blogslut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-31-10 10:16 AM
Original message |
Here's a fun bunch of numbers |
|
Twitter followers: Glenn Beck = 239,907 http://twitter.com/GLENNBECKBill O'Reilly = 30,180 http://twitter.com/oreillyfactorSean Hannity = 37,228 http://twitter.com/seanhannitySarah Palin = 159,610 http://twitter.com/sarahpalinusaRachell Maddow = 1,654,117http://twitter.com/MaddowMs. Maddow's Twitter followers number three times more than all four Fox talky talkers, combined.
|
Oceansaway
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-31-10 10:20 AM
Response to Original message |
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-31-10 10:22 AM
Response to Original message |
nichomachus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-31-10 10:33 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Those look like liberal numbers to me |
|
I actually had a student say that after I wrote some statistics on the board that countered an argument she was trying to make.
|
JeffersonChick
(338 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-01-10 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
NC_Nurse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-31-10 10:41 AM
Response to Original message |
4. Old folks don't twitter. Isn't the average age of a Fox viewer around 65? |
customerserviceguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-31-10 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
7. That's what I was thinking, as well |
|
It's about as fair a comparison as an Internet-only poll. In other words, meaningless.
|
doublethink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-31-10 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. Actually it means to me that a lot of idiots will die off sooner. n.t. |
|
And I have no problem with that. :rofl:
|
SheilaT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-31-10 10:43 AM
Response to Original message |
|
has 64,118.
Pretty impressive since supposedly no one watches MSNBC.
|
Usrename
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-31-10 10:56 AM
Response to Original message |
|
And they're... well, they're not.
|
blogslut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-31-10 08:59 PM
Response to Original message |
JeffersonChick
(338 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-01-10 09:50 AM
Response to Original message |
|
this is the case, when Fox dominates in terms of viewership numbers?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:19 AM
Response to Original message |