Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Strapped towns tax Catholic properties

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 01:21 AM
Original message
Strapped towns tax Catholic properties
Church forced to pay for shuttered buildings

Nine cities and towns have forced the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Boston to pay property taxes on closed churches, schools, convents, and parish halls, contending that the buildings no longer qualify as tax-exempt because the archdiocese is not using them.

Two of the taxed churches — St. Frances X. Cabrini in Scituate and St. Jeremiah in Framingham — have been occupied for years by former parishioners protesting their closure. But local assessors insist the church buildings are now taxable because the vigils are not sanctioned by the archdiocese.

The archdiocese has fought back, arguing that its closed churches should remain exempt from taxation, but has had little success. In Belmont, Danvers, Lowell, Lynn, and Revere, the archdiocese has withdrawn appeals of tax bills for closed churches, reluctantly agreeing to pay reduced levies totaling about $280,000. This year, for example, it will pay the city of Lowell about $19,400 in property taxes on Sacred Heart Church, which was closed in 2003.

Hundreds of thousands of dollars remain in dispute before the state Appellate Tax Board, where the archdiocese hopes to fend off tax collectors in Framingham, Natick, and Scituate, and where it is also challenging Revere’s decision to tax a convent that still houses a small number of nuns.

http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2010/05/31/boston_area_communities_taxing_closed_catholic_properties/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 01:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. I am so impressed. Massachusetts did this? Wow!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. I don't understand why the Church didn't sell them. What was the point of
closing them, then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 02:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. I agre, but you have to have a buyer
and in many cases when these close there are in less desirable areas and the buildings are in bad shape, requiring significant overhaul or demolition (both expensive, particularly if you have asbestos involved (as my old Catholic High School did when it was demolished to make way for a strip center).





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 03:40 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. Never let go of land, never.
Ever.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 01:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. Hallelujah .. Can I have an AMEN?!!
Churches NEED to pay taxes.. they are a money-making entity.. NOW go after those televangelists & their cheese-ball tv "ministries" & their "colleges"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unrepentant Fenian Donating Member (707 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 02:00 AM
Response to Original message
4. All churches should be taxed on Real Property and Income.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Golden Raisin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 02:11 AM
Response to Original message
5. Good. But it should be
across the board and not single out any one, particular religion or sect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmericaIsGreat Donating Member (611 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 02:45 AM
Response to Original message
7. Sometimes, you gotta pay for the Lord
Sometimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Control-Z Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 03:17 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Where would I find that?
The New Testament?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 04:53 AM
Response to Original message
10. If we taxed ALL church property everywhere, it would take some burdon off our
property owners and all local tax payers. I am very happy to hear about this first step....once someone starts this, it will spread as local governments smell money...


mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 05:11 AM
Response to Original message
11. Kicked and Recommended!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 07:10 AM
Response to Original message
12. One can hope that this might be the wedge in the door that will finally end that tax free
Edited on Mon May-31-10 07:12 AM by BrklynLiberal
status that ALL churches enjoy.... ESPECIALLY for properties they own that are not used specifically for church services.
To me that would include schools, and any properties that they lease out to others.


http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/2010/04/syracuse_puts_several_closed_c.html
Syracuse puts several closed Catholic church properties on tax rolls
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
13. Good move...........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC