Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FOUR MORE DAYS - Gulf Gusher fix attempt, "cut and cap," to take 4 days to implement

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 06:31 PM
Original message
FOUR MORE DAYS - Gulf Gusher fix attempt, "cut and cap," to take 4 days to implement
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/05/29/bp-says-so-far-gulf-well-_n_594501.html

BP admitted defeat Saturday in its attempt to plug the Gulf of Mexico oil leak by pumping mud into a busted well, but said it's preparing yet another method to fight the spill after a series of failures.

BP PLC Chief Operating Officer Doug Suttles said the company determined the "top kill" method had failed after after it spent three days pumping heavy drilling mud into the crippled well 5,000 feet underwater.

"This scares everybody, the fact that we can't make this well stop flowing, the fact that we haven't succeeded so far," Suttles said. "Many of the things we're trying have been done on the surface before, but have never been tried at 5,000 feet."

It was the latest setback for the company casting about for ways to stop the crude from further fouling waters, wildlife and marshland. A 100-ton box placed over the leak failed after ice-like crystals clogged it, while a mile-long tube that sucked more than 900,000 gallons of oil from the gusher was removed to make way for the top kill.

Suttles said BP is already preparing for the next attempt to stop the leak. Under the plan, BP would use robot submarines to cut off the damaged riser from which the oil is leaking, and then try to cap it with a containment valve. Officials say the cutting and capping effort would take at least four days.

"We're confident the job will work but obviously we can't guarantee success," Suttles said of the new plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Can someone explain what cut and cap is?
I figure if I busy my brain with details about efforts to stop this gusher, I might be able to contain my seething anger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I think I understand it.
See, you make a clean cut in the pipe so that you end up with an end that resembles an undamaged one: round, with a square end. Then you hope to be able to slip an open valve over top of that, sealing it in place. Finally you close the valve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. cut off the damaged riser from which the oil is leaking, and cap it with a containment valve
The riser would be a large diameter pipe (around 20") extending from a surface rig down to the well.

The containment valve is sort of an open framework that attaches to a flange on the top of the existing blowout preventer.

Once attached, the framework operates to draw the end of the riser down onto the flange so that the oil will go to the surface rig through the new riser pipe instead of gushing out the sides of the framework.

Roughly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 06:43 PM
Original message
That is what they're hoping for--to busy your brain.
Imagine a garden hose pumping water at insane pressure. It has holes in it. Top Kill inserted a smaller hose in the big hose and tried to plug up the big hose through stopping it up with heavier clay. Didn't work. Now they're cutting off the narrower area with the holes--which will make the spill leak more--in order to try a gadget that will sit on top of the hose and suck up all the water.

Mind you, the pressure in the BOP at this sea depth is about 5 tons per square inch. It's not like doing this operation at the surface.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. They are going to open her up with a giant can opener
Where the 'spill' is hampered by a kink at the top of the BOP (where it connects to the riser), they are going to release it and then hope to lower either a "dome" or another BOP on top of it.

You thought we were seeing a massive volcano of output now - just wait until they take off what is restraining it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
metapunditedgy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. Meanwhile BP stopped work on the backup relief well to use its parts for the operation.
Or at least that was the word earlier today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. not for this operation I believe - for the next, "BOP on BOP"
and it's still not acceptable. There are rigs enough around, if this isn't an occasion where the government can order one of them to be handed over (and pay the price, to be recouped from BP ofc) for parts, I don't know what is.

There may be technical reasons why parts of the relief well 2 are best suited - but then you get another set from somewhere else and get drilling with that.

Killing nr 2 when Obama ORDERED it - wtf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. There were/are 2 backup relief wells; work on 1 may have stopped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
metapunditedgy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. There were two relief wells total, the second ordered by the WH.
BP stopped work on the second, from what I heard.

Dispersants, relief wells... why the hell is Obama saying the buck stops with him when nobody even seems to be listening to the Executive Branch?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. yeah -- BP's whole "fuck the EPA" attitude kinda puts the lie to that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. "when nobody even seems to be listening to the Executive Branch"
that is very puzzling to me. I understand the impossibility to take over - but at LEAST declaring a national emergency, providing total transparency and having your orders fucking followed should be obvious.

There is a seat besides driver's seat and back seat. I'm sorry but I found and find the boot-to-the-neck not impressive and way too late. Christ, they do a new estimate after a whole MONTH - when BP 5000 barrels was based on SURFACE oil but they were using dispersants SUBSEA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
22. But if they didn't do that, they would have to send in more equipment and another crew!
Think of the overtime!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
metapunditedgy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. They only make $20 billion in profit a year.
(Per Yahoo Finance.) Pretty soon, this operation is going to start cutting into their balance sheets!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. Did I really need the sarcasm tag?
Really?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
metapunditedgy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #28
35. Nope, but I guess I did. :-) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. 4 to 7 is what I read (from BP). Luckily we haven't heard a succes %
I've read that it is gonna capture a part of the oil, definitely not all.

There is one possible adavantage - the riser pipe will have to be cut, so they get a clean cut just above the BOP that they can start from. This will make the ENTIRE leak visible - where today, they are NEVER showing the subsequent leaks at once. Not showing the end of the riser (which was on all the time) wasn't an accident I think. The horrible truth will bring even more pressure to bear on them - I hope that does some good to those concerned...

What I don't understand is why Massey (or was it Markey) doesn't put all of his feeds out there. I read they've got all of 'em and we have seen at CNN that they have at least 6 feeds. The people have a right to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. I've been anxiously waiting for them to move on to this stage
This is gonna work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. have you been following discussions of 'cut and cap' on the Oil Drum or other trade sites?
if you can -- post some links. we've all behind the curve on cut and cap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #10
30. It's called an LMRP cap
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. Hate to be the bearer of bad news
but the END SOLUTION is a relief well... that will take months. Heck even CNN is NOW explaining what I have been saying here for oh at least from the beginning. What would I know? No I am not an expert, but every time we have a blowout, this is exactly the chain of events... They have happened in the past you know. They have even been like in the news... oh wait, I forget not in the US. You know the last one before this was in oh Australia last year? What do you think was the end solution? RELIEF WELLS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. yep -- i think we're mostly aware of the 3 month (best case scenario) on the relief well
solution...these measures all fall under the heading of "patching the bleeding." making things even more grim -- there's no guarantee that the first, second or fifth attempt to drill a RW would be successful.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Actaully not everybody is aware of it
but it is good to see that I am not alone

:hi:

Nine to twelve months, sadly, would not shock me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
metapunditedgy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Which is why the backup (second) relief well is so important.
Even relief wells are tricky business and not guaranteed to succeed, so I have read.

Hopefully BP's halt on that backup well is just to move equipment around and won't affect the schedule. (Otherwise, what the hell is going on???)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. There should be 5! Ixtoc took 9 effing months
Edited on Sat May-29-10 07:19 PM by BelgianMadCow
what is the problem, no rigs? There are idling ones close by, in a natl emergency surely they can be commandeered. What, the cost? They make 15 billion minimum profit per year.

"In the next nine months, experts and divers including Red Adair were brought in to contain and cap the oil well.<6> An average of approximately ten thousand to thirty thousand barrels per day were discharged into the Gulf until it was finally capped on 23 March 1980, nearly 10 months later.<7>"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ixtoc_I_oil_spill

Rachel compared the current catastrophy to this one from 1979 - eerie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
metapunditedgy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Agreed. Even if there's a 25% chance that any given well will fail or be delayed,
that's too high a risk. Probably BP figures that if things aren't stopped 3 months from now, they will no longer be in charge of anything, anyway. So what does it matter to them.

The problem with corporations is they prioritize short-term gains and executive security over EVERYTHING.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. I thought a relief well was a new straw in the reservoir - it's not, great pic here
Edited on Sat May-29-10 07:25 PM by BelgianMadCow


on edit: this is from a May 18 article - so drill progress isn't current - and I wanted also to point out that hitting the existing well is pinpoint work and hard to do if you have to go through casing, as seems to be the case here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
metapunditedgy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #25
34. Yeah, as I understand it (based on TheOilDrum readings), the goal is to
actually intersect the blowout pipe way down, and pipe mud/cement into it from below.

Folks on that forum are quick to point out that this process is not foolproof, and the actual job of perfectly intersecting and drilling into a pipe that far down is very time-consuming and tricky.

Two wells seems like far too few, given the risks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. It took 5 relief well attempts to stop the Montara oil spill.
Really there should be at least 3 relief wells being drilled right now.

I really hope BP gets it right the first time.

But yes, relief wells are really the only working solution at this point.

Oh well....hopefully we'll get more robot action to watch. I loved watching the ROV with the saw this morning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
12. These fuckers have no idea what to do. This is just posturing.
This is going to go on for many months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
metapunditedgy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. BP has a bigger reservoir of posturing than they do of oil So what is the WH going to do? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sheltiemama Donating Member (892 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #18
33. My father wants BP's CEO arrested.
He's serious. He also wants us to nationalize BP if they try to get out of paying any of the costs of this mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
19. So they admit that 21,000 BBL have been siphoned
Anyone know how many days that sippy straw was down there? I know they removed it Wednesday, but don't recall when it was put down there.

Gov't is saying it was capturing 10% - so this may help validate flow claims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlesg Donating Member (311 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
26. We need a daily reminder on TV like Walter Cronkite did: "Today is Day 40 of the BP oil spill"
This thing is going to drag out like the Iran hostage crisis.
The Gulf is dying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. Keith Olbermann changed his signoff from "Mission Accomplished" to "Deepwater"
"It has been x days since the (disaster in the gulf - or similar)". GNGL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
31. more distractions until the relief well is drilled...
I hope I am wrong but I am just not buying this anymore
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
32. Diagram and explanation of "cut & cap" or LMRP


Simplified version:
1) cut away damaged riser from top of BOP.
2) lower LMRP (Lower Marine Riser Package) over the BOP
3) Inject Methanol (very low freezing point) into oil flow to prevent ice from forming
4) Siphon the oil/gas/methanol mix up to drilling platform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-10 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #32
36. thanks for posting this -- visuals are so important for us non-engineers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cetacea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-10 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
37. 4-7 days. Another week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-10 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #37
38. It's just THEATER. And the best case scenario is they don't make it worse
before the relief wells are done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cetacea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-10 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #38
40. +1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-10 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #37
39. Hey!
I tried to PM you but your box is blocked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cetacea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-10 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #39
41. Hello!
Fixed it! All ok?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC