Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bill would end birthright citizenship for children of illegal immigrants (PE Riverside CA)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 09:55 AM
Original message
Bill would end birthright citizenship for children of illegal immigrants (PE Riverside CA)
Bill would end birthright citizenship for children of illegal immigrants
Rep. Gary Miller, R-Diamond Bar, is pushing legislation that would end birthright citizenship for children born to illegal immigrants.

Miller also is taking aim at the so-called "birth tourism" industry, which arranges the travel and hospitalization of non-Americans who wish to have their babies on U.S. soil for the purpose of acquiring citizenship for them.

* * * * * * * * * * * * *

Current law recognizing those children as American citizens stems from the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which states, "All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside."

* * * * * * * * * * * * *

But Miller argued that his legislation would not require a change to the Constitution. He pointed to a different section of the amendment that says, "Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article."

Does the 14th clause "Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation” give congress the authority to define “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” or is it left to SCOTUS to define that term?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. To be frank, I think this would take a lot of pressure off young girls to reproduce immediately upon
getting here. There are two very young women upstairs from me - they've got greencards and work in sandwich shops in the neighborhood. Within a year both were pregnant and neither with a husband. I know they're on foodstamps.

They work really hard and are the kind of folks that should have a good route to becoming citizens, but the pressures to get pregnant so soon after arrival make it a whole lot tougher on them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Who is pressuring them to have babies? Is it a family thing? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. Getting a legal citizen's foot on the ground as quickly as possible. Even
if it's the foot of an infant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. If they have green cards-
Why the pressure?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Because green cards don't make you or your children citizens
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. That's right. Being born here does. Hence, the pressures to do so. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. children born here can't sponsor anybody until they are 21
it is a bullshit argument usually fomented by anti-immigrant assholes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Who said they could?
You're ranting against an argument no one made
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Sorry, I'm not an anti-immigrant asshole. I think immigration should be easier.
Especially for folks such as these who struggled to get here and work hard.

But that pressure is there and you are less likely to be kicked out of the country if you have a child here who is a citizen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #15
25. your post #10 has more of the same types of talking points
so let me ask this: you wrote "I think immigration should be easier. Especially for folks such as these who struggled to get here and work hard."

Do you think undocumented folks "struggle to get here and work hard" and should have it easier as well?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #15
29. if you have a green card
you can be kicked out of the US for three reasons: taking up arms against the US, aiding or abetting an enemy of the US, or by committing certain class A felonies.

you can also lose your green card by leaving the US for 365 consecutive days without filing for a re-entry permit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #29
43. A friend of mine is an immigration lawyer and the law is capricious and enforced capriciously. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
28. so? the implied reason to have an anchor baby
is to stay in the US permanently. a Green Card gives you every right of a citizen, save that of voting. you have permanent residency, you can come and go as you please. what's the rush to get citizenship? you can apply for citizenship five years after gaining a green card, if you remain in the US for eleven months of every year. all a baby with US citizenship allows is for a parent to get a green card. then apply for citizenship, five years later. if you have a green card, having a child with US citizenship provides you no immigration benefits at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
32. it has been an issue in the D.C. area as well
the WaPo had a feature profile on a couple of teen girls a few months back...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunamagica Donating Member (430 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
35. GMAB, citizenship has nothing to do with it. Most of these girls
aren't even aware of the law. The pressure to get pregnant is cultural, and would happen anywhere they lived, because having babies to them defines their worth and womanhood.


Childless women are seen as lesser beings

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raineyb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
38. That's a disgusting stereotype. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
41. How do you know that's why they got pregnant?
Maybe it was just ignorance of birth control. Also, has it occurred to you if minimum wage were a living wage, there would be no need for food stamps. Besides I have know many immigrants in my life time and many who got pregnant while they were illegal, and surprise many were Europeans, but none of them got pregnant to have anchor babies. As a matter of fact, it was worrisome to them because they knew they could be separated from their American born children if they were caught.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
4. "Subject to the jurisdiction" is VERY clear
Everybody on United States soil is subject to the jurisdiction thereof with very few exceptions. Every exception is related to foreign nation diplomatic corps and military. All others are subject to the jurisiction of the United States.

Congress does not have the power to alter that short of declaring all undocumented immigrants to be part of their nations' diplomatic corps which means they cnanot be arrested while here.

Yeah, that'll solve a lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
5. because"anchor babies" are the cause of all our problems
assholes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Most other countries have similar rules
In some countries, children born in the country are citizens if the parents have been legal residents for five years or more. Makes sense to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #7
17. We need to get rid of instant citizenship and make earned citizenship opportunities easier. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stubtoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. Agreed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #7
18. Tougher rules in countries where healthcare is government-provided. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
31. and most other countries are not comprised
almost entirely of immigrants and the children of immigrants. so it's not really relevant is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harkadog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. This country isn't either now is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
8. With all respect to the Gentleman from Diamond Bar...
He's a freaking idiot. The language about enforcement means just that, enforcement, not interpretation. The language is perfectly clear: if you are born in the United States, you are a citizen. End of story. Unless we amend the constitution, that is.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
9. With all respect to the Gentleman from Diamond Bar...
He's a freaking idiot. The language about enforcement means just that, enforcement, not interpretation. The language is perfectly clear: if you are born in the United States, you are a citizen. End of story. Unless we amend the constitution, that is.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
12. Is he correct about this not requiring a change to the Constitution? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. That is the question I posed after the quote. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #12
21. The ultimate deciders of that question
will be the Justices who comprise the Supreme Court at the time a case would make it that Court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MyNameGoesHere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
19. Yes they want to get rid of brown people unless they are Cuban.
The wet foot, dry foot policy is the name given to a consequence of the 1995 revision of the Cuban Adjustment Act of 1966 that says, essentially, that anyone who fled Cuba and got into the United States would be allowed to pursue residency a year later. After talks with the Cuban government, the Clinton administration came to an agreement with Cuba that it would stop admitting people found at sea. Since then, in what has become known as the "wet foot, dry foot" policy, a Cuban caught on the waters between the two nations (i.e., with "wet feet") would summarily be sent home or to a third country. One who makes it to shore ("dry feet") gets a chance to remain in the United States, and later would qualify for expedited "legal permanent resident" status and U.S. citizenship.

Of course it has nothing to do with the fact that Cubans have in the past been rupuke leaning?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. The immigration laws are chock full of unfair double standards. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
22. Fortunately the Constitution trumps any bill this fool might introduce.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
23. The OP has me on ignore. SOmebody ask him why he's pretending not to have an opinion on this.
And failing epically at that, I might add.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. It's probably better to direct that question to the mods. Surely, they know the drill with this one.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
24. Darn that pesky Constitution!
Why does it keep getting in the way of real 'Murkins like this guy? :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glen123098 Donating Member (419 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
30. So these children will be born with no country to call home?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #30
44. You are a citizen of the country of your parents. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SwampG8r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
34. good
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
36. "Subject to the jurisdiction of"
would serve to differentiate the described persons from people such as diplomats who are not subject to our laws.

"Power to enforce" does not also convey the power to circumvent the express intent.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
37. People who defend this crap don't have moral standing to...
...defend ANYTHING with "it's in the Constitution".

You know what I'm gunning for here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
39. They can't change a constitutional right without an amendment.
What are these idiot Repukes learning in law school, or are they following the Bush plan to ignore the Constitution and write laws that suit them whenever they wish?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. probably good ol' Liberty Law School and Christian U
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojeoux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
40. FUCK Gary Miller, R-Diamond Bar
Fuck him up!

I hate this shit.

Our beautiful USA is right on the border with the "Grapes of Wrath."

We should be helping to raise living standards all over the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #40
45. Totally agree!
I originally lived in Diamond Bar - and the more I read about this guy the more I'm beginning to resent him. Seriously, this shit is going too far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 05:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC