach Johnson when he dared to try to fire one of the most egregious of Lincoln's Cabinet members, Edwin Stanton. Once Johnson was out of the way, he was replaced by the most corrupt administration up to that time-- that of Republican U.S.Grant.

Once Grant had finished his two terms, the Republicans stole the next presidential election (1876) from the real winner, Samuel Tilden (in basically the same way they stole the 2000 election from Al Gore, and with Florida figuring prominently in the Republican shenanigans as well). When that Republican president, Rutherford B. Hayes, dared to show some autonomy, he was replaced with James Garfield. But Garfield showed some backbone, so he was bumped off and replaced by Chester Arthur, who had been expected to be little more than a Republican sock puppet. But when Arthur began to question his masters, he was dumped unceremoniously for James G. Blaine, in 1884. Blaine lost the election (even the Republicans couldn't steal that one), so the Republicans then got Benjamin Harrison, the grandson of "Old Tippecanoe" to run, and win, in 1888. And when I say "win", that means he got fewer popular votes than his Democratic opponent, Grover Cleveland. Cleveland came back to win outright in the next election, but in the election of 1896, the Republican, this time William McKinley, won and did the bidding for the Republicans. But he was assassinated and replaced by Theodore Roosevelt, who had been considered to be a loose cannon within the Republican Party. Although Roosevelt embraced the Republican doctrine of imperialism, he went after the trusts (robber barons) and made a lot of enemies in the process.

Although Roosevelt was elected in his own right in 1904, he decided to sit out the 1908 election, preferring instead to hand over the reins to his friend, William Howard Taft. But Taft was too easily manipulated by the moneyed elite, which irritated Roosevelt, so Roosevelt challenged Taft in the 1912 Republican primary. Even though Roosevelt might have actually won, the moneyed elites made sure that their man Taft got the nomination. Roosevelt became so annoyed that he decided to run as a 3rd party candidate, and was shot and almost killed during the campaign.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 06:19 AM
Response to Original message
4. Looks Like Someone Bought The Spin...
Or should I say the C-SPIN. Right now they're trying to raise muck on this non-story with one of those "?" sessions (what did Sustak do wrong?????) and "Much ado About Mr. Sustak"...all framed as if he was either the perp or the victim of some major scandal. Fortunately most the callers so far have called the GOOP on this diversion, yet just by C-SPIN giving this "credibility", it kicks this non-story further down the road.

As someone in another post pointed out...hopefully this is a reminder of what will happen if the GOOP gains control of the House and/or Senate...Issa will get a chairmanship and showboat from one baseless investigation to another.

Sestak is one of the best candidates the Democrats have running this year. The GOOP knows it and are trying all they can to bring him down so their "Club for Growth" buddy Toomer can steal this seat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 06:47 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. DIng Ding
We have a winner.
Dems should really be able to understand ReTHUGS by now. They had prepared for Specter and trying to discredit Sestak.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. We've Been Point This Out For How Long?????
But its good to see some do pick up on it now and then.

Hope things are safe and quiet your way...

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 06:37 AM
Response to Original message
6. If you're in PA, I suggest you find an event to attend and meet Sestak in person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBI_Un_Sub Donating Member (610 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
13. Smear job
by Darrel Issa to regain Santorum's seat for Toomey. Issa probably figures that the GOP can spin the "job offer" to make it look like Sestak went job hunting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC